Objective To compare different drainage methods after right hepatectomy. Methods From April 2017 to February 2018, 90 patients who underwent right hepatectomy at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University were prospectively randomized to the latex tube group (right subphrenic drain with a latex tube connecting to a collection bag, n=30), the silicone tube group (right subphrenic drain with a silicone tube connecting to a closed-suction, n=30) or the combination group ( right subphrenic drain with a latex tub, combined with a silicone tube, n=30). The amount of fluid collection after the operation, complications after surgery, recovery of liver function, and length of hospital stay after operation were compared. Results There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological features among the 3 groups, including gender, age, cirrhosis status, extent of hepatectomy, and blood loss (P＞0. 05). There were no significant differences among the three groups on the incidences of postoperative complications [ the latex tube group, 20. 0% (6/30); the silicone tube group, 23. 3% (7/30); the combination group, 16. 7% (5/30); P＞0. 05]. Ultrasonography showed significantly lower rates of subphrenic collection in the combination group compared with the latex tube group and the silicone tube group [16. 7% (5/30) vs. 63. 3% (19/30) vs. 53. 3% (16/30); P＜0. 05]. The rates of postoperative fever, serum total bilirubin, ALT and postoperative hospital stay were similar among the three groups (P＞0. 05). Conclusions Drainage using the combina-tion of a latex tube connecting to a collection bag and a silicone tube connecting to closed-suction after right hepatectomy significantly reduced postoperatively subphrenic collection and prevented infection of the collec-tion. However, the treatment strategy did not delay liver function recovery, prolong hospital stay nor increase post-operative infection rate.

Objective To investigate the safety of young recipients undergoing living donor renal transplantation from elderly relative donors through long-term follow-up of the pathological changes. Methods According to the age of donors, 28 young recipients were divided into the observation group (n=14, elderly donors) and control group (n=14, young and middle-aged donors). The 7-year survival after renal transplantation, the serum creatinine (Scr) levels at various postoperative time points were compared between two groups. The chronic pathological injury scores of renal allograft biopsy at time-zero, postoperative 6-month and 7-year were compared between two groups. The expression levels of renal interstitial fibrosis indicators connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, laminin (LN), fibronectin (FN), cell senescence indicators intercellular connexin (Cx)-43 and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) at postoperative 6-month and 7-year were compared between two groups. Results The 7-year survival rates in the observation and control groups were 78.5% and 92.8% with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). In the observation and control groups, the levels of Scr were 190 and 160 μmol/L at the postoperative 7 d, and 170 and 125 μmol/L at postoperative 1 month. At each postoperative time point, the levels of Scr in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P > 0.05). The total chronic pathological injury scores of renal transplant biopsy at time-zero in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P > 0.05), whereas the total chronic pathological injury scores at postoperative 7-year did not significantly differ between two groups (P > 0.05). Within either group, the total chronic pathological injury scores at postoperative 7-year was remarkably higher than those at time-zero and postoperative 6-month (both P < 0.05). The expression levels of CTGF, TGF-β, LN, FN, mTOR, Cx43 of renal transplant tissue at postoperative 7-year did not significantly differ between two groups (all P > 0.05). Conclusions The long-term follow-up outcomes demonstrate that the pathological changes of young recipients undergoing renal transplantation from elderly donors are similar to those from young and middle-aged donors. It is safe and feasible for young recipients to undergo renal transplantation from elderly donors in the pathological perspective.