BACKGROUND: Dematophytes are classified into geophilic, zoophilic and anthrophilic fungi, based on their ecological traits. Zoophilic dermatophytosis primarily is responsible for infection in animals, and the inflammatory reaction often tends to be more severe than skin lesions inflicted by anthrophilic species. For the clinical manifestation of superficial dermatophytosis caused by these zoophilic dermatophyte are highly variable, a through review of history about the contact with these animals is often solicited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate clinical and epidemiological zoophilic dermatophytosis associated with animal contact, in an effort to elucidate the link between the causative organism and the route of infection. METHOD: We performed clinical and mycological study on 63 cases of dermatophytosis associated with prior animal contact at the department of dermatology, Konkuk University Hospital from September 2004 to August 2005. RESULT: The ratio of male to female patient was 1: 1.17 and showed more prevalence in female. The age distribution of patients was highest in the age group of 10 years (22.2%). The exposed area (71.4%) was more frequently affected than unexposed area (28.6%) and the most common site was face and forearm. Single lesions were 41 cases (65.1%). Dogs, cats, and rabbits were the most common culprits in animal contact-associated dermatophytosis, each comprising 19, 15, and 10 respectively, of total cases. Hamsters, Guinea pigs, miniature pigs, and miscellaneous (cattles and birds) were among other causative animals. Twenty nine patients with dermatophytosis had accompanying diseases. In the age group of under 10 years old, 6 patients were being treated with atopic dermatitis; in the age group of under 40 yrs, 15 were being treated with diabetes, and 3 with pulmonary tuberculosis, and 1 with rheumatoid arthritis. These evidences support the fact that underlying conditions renders patients susceptible to opportunistic infections. In all age groups, M. canis and T. mentagraphytes var. mentagraphytes were the most predominant species, with most of them in the age groups of teens and twenties. In patients who had contact with dogs, M. canis was recovered in 8 cases, T. mentagraphytes var. mentagraphytes in 7 and M. gypseum in 3. In those patients who had contact with cats, M. canis was found in 6, and T. mentagraphytes var. mentagraphytes in 3, M. gypseum in 2, and T. verrucosum in 1 case. In those who had contact with hamsters, 2 cases each of M. canis, T. mentagraphytes var. mentagraphytes, and M. gypseum were recovered. CONCLUSION: As evidenced above, contact with specific animals play an important role in the pathogenesis of dermatomycosis. As the leisure and recreational activities of people become more diverse and more extensive, and as the influx of exotic domestic animals increases, and frequent contact with people from abroad makes the manifestation of this disease more complex, it would be wise for us to strive to come up with an effective strategy for prevention and epidemiological studies.
Adolescent ; Age Distribution ; Animals* ; Animals, Domestic ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Arthrodermataceae ; Cats ; Child ; Cricetinae ; Dermatitis, Atopic ; Dermatology ; Dermatomycoses ; Dogs ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Female ; Forearm ; Fungi ; Guinea Pigs ; Humans ; Leisure Activities ; Male ; Opportunistic Infections ; Prevalence ; Rabbits ; Skin ; Swine ; Tinea* ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary