1.A Case of Beh\ccet's Disease Successfully Treated with Keishibukuryogan, Whose Liver Damage Was Caused by Orengedokuto
Yoshiki NAGAI ; Kanjirou MASUDA
Kampo Medicine 2009;60(5):527-531
We present the case of 65 year-old male with Behçet's disease who was successfully treated with the Kampo medicine keishibukuryogan. The patient presented with hyperemic conjunctiva, ocular pain and uveitis at the age of 38, and was diagnosed with Behçet's disease. One year later he was affected with ulcerative glossitis, which was also diagnosed as a manifestation of Behçet's disease. At the age of 56 he was presented with acute arthritis of his ankle joint, followed by ulcerative stomatitis and glossitis. He was treated with colchicine and cyclophosphamide. Thereafter, he suffered from recurrent oral aphthous ulcers, and arthritis. Intractable oral ulcers, which did not respond to Western medicine, led him to seek Oriental herbal remedies. Keishibukuryogan was prescribed and, since then, his oral ulcers have completely subsided and his arthritis has not been a problem. He has been relieved from all manifestations of Behçet's disease.Thus, we believe that the Kampo medicine keishibukuryogan should be taken into consideration when treating Behçet's disease.Moreover, liver dysfunction caused by the Kampo medicine orengedokuto arose at an early stage of therapy, but immediately disappeared when its use was stopped. Pharmacoepidemiologically, Scutellariae radix, an ingredient of orengedokuto, was suspected of causing this liver dysfunction.
seconds
;
Medicine
;
Medicine, Kampo
;
Oral
;
Arthritis
2.Rationale for Contraindications for Pregnant and Breast-Feeding Women in the Package Inserts of Prescription Drugs and Changes in Information by the Revised Instructions
Shoji SERA ; Ayumu FURUYA ; Yoshiki KAMEDA ; Akira OKADA ; Naomi NAGAI
Japanese Journal of Social Pharmacy 2024;43(1):31-39
The package inserts revision regarding prescription drugs is an ongoing process. In this study, we examined the status of this revision and how the content of the information provided has been updated with the new instructions, including the rationale for contraindications for pregnant and breast-feeding women. A total of 407 prescription drugs for pregnant and breast-feeding women were contraindicated, accounting for approximately 15% of the 2,627 nonproprietary names. The number of contraindicated drugs for pregnant, breast-feeding, and both pregnant and breast-feeding women were 406, 44, and 43, respectively. The majority of the contraindications were based on nonclinical data, such as teratogenicity and fetotoxicity data in reproductive toxicity studies involving pregnant animals and pharmacokinetic information in breast-feeding animals. The overall revision rate for the new instructions was 16.2% after three years of revision work for each drug. The alert wording has been revised to provide more clarity and consistency, with three categories of statements: “should not be administered/avoid breastfeeding,” “advisable not to administer/breastfeed,” and “should be administered/breastfeed in consideration of the therapeutic benefit (benefit-risk consideration).” The statement indicating that the drug should not be administered to pregnant women remained in the revised instructions. Conversely, the revision of the description for breast-feeding women from “should be discontinued/avoided” to “benefit-risk consideration” may have improved the usefulness of the product, allowing healthcare professionals to make more informed decisions after considering the transfer of the drug into milk, its pharmacological effects, and other factors.