Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common and malignant tumor in the field of digestive system.Surgery still is potential method to cure pancreatic cancer.Laparoscopic surgery with the advantage of minimal invasion has been applied in the treatment of benign and low malignant tumors,but it is in great controversy whether laparoscopic surgery could be used in treatment of pancreatic cancer.This study reviews the literatures of laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic cancer and the clinical outcomes,and explores its current development and prospects.

Objective To summarize our experience in the management of stones impacted at cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC). Methods There were 58 patients with stones impacted at cystic duct during LC from July 1997 to June 2001.Cystic duct was incised to remove stones first,then intraoperative cholangiography was performed.If stones were found in common bile duct,they would be taken out by intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy or open operation. Results All the impacted stones in 58 patients were removed successfully.51 coses underwent LC.Intraoperative cholangiography showed there were common bile duct stones in 7 cases.For these 7 coses,5 cases were treated by LC combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and other 2 cases were converted into open operation.No Severe complication occurred. Conclusions Nearly all cases with stones impacted at cystic duct can receive LC by removing impacted stones through incising the cystic duct and intraoperative cholangiography.If there are any stones in common bile duct,they can be removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Objective To evaluate the management strategy for gallbladder carcinoma found during the procedure of intended laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) Methods Twenty one cases of primary gallbladder carcinoma were incidently found during a period of 1996-2003, among them 17 cases of Nevin stage Ⅱ、Ⅲ and Ⅳ were divided into group A (6 cases) converted to open radical resection, and group B (11 cases) treated by LC ? 2 test and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to analyze postoperative survival rates Results (1) Two Nevin stage Ⅰ cases are still alive for 6 and 47 months at a follow up after LC; (2) For stage Ⅱ、 Ⅲ and Ⅳ patients, open surgery resulted a much longer survival ( ? 2=4 55, P =0 0328) Conclusion (1) For Nevin stage Ⅰ patients, simple LC is enough; (2) Patients of Nevin stage Ⅱ、 Ⅲ and Ⅳ should be coverted to open radical resection

Objective To explore the clinical efficacies of open and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adult patients with congenital choledochal cyst.Methods The clinical data of 36 adult patients with congenital choledochal cysts who were admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from February 2008 to February 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Twenty-four patients underwent common bile duct cyst resection + cholecystectomy +biliojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (open surgery group),12 patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct cyst resection + cholecystectomy + biliojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis (laparoscopy group).The intraoperative conditions,detection indexes and postoperative recovery indexes in the 2 groups were analyzed.The follow-up by regular outpatient examination and telephone interview were done up to March 2015.Non-normal distribution data were described as M(P25,P75).Comparison between groups was analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact probability.Measurement data with normal distribution were presented as (x) ± s and analyzed using t test.Count data were evaluated by the ratio and proportion.Results The operation time of the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 238 minutes (191 minutes,283 minutes) and 270 minutes (225 minutes,326 minutes),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-1.360,P ＞ 0.05).The volume of intraoperative blood loss in the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 200 mL (113 mL,363 mL) and 75 mL(50 mL,138 mL),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-3.377,P ＜0.05).The level of C-reactive protein in the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 94 mg/L (81 mg/L,104 mg/L) and 29 mg/L (21 mg/L,61 mg/L),with a significant difference between the 2 groups (Z =-4.296,P ＜0.05).The pain scores at postoperative day 3,time to anal exsufflation,time for fluid diet intake and duration of hospital stay of the open surgery group and laparoscopy group were 2.5 ± 0.9,(3.7 ± 1.0) days,(5.0 ± 1.6) days,(10.0 ± 2.7) days and 1.9 ±0.3,(2.6 ± 1.0) days,(3.6 ± 1.6) days,(7.8 ± 2.2) days,respectively,showing significant differences between the 2 groups (t =3.146,3.286,2.450,2.523,P ＜ 0.05).Nine patients in the open surgery group and 3 patients in the laparoscopy group had the complications,with improvement of conditions after symptomatic treatment,showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P ＞ 0.05).All the 36 patients were followed up for a median time of 36 months (range,1-72 months) with good recovery,without long-term postoperative complications and re-operation.Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of adult patients with congenital choledochal cyst is safe and feasible,with the advantages of less intraoperative bleeding,less surgical trauma,fast recovery compared with open surgery.

Objective To investigate clinical efficacy of Easy First strategy in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.Methods The clinical data of 9 patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who were admitted to the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University (8 patients) and Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (1 patient) from June 2013 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.Nine patients underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy based on the Easy First strategy (to sequentially dissect and amputate jejunum,stomach,hepatoduodenal ligament,common bile duct,main portal vein,head of pancreas,second segment and third segment of the duodenum,uncinate process and neck of pancreas).The operation time,volume of intraoperative blood loss,postoperative pathological examination,complications and duration of hospital stay were recorded.Patients were followed up once every 3 months by outpatient examination and telephone interview up to June 2015.Results Of 9 patients,4 received totally laparoscopic PD (2 received partial resection and repair of portal venous wall),1 received laparoscopic assisted resection and digestive tract reconstruction,and 4 received laparoscopic transection of jejunum,bile tract and stomach and conversion to open surgery for resection and digestive tract reconstruction (1 with severe adhesion between tumor and portal vein,3 with bleeding due to dissection of neck and unciform process of pancreas).The operation time and volume of intraoperative blood loss in all patients and in 4 patients with totally laparoscopic PD were (404 ± 49) minutes and (456 ± 348) mL,(395 ± 61) minutes and (188 ± 25) mL,respectively.Of 9 patients,5 with postoperative complications were cured without perioperative death,including 2 with Grade B pancreatic fistula,1 with biliary leakage,1 receiving reoperation due to gastric stump bleeding at postoperative day 7 and 1 with abdominal infection.The extubation time of right drainage tube and left drainage tube was (9 ± 5) days and (11 ± 4) days,respectively.The duration of hospital stay was (24 ± 10)days.All patients were diagnosed as with pancreatic cancer by pathological examinations with the tumor diameter of (3.2 ± 0.8) cm.The number of harvested lymph nodes in all patients and in 4 patients with totally laparoscopic PD were 16.8 (range,6.0-25.0) and 19.8 (range,15.0-25.0).All the patients were followed up for mean time of 12 months (range,4-24 months),including 1 death at postoperative month 3,1 with tumor survival of 20 months and others with tumor-free survival.The postoperative survival time of 4 patients was more than 18 months at the end of follow-up.Conclusion Easy First strategy in laparoscopic PD is safe,feasible and practical for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Objective To evaluate the short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) for gastric cancer.Methods After studying the patients' demographic data,extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy,as well as differentiation and tumor TNM stage,85 patients who underwent LAG were individually matched to 85 patients who underwent open surgery (OG) between October 2004 and March 2008.The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative recovery,complications,pathological findings,and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.Results The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LAG group than in the OG group (277 ± 62) min vs.(211 ±46) min,t =7.882,P ＜0.05,whereas intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (161 ±90) ml vs.(267 ± 141) ml,t =-5.854,P ＜0.05.In addition,there was a significant reduction in the time to first flatus and postoperative hospital stay (3.7 ± 1.3) days vs.(4.2 ± 1.1) days and (10 ± 3) days vs.(12 ± 6) days,respectively t =-2.318,-2.325,P ＜ 0.05.There was no significant difference between the LAG group and OG group with regard to the number of harvested lymph nodes and overall postoperative complications.The 5-year disease-free survival rates and overall survival rates were 76％,78％,respectively,in LAG group and 75％,73％,respectively in OG group (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions LAG is suitable and minimally invasive for treating gastric cancer.Compared to OG,the LAG will not increase the risk of recurrence and mortality after surgery.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for gastric cancer by systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods The literature database before February,2012 was extensively searched to retrieve the comparative studies of LATG and open total gastrectomy(OTG) with a relevance of study goal.The inclusion and exclusion criteria were formulated.Aftera quality evaluation,the data was extracted.The Cochrane collaboration RevMan 5.1 version software was used for meta-analysis.Results There are ten studies meeting the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis.The total sample size of these studies was 942 cases.Compared to OTG,LATG experienced longer operation time [weighted mean difference(WMD) =41.12 min,95％ confidence interval(CI):20.62-61.63,P ＜0.01)],less blood loss(WMD =-198.36 ml,95％ CI:-300.94--95.78,P ＜ 0.01),earlier time to flatus(WMD =-0.80 days,95％ CI:-1.17--0.42,P＜0.01),shorter hospital stay(WMD =-4.02days,95％ CI:-6.03--2.01,P ＜ 0.01) and decrease in overall complications [relative risk (RR) =0.55,95％ CI:0.40-0.76,P ＜ 0.01)].The number of dissected lymph nodes,proximal or distal resection margin and mortality were similar between the two groups.Conclusions Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with less blood loss,less overall complications and quick recovery.

Objective To assess the value of multi-slice computer tomography enterography (MSCTE) in demonstrating small intestinal diseases.Methods MSCTE was performed with iso-osmotic manitol (2.5%) as oral contrast in 98 patients with various kinds of suspected small intestinal diseases.All patients were inter- viewed about their tolerance of the procedure.Demonstration of features of various kinds of small intestinal dis- eases was analyzed.MSCTE diagnosis of different small intestinal diseases were compared with the final clinical diagnosis.Results The procedure was acceptable by all patients and no obvious complication was found. MSCTE was performed for 2 patients because of the failure of conventional small bowel enteroclysis.CT features of many kinds of diseases such as tumors,Crohn's disease were clearly displayed.The sensitivity of MSCTE was 96.5% (83/86),accuracy 90.8% (89/98).Conclusion MSCTE is a simple,rapid,noninvasive and effective method in evaluating small intestinal diseases.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is technically safe and feasible with advantage of minimally invasive feature, and has become a routine procedure in some minimally invasive pancreatic centers. However, LPD is complicated to be operated and will take a long time to operate proficiently. How to successfully promote LPD application has become a key issue in the new era. This article focuses on the key issues in how to promote LPD application safely in primary hospitals, whether LPD can be used for malignant tumors, and how to cultivate new generation LPD experts.

Objective: To summarize the incidence and characteristics of postoperative complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD), and to share our experience on management of complications. Methods: The clinical data of 320 LPD performed by a single team in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Zhejiang Provincial People′s Hospital between September 2012 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, among which there were 196 males and 124 females with age of (60.2±11.6) years old.There were 306 patients who underwent standard LPD, and 14 patients who underwent extended LPD. The patients were divided into 2 groups of former 160 LPD and later 160 LPD according to the time order. By analyzing the differences of clinical outcomes between the two groups, especially focusing on the incidence of postoperative complications.The experience on management of complications was concluded. The prior surgical history of latter group was significantly higher than the former group(30.0%(48/160)vs. 18.8%(30/160), χ²=5.49, P=0.019), and the rest of baseline characteristics remained the comparable (P>0.05). For resectable lesions, LPD was performed by "No back" approach, following the principle of "From distal to cephalad, from ventral to dorsal, and from left to right" . As for the borderline resectable patients, LPD was performed by "Easy first" strategy. Student t test, χ² test or Fisher test was used to analyzed the data between the two groups respectively. Results: Of 320 LPD patients, 306 cases underwent standard LPD, 14 cases underwent LPD with resection of other organs.There were 278 LPD cases who followed "No back" approach, and 42 cases who followed "Easy first" strategy because of difficulty in creating the retro-pancreatic tunnel. And the overall morbidity was 32.2%(103/320) with reoperation rate of 5.3%(17/320). The perioperative mortality was 0.6%(2/320). The operation time of latter group was ((346.6±48.8)minutes), which was shorter than that of former group((358.0±54.4)minutes)(t=1.97, P=0.048). The blood loss of former and latter group remained comparable((207.9±135.8)ml vs.(189.6±121.4)ml, P=0.205). However, in subgroup analysis, the patients with blood loss less <200 ml of latter group decreased significantly from 59.4%(95/160) to 47.5%(76/160)(χ²=4.53, P=0.033). The overall morbidity of latter group was 28.8%(46/160), indicated a decrease from 35.6%(57/160) of former group without significant difference(P=0.188). Moreover, Grade A/B/C pancreatic fistula rate, Grade A/C bile leakage rate, Grade B/C postoperative hemorrhage rate of the later group tended to decrease, although they also didn′t reach a significant difference. However, the abdominal infection rate decreased significantly(χ²=3.93, P=0.047). The length of hospital stay remained comparable(P=0.156). Conclusions The most common complications after LPD were postoperative hemorrhage and pancreatic fistula. With specialized team and accumulated experience, the morbidity can decrease progressively by analyzing the leading cause and improving the technical skills.