1.Treatment of posterior hip dislocation with femoral head fracture using absorbable screw rod system
Xi CHEN ; Tian XIA ; Guohui LIU ; Yongchao WU ; Yi LIU ; Kun ZHA
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 2016;18(5):396-400
Objective To investigate the efficacy of absorbable screw rod system in the treatment of posterior hip dislocation complicated with femoral head fracture.Methods Between February 2009 and June 2014,20 patients were treated at our department for posterior hip dislocation complicated with femoral head fracture.They were 14 males and 6 females,with an average age of 38.2 years (range,from 27 to 60 years).Eight left hips and 12 right hips were affected.By the Pipkin classification,15 cases were type Ⅰ and 5 type Ⅱ.The time from injury to surgery ranged from 3 to 14 days (average,6 days).All of them were treated with absorbable screw rod system after Allis manual reduction.Results The operation time in this group ranged from 1 to 6 hours (average,1.8 hours).The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 70 to 400 mL (average,160 mL).They were followed up for 18 to 48 months (average,32 months).All the fractures united after an average time of 3.4 months (range,from 2.5 to 5.0 months).According to the Harris scores at 6 months postoperation,10 cases were rated as excellent,7 as good,2 as fair and one as poor,with a good to excellent rate of 85.0%.Total hip replacement was performed for 2 fair and one poor cases because their postoperative pain was not relieved and femoral avascular necrosis developed.Conclusion Absorbable screw rod system is an effective treatment of posterior dislocation with femoral head fracture,because it can simplify operative procedures,reduce trauma,fixate the fracture firmly,avoid secondary operation,and reduce postoperative complications.
2.50 Cases of Apoplexy Complicated with Pseudo—Bulbar Paralysis
Yongchao XIA ; Yanyi LI ; Yan HAN ; Wenke XU ; Yaping ZHU ; Youyi DOU ; Minsi ZHANG ; Shaoming LU ; Ling LUO
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine 1993;0(04):-
The self—formulated modified“Blood—activating andQi—benefitting Decoction of Fructus Cirri Sarco-dactylis”with heavy dose of Radix Angelica Sinensiswas applied for the treatment of 50 cases of apoplexycomplicated with pseudo—Bulbar paralysis.The totaleffective rate of dysathria was 98% with a 58% abovemarked effect rate,while the total effective rate for-choking and coughing was 98%,with a 94% abovemarkedly effective rate.
3.Preparation of monoclonal antibodies against 3D protein of EV71 based on HBc particles as expression vector
Yongchao LI ; Rui ZHU ; Longfa XU ; Yangtao WU ; Huan ZHAO ; Kun WU ; Dongxiao LIU ; Tong CHENG ; Ningshao XIA
Chinese Journal of Immunology 2017;33(9):1341-1345
Objective:To prepare and preliminarily identify the monoclonal antibodies(mAbs) specifically against 3D protein of Enterovirus 71(EV71),using bioinformatics to predict the epitopes of 3D,with HBc protein as a carrier.Methods: Artificial screening of 3D protein epitope sequences by bioinformatic method,inserted into the major immunodominant region(MIR) area of Hepatitis B virus core protein(HBc),to construct the recombinant protein.BALB/c mice were immunized with the recombinant virus like particles(VLPs),to prepare the mAbs against 3D protein of EV71.Affinity chromatography technology was used to purify the mAb.The indirect ELISA,ELISPOT,immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry staining methods were used to identify the characteristic of the mAb.Results: We displayed 3D(aa34-43),3D(aa61-76) and 3D(aa151-164) epitopes by constructing fusion protein using HBc VLPs as a vector,after hybridization,one positive hybridoma cell line(3E1) was selected by ELISA.The isotype of 3E1 was IgG2a.The results of immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry staining assay showed that the mAb 3E1 could specifically recognize EV71.Conclusion: The prepared mAb 3E1 can specifically recognizes the EV71,which laid the foundation for the detection of virus and further study on 3D protein,and verified the bioinformatics technology combined with HBc carrier displaying peptides could prepare mAb quickly and efficiently.
4.Safety and immunogenicity of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine
LIU Shuzhen ; MENG Li ; XI Peipei ; ZHANG Yongchao ; FAN Bei ; LI Changgui ; XIA Shengli ; PAN Ruowen
Journal of Preventive Medicine 2020;32(11):1091-1095
Objective :
To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccine.
Methods :
The healthy people aged three years or over in Wuyang County and Xiping County of Henan Province were divided into the experimental group, control group 1 and control group 2, and were vaccinated with split-virion quadrivalent influenza vaccines, split-virion trivalent influenza vaccines (without B/Victoria) and a split-virion trivalent influenza vaccines (without B/Yamagata) , respectively. The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies were detected before and after immunization. The incidence rate of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) , HI antibody positive conversion rate, the protection rate of HI antibodies and the growth of geometric mean titer (GMT) were calculated and compared with the standard of Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Results:
Totally 2 924 people were recruited, with 975 in the experimental group, 974 in the control group 1 and 975 in control group 2. The incidence rate of AEFI in the experimental group was 11.7%, higher than 7.9% in control group 1 and 8.8% in control group 2 (P < 0.05) during 30 minutes and 8 days after inoculation. The positive conversion rates of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv in the experimental group were 78.5%, 53.3%, 78.3% and 62.9%, respectively. The rate differences of the positive conversion rates of HI antibodies of By between the experimental group and control group 2, and of Bv between the experimental group and control group 1 were 42.1% (95%CI: 38.0%-46.2%) and 33.2% (95%CI: 28.9%-37.5%) , with both lower limits of 95%CI more than -0.10. The GMT increase of HI antibodies was more than 2.5 times in the three groups. The protective rates of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv in the experimental group were 87.7%, 98.7%, 93.6% and 77.2%, respectively. The protective rates of HI antibodies of By in control group 2 and Bv in control group 1 were 71.1% and 51.0%, both lower than those in the experimental group (P < 0.05).
Conclusions
After the inoculation of the quadrivalent influenza vaccine, the positive conversion rates (>40%) , protection rates (>70%) and GMT increase (>2.5 times) of HI antibodies of H1N1, H3N2, By and Bv all meet the quality standards of FDA. The safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent influenza vaccine are not inferior to those of the trivalent influenza vaccine.