1.On predicting epileptic seizures from intracranial electroencephalography.
Biomedical Engineering Letters 2017;7(1):1-5
This study investigates the sensitivity and specificity of predicting epileptic seizures from intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG). A monitoring system is studied to generate an alarm upon detecting a precursor of an epileptic seizure. The iEEG traces of ten patients suffering from medically intractable epilepsy were used to build a prediction model. From the iEEG recording of each patient, power spectral densities were calculated and classified using support vector machines. The prediction results varied across patients. For seven patients, seizures were predicted with 100% sensitivity without any false alarms. One patient showed good sensitivity but lower specificity, and the other two patients showed lower sensitivity and specificity. Predictive analytics based on the spectral feature of iEEG performs well for some patients but not all. This result highlights the need for patient-specific prediction models and algorithms.
Drug Resistant Epilepsy
;
Electrocorticography*
;
Electroencephalography
;
Epilepsy*
;
Humans
;
Seizures
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Support Vector Machine
2.Spike-triggered Clustering for Retinal Ganglion Cell Classification
Jungryul AHN ; Yongseok YOO ; Yong Sook GOO
Experimental Neurobiology 2020;29(6):433-452
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the retina’s output neurons, encode visual information through spiking. The RGC receptive field (RF) represents the basic unit of visual information processing in the retina. RFs are commonly estimated using the spike-triggered average (STA), which is the average of the stimulus patterns to which a given RGC is sensitive. Whereas STA, based on the concept of the average, is simple and intuitive, it leaves more complex structures in the RFs undetected. Alternatively, spike-triggered covariance (STC) analysis provides information on second-order RF statistics. However, STC is computationally cumbersome and difficult to interpret. Thus, the objective of this study was to propose and validate a new computational method, called spike-triggered clustering (STCL), specific for multimodal RFs. Specifically, RFs were fit with a Gaussian mixture model, which provides the means and covariances of multiple RF clusters. The proposed method recovered bipolar stimulus patterns in the RFs of ON-OFF cells, while the STA identified only ON and OFF RGCs, and the remaining RGCs were labeled as unknown types. In contrast, our new STCL analysis distinguished ON-OFF RGCs from the ON, OFF, and unknown RGC types classified by STA. Thus, the proposed method enables us to include ON-OFF RGCs prior to retinal information analysis.
3.New Features of Receptive Fields in Mouse Retina through Spike-triggered Covariance
Jungryul AHN ; Bodo RUECKAUER ; Yongseok YOO ; Yong Sook GOO
Experimental Neurobiology 2020;29(1):38-49
Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) encode various spatiotemporal features of visual information into spiking patterns. The receptive field (RF) of each RGC is usually calculated by spike-triggered average (STA), which is fast and easy to understand, but limited to simple and unimodal RFs. As an alternative, spike-triggered covariance (STC) has been proposed to characterize more complex patterns in RFs. This study compares STA and STC for the characterization of RFs and demonstrates that STC has an advantage over STA for identifying novel spatiotemporal features of RFs in mouse RGCs. We first classified mouse RGCs into ON, OFF, and ON/OFF cells according to their response to full-field light stimulus, and then investigated the spatiotemporal patterns of RFs with random checkerboard stimulation, using both STA and STC analysis. We propose five sub-types (T1-T5) in the STC of mouse RGCs together with their physiological implications. In particular, the relatively slow biphasic pattern (T1) could be related to excitatory inputs from bipolar cells. The transient biphasic pattern (T2) allows one to characterize complex patterns in RFs of ON/OFF cells. The other patterns (T3-T5), which are contrasting, alternating, and monophasic patterns, could be related to inhibitory inputs from amacrine cells. Thus, combining STA and STC and considering the proposed sub-types unveil novel characteristics of RFs in the mouse retina and offer a more holistic understanding of the neural coding mechanisms of mouse RGCs.
4.Synchrony of Spontaneous Burst Firing between Retinal Ganglion Cells Across Species
Jungryul AHN ; Huu Lam PHAN ; Seongkwang CHA ; Kyo-in KOO ; Yongseok YOO ; Yong Sook GOO
Experimental Neurobiology 2020;29(4):285-299
Neurons communicate with other neurons in response to environmental changes. Their goal is to transmit information to their targets reliably. A burst, which consists of multiple spikes within a short time interval, plays an essential role in enhancing the reliability of information transmission through synapses. In the visual system, retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the output neurons of the retina, show bursting activity and transmit retinal information to the lateral geniculate neuron of the thalamus. In this study, to extend our interest to the population level, the burstings of multiple RGCs were simultaneously recorded using a multi-channel recording system. As the first step in network analysis, we focused on investigating the pairwise burst correlation between two RGCs. Furthermore, to assess if the population bursting is preserved across species, we compared the synchronized bursting of RGCs between marmoset monkey (callithrix jacchus), one species of the new world monkeys and mouse (C57BL/6J strain). First, monkey RGCs showed a larger number of spikes within a burst, while the inter-spike interval, burst duration, and inter-burst interval were smaller compared with mouse RGCs. Monkey RGCs showed a strong burst synchronization between RGCs, whereas mouse RGCs showed no correlated burst firing. Monkey RGC pairs showed significantly higher burst synchrony and mutual information than mouse RGC pairs did.Comprehensively, through this study, we emphasize that two species have a different bursting activity of RGCs and different burst synchronization suggesting two species have distinctive retinal processing.