A 34 year old male patient underwent emergency operation of tracheal resection and primary end-to-end anastomosis to correct of tracheal stenosis following tracheostomy. On admission, a No. 3 Magill plastic Portex tracheostomy tube had been placed in the previous tracheostomy opening. Stenotic narrowing was noted 4 cm above carina. Despite of severe narrowing of the lesion, anesthetic course was uneventful with nitrous oxide, oxygen and halothane by controlled respiration and serial blood gas analyses. Postoperative courses were also favorable with adequate respiratory cares. It is mandatory to perform serial blood gas analyses for the management of corrective operation on tracheal stenosis.
Adult ; Blood Gas Analysis ; Emergencies ; Halothane ; Humans ; Male ; Nitrous Oxide ; Oxygen ; Plastics ; Respiration ; Tracheal Stenosis* ; Tracheostomy

It has recently been reported that chemical evaluations of a new benzodiazepine derivative, flunitrazepam (Ro 5-4200) revealed promising effects as premedicant. We studied on effects of premedication by double blind technique comparing flunitrazepam (Ro 5-4200) 0.03mg/kg I.M. and meperidine HCI 1mg/kg I.M. in 300 cases of preoperative patient by random selection. The questionaire on drowsiness, sleepiness and awareness during transport to the operation theatre, as well as nausea and vomiting were checked by anesthetists who were ignorant of the given premedicant. Following results were obtained; 1) Flunitrazepam has excellent calming effects in preanesthetic period, inducing drowsiness and adequate rest. 2) Flunitrazepam produces good sleep the night before operation. 3) Flunitrazepam has lower incidence of nausea and vomiting than that cf meperidine HCI.
Benzodiazepines ; Flunitrazepam* ; Humans ; Incidence ; Meperidine* ; Nausea ; Premedication ; Sleep Stages ; Vomiting

PURPOSE: There has been debate on the use of peritoneal irrigation and drainage following gastric cancer surgery. This study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of routine peritoneal irrigation and drainage following gastric cancer surgery, especially with regard to the perioperative leukocyte count. METHODS: Of 298 patients, 153 were enrolled in the test group (without peritoneal irrigation & drainage), between October 2001 and August 2002, and 145 in the control group (with peritoneal irrigation and drainage), between January 2001 and September 2001. The demographics, range of dissection, pathological staging, operation times, anesthesia times, fever, perioperative leukocyte counts and operative complications were retrospectively analyzed in these consecutive patients. RESULTS: It was found that there was no difference in the demographics, range of dissection, pathological staging and operative complications between the two groups. However, the operation times, anesthesia times, and mean length of hospitalization in the test group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. No significance differences were found between the two groups with regard to the perioperative leukocyte counts. CONCLUSION: The routine usage of peritoneal irrigation and drainage was found to be neither safe nor effective in gastric cancer surgery patients.
Anesthesia ; Demography ; Drainage* ; Fever ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Leukocyte Count* ; Leukocytes* ; Peritoneal Lavage* ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms*