Objective:To study the alteration of K-ras mutations in different stages of colorectal cancer(CRC) and its influence on the progression of CRC. Methods:The 20 paraffin-embedded tissues, including primary foci, metastatic lymph nodes, remoter metastatic foci, colorectal adenoma, and normal colorectal tissues, were collected from 20 patients with colorectal cancer. The sequence of PCR-amplified products were analyzed. Results:The wild K-ras gene was expressed in normal colorectal tissues. The mutation frequency of K-ras gene was 20.0% (4/20) in colorectal adenoma, 30.0% (6/20) in primary foci, 25.0% (5/20) in metastatic lymph nodes, and 30% (6/20) in remote metastatic lesions. In the samples with K-ras mutations, the consistency of the types of K-ras mutations between primary foci and colorectal carcinoma, lymph node metastatic lesions, remote metastatic lesions was 0.0%(0/4), 40.0%(2/5), and 50.0%(3/6), respectively.Conclusion:The colorectal adenoma, metastatic lymph nodes and remote metastatic lesions were not suited for K-ras analysis as routine samples in clinical practice. If the samples of primary lesions were not available, the detection results of metastatic lymph nodes and remote metastatic remote lesions will provide some reference values. K-ras gene had several different mutations in the progression of CRC.

Objective To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions of raltitrexed plus oxaliplatin (RALOX project) and S1 in patients with advanced primary liver cancer.Methods Seventy-one patients with advanced primary liver cancer admitted to 6 cancer centers from July 2013 to July 2015 were divided into 2 groups according to the wishes of the patients and their families:RALOX group (34 patients) and S1 group (37 patients).The therapeutic efficacy such as objective remission rate (ORR),disease control rate (DCR),median overall survival (mOS),median progression free survival (mPFS),one year survival rate (SR),and adverse reactions in these patients were evaluated.Results Thirty-one patients could be evaluated in RALOX group,and 6 patients obtained partial response (PR),10 stable disease (SD) and 15 progressive disease (PD).Thirty-three patients could be evaluated in S1 group,and 3 patients obtained PR,8 patients SD and 22 PD.The ORR,DCR,and one year SR were 19.4％ vs.9.1％,51.6％ vs.33.3％,and 22.6％ vs.12.1％ respectively,and there were no statistically significant differences in the two groups (x2 =1.393,P =0.238;x2 =2.190,P =0.139;x2 =1.229,P =0.268).The mOS and mPFS were 7.2 months vs.6.1 months and 3.4 months vs.2.8 months,and there were statistically significant differences in the two groups (x2 =6.433,P =0.011;x2 =4.078,P =0.043).There was more serious peripheral nerve toxicity (29.0％ vs.3.0％,x2 =6.344,P =0.012) and lighter hand-foot syndrome (9.7％ vs.30.3％,x2 =4.201,P =0.040) in RALOX group than S1 group.But the incidences of other adverse effects were similar in the two groups.Condnsion RALOX project is safe and effective to the patients with advanced primary liver cancer.Compare with S1 project,RALOX project has better curative effects and the majority of adverse reactions are tolerable.The patients have good condition control and survival benefit.

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and drug-toxic reactions of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin (RALOX protocol) and 5-fluorouracil + calciumfolinate + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX 4 protocol) in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced primary liver cancer (PLC).Methods A total of 72 patients with PLC were selected and randomly divided into RALOX group (n =34) and FOLFOX 4 group (n =38).The objective response rate (RR) was evaluated every 6 weeks after chemotherapy,while objective remission rate (OR),disease-control rate (DCR),median survival rate (mOS),median progression-free survival (mPFS),1-year survival rate (SR) as well as toxic and adverse reactions were observed.Results In RALOX group,31 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 19.4％,51.6％,7.2 months,3.4 months,and 22.6％,respectively.In FOLFOX 4 group,29 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 13.8％,48.3％,6.9 months,3.3 months and 20.7％,respectively.RALOX group was significantly lower than FOLFOX 4 group in the incidence rates of gastrointestinal reactions,liver toxicity,cardiac toxicity,peripheral nervous toxicity and hand-foot syndrome,but there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of renal toxicity and myelosuppression between two groups.Conclusion RALOX is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced PLC,and is superior to FOLFOX 4 protocol in clinical efficacy with mild adverse reactions.

Objective:To analyze the effect of different vascular access on the outcome in peripheral blood stem cells collection by a network Meta-analysis, and to provide a reference for clinical medical staff to select the best vascular access.Methods:A systematic search was carried out in Chinese Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, from inception until April 15, 2023. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R4.2.2 and Addis-1.16.6 softwares.Results:A total 7 pieces of research were included, 5 vascular access methods were peripheral artery, peripheral vein, artery-vein, femoral vein-central venous catheter (FV-CVC), and internal jugular vein-CVC (IJV-CVC). The results showed that compared with the peripheral veins, there was no significant difference on CD34 cells between other vascular accesses in the primary outcome measure when collected peripheral blood stem cell collection. On the single blood volume treatment time, peripheral vein and IJV-CVC were statistically significant ( MD = 14.80, 95% CI 2.70-22.38, P<0.05) . The SUCRA ranking probability chart showed that on CD34 cells, FV- CVC>IJV-CVC>artery-vein>peripheral artery>peripheral vein access; for a single blood volume treatment time and monocyte number, peripheral artery was superior and the next was peripheral vein. Conclusions:Current evidence suggested that Peripheral artery may be the best vascular access in peripheral blood stem cells collection, which opens a new way to establish the vascular access for peripheral blood stem cells collection, but it needs to be confirmed by large clinic trials.

Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and drug-toxic reactions of raltitrexed combined with oxaliplatin (RALOX protocol) and 5-fluorouracil + calciumfolinate + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX 4 protocol) in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced primary liver cancer (PLC).Methods A total of 72 patients with PLC were selected and randomly divided into RALOX group (n =34) and FOLFOX 4 group (n =38).The objective response rate (RR) was evaluated every 6 weeks after chemotherapy,while objective remission rate (OR),disease-control rate (DCR),median survival rate (mOS),median progression-free survival (mPFS),1-year survival rate (SR) as well as toxic and adverse reactions were observed.Results In RALOX group,31 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 19.4％,51.6％,7.2 months,3.4 months,and 22.6％,respectively.In FOLFOX 4 group,29 patients were evaluable,with OR,DCR,mOS,mPFS,and 1-year SR being 13.8％,48.3％,6.9 months,3.3 months and 20.7％,respectively.RALOX group was significantly lower than FOLFOX 4 group in the incidence rates of gastrointestinal reactions,liver toxicity,cardiac toxicity,peripheral nervous toxicity and hand-foot syndrome,but there were no significant differences in the incidence rates of renal toxicity and myelosuppression between two groups.Conclusion RALOX is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with middle and advanced PLC,and is superior to FOLFOX 4 protocol in clinical efficacy with mild adverse reactions.