1.Postoperative norepinephrine versus dopamine in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a propensity-matched analysis using a nationwide intensive care database
Yoshitaka AOKI ; Mikio NAKAJIMA ; Sho SUGIMURA ; Yasuhito SUZUKI ; Hiroshi MAKINO ; Yukako OBATA ; Matsuyuki DOI ; Yoshiki NAKAJIMA
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2023;76(5):481-489
Background:
Choosing catecholamines, such as norepinephrine and dopamine, for perioperative blood pressure control is essential for anesthesiologists and intensivists. However, studies specific to noncardiac surgery are limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effects of postoperative norepinephrine and dopamine on clinical outcomes in adult noncardiac surgery patients by analyzing a nationwide intensive care patient database.
Methods:
The Japanese Intensive care PAtient Database (JIPAD) was used for this multicenter retrospective study. Adult patients in the JIPAD who received norepinephrine or dopamine within 24 h after noncardiac surgery in 2018–2020 were included. We compared the norepinephrine and dopamine groups using a one-to-one propensity score matching analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital length of stay, and ICU length of stay.
Results:
A total of 6,236 eligible patients from 69 ICUs were allocated to the norepinephrine (n = 4,652) or dopamine (n = 1,584) group. Propensity score matching was used to create a matched cohort of 1,230 pairs. No differences in the in-hospital mortality was found between the two propensity score matched groups (risk difference: 0.41%, 95% CI [−1.15, 1.96], P = 0.608). Among the secondary outcomes, only the ICU length of stay was significantly shorter in the norepinephrine group than in the dopamine group (median length: 3 vs. 4 days, respectively; P < 0.001).
Conclusions
In adult patients after noncardiac surgery, norepinephrine was not associated with decreased mortality but was associated with a shorter ICU length of stay than dopamine.
2.Effect of inducible nitric oxide synthase on intestinal microcirculation in endotoxic shock.
En-Yi SHI ; Xiao-Jing JIANG ; Han BAI ; Tian-Xiang GU ; Nakajima YOSHIKI
Acta Physiologica Sinica 2005;57(1):39-44
To investigate the changes of intestinal microcirculation in endotoxic shock and the effect of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) on intestinal microcirculation, endotoxic shock was induced by intravenous injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mice. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was monitored throughout the experimental procedure. The velocity and flux of red blood cell (RBC) in villus tip arteriole and capillaries were measured by FITC-labeled erythrocytes and intravital microscopy. The effect of iNOS was determined by targeted disruption of mice iNOS-gene and administration of S-methylthiourea sulfate (SMT), a selective inhibitor of iNOS, before LPS injection. No significant differences in MAP, RBC velocity and flux at baseline were found among wild type mice, SMT pretreated mice and iNOS-gene knockout mice. LPS induced a dramatic fall of MAP in wild type mice. The decrease of MAP was significantly restored in iNOS-gene knockout mice and in wild type mice received SMT before LPS injection. The velocity and flux of RBC in villus tip arteriole and capillaries decreased markedly after LPS injection in wild type mice, while significantly higher velocity and flux of RBC were found in iNOS-gene knockout mice and SMT-pretreated mice both 60 and 120 min after LPS injection. The results demonstrate that iNOS plays an essential role in the intestinal microcirculation disturbance which occurs in endotoxic shock.
Animals
;
Intestines
;
blood supply
;
Lipopolysaccharides
;
Male
;
Mice
;
Mice, Knockout
;
Microcirculation
;
physiology
;
Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II
;
genetics
;
physiology
;
Shock, Septic
;
chemically induced
;
physiopathology
3.Comparison of postoperative nausea and vomiting between remimazolam and propofol: a propensity score-matched, retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study
Yuji SUZUKI ; Shingo KAWASHIMA ; Hiroshi MAKINO ; Matsuyuki DOI ; Yoshiki NAKAJIMA
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 2023;76(2):143-151
Background:
Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that has recently become available for general anesthesia. However, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) associated with remimazolam remains unknown. In this propensity score-matched, retrospective, observational study, we compared the rates of PONV between remimazolam and propofol.
Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, propensity score-matching was performed to minimize selection bias. Patients who received total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol at the Hamamatsu University Hospital between August 2020 and July 2021 were enrolled in the study. Data on patient demographics, anesthetic agents, and PONV within the first 24 h were collected and analyzed.
Results:
Of the 1,239 patients who met the study selection criteria, 585 received remimazolam and 684 received propofol. After propensity score matching, 333 matched pairs were further analyzed. Patient demographics and the anesthetic agents used were comparable between the matched cohorts. The incidence of PONV was significantly higher in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group (35% vs. 21%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
The incidence of PONV is higher with remimazolam anesthesia than with propofol anesthesia. The findings of this study require confirmation in larger prospective randomized controlled trials.