1.Occurrence of Ventricular Tachycardia After Adrenaline Local Injection During Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
Hidenori UMEKI ; Aya OSONOI ; Atsushi FUSEGI ; Chiaki OKAMOTO ; Mikiko TSUGATA ; Yoshiaki SOMEKAWA
Journal of the Japanese Association of Rural Medicine 2015;63(5):758-763
A 32-year-old woman underwent the laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. During the operation, adrenaline was injected into her right ovary, because the amount of bleeding decreased. Soon after the injection, ventricular tachycardia occurred and her blood pressure increased to 190/125. The use of lidocaine induced the electrocardiogram to return to normal and brought down the blood pressure to a normal range. The operation was finished without hitch. Vasopressin has both an excellent hemostatic effect and cardiovascular side effects, and is often used at many medical facilities in Japan. But the treatment with vasopressin is neither covered by health insurance nor the relief system for sufferers from adverse drug reactions. So we usually use adrenaline which is insurable at laparoscopic operations. Adrenaline has also a hemostatic property, and causes severe cardiovascular adverse events such as ventricular tachycardia when used together with halogenated inhalation anesthetic. The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists concludes that no serious side effects will arise from using adrenalin and sevoflurane or isoflurane based on its own findings. We had a case with ventricular tachycardia which occurred after an adrenaline local injection. But we recommend a careful use of adrenaline for local injection during a laparoscopic operation.
2.A Case of Multiple Aneurysms due to Aortitis Syndrome.
Shinichi Suzuki ; Jiro Kondo ; Kiyotaka Imoto ; Michio Tobe ; Yoshihiro Iwai ; Masahiko Okamoto ; Mitsuchika Nakamura ; Yoshinori Takanashi ; Yoshiaki Inayama
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2000;29(2):98-101
A 51-year-old man underwent arch replacement for a thoracic aortic succular aneurysm in December 1996. The pathological examination indicated aortitis to be the cause of the aneurysm. At that time we did not surgically treat the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) which was only 32mm in diameter. Sixteen months after the first operation, he complained of a pulsatile tumor in his left leg. Angiography revealed an aneurysm of the left superficial femoral artery. The artery distal to the aneurysm was occluded, and the left popliteal artery received collateral blood flow from the deep femoral artery. The size of the AAA increased to 48mm, an indication of repair. Aneurysmectomy of the left superficial femoral artery and replacement of the abdominal aorta were performed simultaneously. The operative findings showed that the aneurysm of the left superficial femoral artery had been ruptured and formed a pseudoaneurysm. The pathological findings demonstrated both aneurysm aortitis. After the second operation, he was given steroid therapy to control the inflammatory reaction and he has been well for one year.
3.Multi-center Study to Assess the Feasibility of the Self-Check Program for Palliative Care Team
Shoko AKIZUKI ; Nobuya AKIZUKI ; Yoko NAKAZAWA ; Hirofumi ABO ; Yuya ISE ; Yoshiaki OKAMOTO ; Mikiko KAIZU ; Yuichi SHINADA ; Akiko YAMASHIRO ; Akihiro SAKASHITA ; Masashi KATO
Palliative Care Research 2018;13(2):195-200
Introduction: Number of palliative care team increase every year, but the quality of team might differ from each other. We developed “Self-Check Program for Palliative Care Team” to assess and improve the quality of palliative care team. We report the result of the multi-center study to assess the feasibility of this program. Methods: We underwent the “Self-Check Program” as a trial at seven hospitals in Japan in February 2016. We took a questionnaire survey to team leaders and participants to assess the feasibility of this program. Results: Fifty-two medical staffs in six hospitals accomplished this program. Time scheduling and the integration of opinions from each team members were the difficulties came up from questionnaire survey. All team leaders and 87.8% of the participants answered that this program was effective to extract and improve the problem of the team. Also 83.3% of the team leaders were satisfied with the process of planning. Conclusion: Despite some difficulties, majority of the participants considering useful, this program is considered feasible.