Recent advances in both diagnostic and therapeutic technologies have caused dramatic changes in treatment strategy for esophageal cancer patients. In this lecture, we will introduce the advances in multimodal treatment for esophageal cancer, based on our own experiences. 1. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (DCF) for node-positive esophageal cancer. Recently, in Japan, an efficacy of NAC for resectable advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus has been reported. DCF is expected to be a powerful alternative to cisplatin/5-fluorouracil. Our experience on neoadjuvant or induction DCF will be demonstrated. 2. Efficacy and safety of salvage esophagectomy after dCRT. Salvage esophagectomy is an almost only method to cure the patients with local failure after dCRT, although high mortality and morbidity rates have been reported. We performed 40 cases of salvage esophagectomy during the last 7 years and no hospital mortality has been experienced. Benefit of salvage surgery and procedures to decrease surgical risk will be discussed. 3. Basic research for individualized treatment. If an individualized treatment strategy can be established based on some predictive markers, both improved survival and preserved quality of life will be realized. We will demonstrate the possibility of epigenetic analysis (e.g., LINE-1 methylation level) as biomarkers to predict patient prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of interruption and reinitiation of monthly minodronate therapy on the bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism markers in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Study patients were included if they had been administered monthly minodronate therapy for ≥6 months, interrupted the therapy, and reinitiated the therapy for ≥12 months. The BMD and bone metabolism markers were assessed at 4 time points: initiation, interruption, reinitiation and 1 year after reinitiation of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients were enrolled. The mean monthly minodronate treatment period was 23.8 ± 12.9 months following a mean interruption period of 11.9 ± 5.4 months. Once increased by monthly minodronate treatment for 2 years on average, the BMD of lumbar spine and radius did not significantly decrease even after an interruption for 1 year on average. However, the BMD of the femoral neck did decrease after interruption. The BMD of the lumbar spine and radius increased further after 1 year of monthly minodronate retreatment. The BMD of the femoral neck did not change. Once decreased after the treatment for an average of 2 years followed by an interruption for 1 year, bone metabolism markers increased gradually but did not recover to baseline levels. A potent suppressive effect on bone resorption was noted. The change rate was greater for the bone formation marker procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly minodronate treatment increases BMD and reduces bone metabolism markers. The effect lessens after treatment interruptions, and can be restored by retreatment.
Bone Density ; Bone Resorption ; Female ; Femur Neck ; Humans ; Metabolism ; Osteogenesis ; Osteoporosis ; Procollagen ; Radius ; Retreatment ; Spine