Background: and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods: We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and KWOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

Background: and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods: We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and KWOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

Background: and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods: We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and KWOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

Background: and Purpose The wearing-off (WO) phenomenon is the most common motor complication in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its identification remains challenging. The 9- and 19-item Wearing-off Questionnaires (WOQ-9 and WOQ-19) are self-assessment tools for motor and nonmotor symptoms that are widely used for WO screening. We produced Korean versions of the WOQ-19 and WOQ-9 (K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9) and investigated their validity and reliability. Methods: We used the translation–back translation method to produce K-WOQ-19 and KWOQ-9, which were self-administered by 124 patients with PD. We conducted in-depth 10-minute interviews for confirming the presence of the WO phenomenon, and then stratified the participants into groups with and without WO. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves. Concurrent validity was assessed using the Movement Disorder Society–Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) and the Hoehn and Yahr stage with Spearman’s rank correlation analysis. Reliability was assessed based on test–retest Cohen’s kappa (κ) values and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: The optimal cutoff scores on the K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 for WO screening were 4 and 2, respectively. The test–retest ICCs of K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 were 0.943 and 0.938, respectively. Nineteen of the combined 20 items in K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 showed moderate-to-substantial agreement (κ=0.412–0.771, p<0.001). The scores on the translated scales were significantly correlated with MDS-UPDRS IV scores. Conclusions K-WOQ-19 and K-WOQ-9 are reliable and valid tools for detecting WO, with optimal cutoff scores of 4 and 2, respectively.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Overlap syndrome of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) (AIH-PBC overlap syndrome) is a rare disease that has not been clearly characterized in Korean patients. This study investigated the clinical features of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome compared with those of AIH and PBC alone. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 158 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as AIH (n=61), PBC (n=81), or AIH-PBC overlap syndrome (n=9) based on the Paris and the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) criteria from 2001 to 2011 in Korea. We compared the clinical features of these three groups retrospectively, including their biochemical characteristics, treatments, responses, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients exhibited biochemical characteristics of both AIH and PBC, and showed a similar response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy as for the PBC patients. However, the response of AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients to UDCA and steroid combination therapy was worse than the response of AIH patients to steroid-based therapy (P=0.024). Liver cirrhosis developed more rapidly in AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients than in AIH patients group (P=0.013), but there was no difference between AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients and PBC patients. The rates of developing hepatic decompensation did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The AIH-PBC overlap syndrome patients exhibited a worse response to UDCA and steroid combination therapy and a faster cirrhotic progression compared with AIH patients.
Adult ; Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Female ; Hepatitis, Autoimmune/complications/*diagnosis ; Humans ; Liver/metabolism/pathology ; Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary/complications/*diagnosis/drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Steroids/therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use