1.Impact of Early Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury:An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database
Yongseop LEE ; Jun Hye SEO ; Jaeeun SEONG ; Sang Min AHN ; Min HAN ; Jung Ah LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Su Jin JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Joon-Sup YEOM ; Hyung Jung OH ; Nam Su KU
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(43):e276-
Background:
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies.
Methods:
We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively.
Results:
Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237).
Conclusion
Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.
2.Impact of Early Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury:An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database
Yongseop LEE ; Jun Hye SEO ; Jaeeun SEONG ; Sang Min AHN ; Min HAN ; Jung Ah LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Su Jin JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Joon-Sup YEOM ; Hyung Jung OH ; Nam Su KU
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(43):e276-
Background:
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies.
Methods:
We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively.
Results:
Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237).
Conclusion
Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.
3.Impact of Early Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury:An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database
Yongseop LEE ; Jun Hye SEO ; Jaeeun SEONG ; Sang Min AHN ; Min HAN ; Jung Ah LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Su Jin JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Joon-Sup YEOM ; Hyung Jung OH ; Nam Su KU
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(43):e276-
Background:
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies.
Methods:
We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively.
Results:
Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237).
Conclusion
Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.
4.Impact of Early Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy in Patients With Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury:An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database
Yongseop LEE ; Jun Hye SEO ; Jaeeun SEONG ; Sang Min AHN ; Min HAN ; Jung Ah LEE ; Jung Ho KIM ; Jin Young AHN ; Su Jin JEONG ; Jun Yong CHOI ; Joon-Sup YEOM ; Hyung Jung OH ; Nam Su KU
Journal of Korean Medical Science 2024;39(43):e276-
Background:
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an important treatment option for sepsisassociated acute kidney injury (AKI); however, the optimal timing for its initiation remains controversial. Herein, we investigated the clinical outcomes of early continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours of sepsis-associated AKI onset, which was earlier than the initiation time defined in previous studies.
Methods:
We used clinical data sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years who met the sepsis diagnostic criteria and received CKRT because of stage 2 or 3 AKI. Early and late CKRTs were defined as CKRT initiation within 6 hours and after 6 hours of the development of sepsisassociated AKI, respectively.
Results:
Of the 33,236 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 553 underwent CKRT for sepsisassociated AKI. After excluding cases of early mortality and patients with a dialysis history, 45 and 334 patients were included in the early and late CKRT groups, respectively. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality rate was significantly lower in the early CKRT group than in the late CKRT group (26.7% vs. 43.9%, P = 0.035). The early CKRT group also had a significantly greater number of days free of mechanical ventilation (median, 19; interquartile range [IQR], 3–25) and vasopressor administration (median, 21; IQR, 5–26) than the late CKRT group did (median, 10.5; IQR, 0–23; P = 0.037 and median, 13.5;IQR, 0–25; P = 0.028, respectively). The Kaplan–Meier curve also showed that early CKRT initiation was associated with an improved 28-day mortality rate (log-rank test, P = 0.040).In contrast, there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality between patients who started CKRT within 12 hours and those who did not (log-rank test, P = 0.237).
Conclusion
Early CKRT initiation improved the survival of patients with sepsis-associated AKI. Initiation of CKRT should be considered as early as possible after sepsis-associated AKI onset, preferably within 6 hours.
5.Prevalence and Comorbidities of Adult Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity Disorder in a Community Sample from Korea
Young Sup WOO ; Jung Wan HONG ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Hyung Mo SUNG ; Jeong Seok SEO ; Sung-Yong PARK ; Jung Goo LEE ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Won-Myong BAHK
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2023;21(4):798-807
Objective:
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is prevalent in adults, and psychiatric comorbidities are common in adults with ADHD. We aimed to examine the prevalence of adult ADHD with several common psychiatric conditions in a community sample in Korea and the association between adult ADHD and risk of psychiatric comorbidities.
Methods:
This study used a cross-sectional survey design. We provided supplementary and optional self-report questionnaires, including the Korean version of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) short screening scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening for depression, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test alcohol consumption questions, and the Korean version of the Mood Disorders Questionnaire, to Korean adults who visited one of six centers of a large private healthcare company for the National General Health Examination.
Results:
A total of 17,799 subjects included in this study, and 430 (2.4%) were positive on the ASRS screen. ADHD was significantly associated with the 19−30-year-old age group (odds ratio [OR] = 3.938), lower income (OR = 1.298), depression (OR = 11.563), and bipolar disorder (OR = 3.162).
Conclusion
Adult ADHD was highly associated with depression and bipolar disorder, suggesting that clinicians should carefully evaluate and treat such psychiatric disorders in adults with ADHD symptoms.
6.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022:Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines
Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Young Sup WOO ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Jung Goo LEE ; Won KIM ; InKi SOHN ; Sung-Yong PARK ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Jeong Seok SEO ; IL Han CHOO ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Myung Hun JUNG ; Duk-In JON ; Moon-Doo KIM
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2023;21(1):32-48
The objective of this study was to compare recommendations of the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022) with other recently published guidelines for treating bipolar disorder. We reviewed a total of six recently published global treatment guidelines and compared treatment recommendation of the KMAP-BP 2022 with those of other guidelines. For initial treatment of mania, there were no significant differences across treatment guidelines. All guidelines recommended mood stabilizer (MS) or atypical antipsychotic (AAP) monotherapy or a combination of an MS with an AAP as a first-line treatment strategy in a same degree for mania. However, the KMAP-BP 2022 recommended MS + AAP combination therapy for psychotic mania, mixed mania and psychotic depression as treatment of choice. Aripiprazole, quetiapine and olanzapine were the first-line AAPs for nearly all phases of bipolar disorder across guidelines. Some guideline suggested olanzapine is a second-line options during maintenance treatment, related to concern about long-term tolerability. Most guidelines advocated newer AAPs (asenapine, cariprazine, long-acting injectable risperidone, and aripiprazole once monthly) as first-line treatment options for all phases while lamotrigine was recommended for depressive and maintenance phases. Lithium and valproic acid were commonly used as MSs in all phases of bipolar disorder. KMAP-BP 2022 guidelines were similar to other guidelines, reflecting current changes in prescription patterns for bipolar disorder based on accumulated research data. Strong preference for combination therapy was characteristic of KMAP-BP 2022, predominantly in the treatment of psychotic mania, mixed mania and psychotic depression.
7.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022, Fifth Revision: An Executive Summary
Young Sup WOO ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Jung Goo LEE ; Won KIM ; InKi SOHN ; Sung-Yong PARK ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Jeong Seok SEO ; IL Han CHOO ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Myung Hun JUNG ; Duk-In JON ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Bo-Hyun YOON
Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience 2022;20(4):747-761
Objective:
We revised the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP), first published in 2002 and revised in 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2018, to reflect recent progress in the treatment of bipolar disorder.
Methods:
The questionnaires consisted of 56 items for adult patients and 7 items for child/adolescent patients, and were used to obtain the consensus of experts regarding pharmacological treatment strategies for various phases of bipolar disorder. The review committee included 87 Korean psychiatrists and 40 child and adolescent psychiatry experts.
Results:
For treatment of manic episodes, a combination of a mood stabilizer (MS) and atypical antipsychotics (AAP), or monotherapy with MS or AAP were recommended as first-line treatments. Combinations of MS and AAP, or AAP and lamotrigine (LMT) were recommended as first-line treatments for depressive episodes regardless of the severity. Monotherapy with MS, AAP, or LMT were also first-line treatments for mild to moderate depressive episodes. For mixed features, a combination of MS and AAP, or monotherapy with AAP or MS were recommended as first-line treatments, and a combination of AAP and LMT, or MS and LMT were the first-line treatments for depressive mixed state.
Conclusion
The recommendations of the KMAP-BP 2022 have changed from the previous version, to reflect the evolution of the social culture and healthcare system in Korea and recent evidence regarding pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder. The KMAP-BP 2022 provides clinicians with a wealth of information regarding appropriate strategies to treat patients with bipolar disorder.
8.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022:Rapid Cycling
Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Young Sup WOO ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Jeong Seok SEO ; IL Han CHOO ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Won KIM ; Jung Goo LEE ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Sung-Yong PARK ; InKi SOHN ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Myung Hun JUNG ; Duk-In JON
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2022;61(3):204-213
Objectives:
This study revised the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2018 for rapid cycling.
Methods:
Questionnaires to survey the expert opinion of medication for rapid cycling were completed by a review committee consisting of 87 Korean expert psychiatrists. The experts’ opinions were classified into three categories based on the lowest category in which the confidence interval fell (6.5≤ for first-line, 3.5≤ for second-line, and 3.5> for third-line treatment).
Results:
The first-line treatments were a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, or mood stabilizer monotherapy. Furthermore, a mood stabilizer with lamotrigine therapy and an atypical antipsychotic with lamotrigine combinations was the first-line treatment for a depressive episode. The first-line medications in all episodes were valproate, lithium, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole. Risperidone was the first-line medication in manic episodes and mixed states, and lamotrigine was the first-line medication for treating depressive episodes.
Conclusion
Compared to the surveys in 2018, the preference for atypical antipsychotics and lamotrigine has increased, and the modalities as a second-line treatment are more diversified.
9.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022: Children and Adolescents
Chan-Mo YANG ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Young Sup WOO ; Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Jeong Seok SEO ; IL Han CHOO ; Won KIM ; Jung Goo LEE ; Myung Hun JUNG ; Duk-In JON ; Sung-Yong PARK ; InKi SOHN ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Bo-Hyun YOON ; Se-Hoon SHIM
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2022;61(3):224-236
Objectives:
The objective of this study was to revise the Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) 2022: children and adolescents.
Methods:
We performed a survey, using a questionnaire comprising 23 questions according to various situations facing children and adolescents with bipolar disorders. A total of 40 of the 60 experts in child and adolescent psychiatry responded to the survey.
Results:
The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic and depressive episodes in children with bipolar disorders were a combination of mood stabilizer (MS) and atypical antipsychotics (AAP). The first-line medications selected for these children were aripiprazole (treatment of choice, TOC) and risperidone. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for manic episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP (TOC), monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole, risperidone, and quetiapine were selected as first-line medications for these adolescents. First-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for depressive episodes in adolescents were a combination of MS and an AAP, monotherapy with MS, and monotherapy with an AAP. The first-line pharmacotherapeutic strategies for the depressive episodes in adolescents at high risk for bipolar disorder were a combination of MS and AAP and monotherapy with an AAP. Lithium, valproate, aripiprazole (TOC), quetiapine, and risperidone were selected as first-line medications for the treatment of depressive episodes in adolescents with bipolar disorder.
Conclusion
It is expected that the present KMAP-BP 2022: children and adolescents will give the direction and be usefully applied by clinicians to treat children and adolescents with bipolar disorders.
10.Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder 2022: Maintenance Therapy
Jung Goo LEE ; Won-Myong BAHK ; Young Sup WOO ; Jong-Hyun JEONG ; Jeong Seok SEO ; IL Han CHOO ; Chan-Mo YANG ; Won KIM ; Se-Hoon SHIM ; Myung Hun JUNG ; Duk-In JON ; Sung-Yong PARK ; InKi SOHN ; Moon-Doo KIM ; Bo-Hyun YOON
Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2022;61(3):214-223
Objectives:
In this study, we investigated and organized the maintenance-treatment strategies for Bipolar I and II disorders outlined in The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar disorder 2022 (KMAP-BP 2022).
Methods:
The questionnaire sought to survey expert opinion on medication for bipolar disorders and was completed by a review committee consisting of 87 experienced Korean psychiatrists. It comprised 56 questions, and each question included various sub-items. The questionnaire for the maintenance treatments covered overall treatment strategies after acute mood episodes in bipolar I and II disorders, the choice of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics and antidepressants, duration of medication, and treatment strategies for breakthrough symptoms.
Results:
In the case of bipolar I disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and a combination of mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics were selected as the first-line treatments. In maintenance management of bipolar II disorder, mood stabilizer monotherapy, atypical antipsychotics monotherapy, and combinations of mood stabilizers were selected as the preferred first-line treatments.
Conclusion
There has been a growing body of evidence that atypical antipsychotics have a greater preference than observed in the previous KMAP-BP of 2018. Also, monotherapy of mood stabilizers or atypical antipsychotics was more frequently selected in KMAP-BP 2022 than in the KMAP-BP 2018.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail