No abstract available.

No abstract available.
Asthma* ; Humans ; Permeability*

BACKGROUND: It has been well known that the degree of HLA matching in renal transplantation is important in graft and patient survival. Because HLA-identical living-related donor grafts are free from immunological attacks, they have benefits of one immunosuppressants or early withdrawal of steroids. However, there is acute rejection due to early withdrawal of immunosuppressants and graft loss due to recurrent glomerulonephritis following HLA- identical living-related renal transplantation. The purpose of this study is to determine the graft survival and the impact of recurrent glomerulonephritis on graft survival in HLA-identical living-related donor grafts. METHODS: From December 1984 to March 2004, 44 HLA-identical and 80 HLA-haploidentical living- related renal transplants in Bongsaeng Memorial Hospital were included in this study. We evaluated graft survivals, immunosuppressants and causes of graft failure. RESULTS: The mean graft survival for HLA-identical transplants is 198 months (16.5 years) and for HLA-haploidentical transplants is 166 months (13.8 years), respectively (p=NS). Acute rejection episodes occurred in 2 of the 44 (5%) identical transplants and 17 of the 80 (21%) haploidentical transplants, respectively (p=0.013). 6 grafts were lost in HLA- identical transplants and the causes are 4 recurrent glomerulonephritis (66.7%), 2 chronic rejections (33.4 %). 11 grafts were lost in HLA-haploidentical transplants and the causes are 6 chronic rejections (54.5 %), 1 acute rejection (9.1%), 1 drug toxicity (9.1%), 3 patient deaths (27.3%). Recurrent glomerulonephritis in HLA-identical transplants are three, but in HLA-haploidentical transplants are none. CONCLUSION: Our data revealed that there was no difference in graft survival between the two groups, but lower acute rejection rate in HLA-identical groups. Recurrent glomerulonephritis was the main cause of graft failure in HLA-identical groups and the impact of recurrent disease on graft survival needs to be investigated.
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; Glomerulonephritis ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents ; Kidney Transplantation ; Steroids ; Tissue Donors* ; Transplants

Background/Aims: Constipation is a common gastrointestinal disease that reduces the quality of life and incurs considerable medical expenses. Bisacodyl and sodium docusate are generally used to treat constipation. This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of Goodmorning S Granule® (Hanpoong Pharm. Co., Ltd., Wanju, Korea) in functional constipation by a comparison with bisacodyl. Methods: A 2-week randomized, double-blind, active-controlled exploratory clinical trial was conducted to compare the treatment (Goodmorning S Granule® ) with the control (bisacodyl). The efficacy was measured by the changes in transition, Bristol stool type, stomachache, clinical manifestation, defecation time after drug consumption, 36-item short-form survey (SF-36), and the results of improvement evaluation. The safety was evaluated by the incidence of adverse drug events and vital signs. Additional analyses were conducted by dividing the severity according to the proportion of Bristol Stool Scale types 1 and 2. Results: Subjects were randomized to the treatment (n=24) or control (n=26) groups. No significant differences were observed in demographics. After 2 weeks from the baseline, the changes in the complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) were higher in the treatment (4.00±2.62) group than in the control group (1.40±2.34) (p<0.05). The treatment group exhibited significant improvement in the score on the SF-36 questionnaire. The clinical side effects, such as stomachache and borborygmus, were reduced in the moderate constipation patients in the treatment group, according to additional analyses. Conclusions Goodmorning S Granule® , a herbal medicine, was more effective in improving quality of life and CSBM per week and safer in the moderate constipation groups because of the reduced clinical side effects.