1.Prevalence of Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Malaysian Patients with Hypertension
Wong Jin Shyan ; Rawa Bau ; Fazlina Ahmad ; Rosmadi Ismail ; Alan Fong Yean Yip
The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2013;68(2):141-143
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually asymptomatic and often
associated with established cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension. The prevalence atrial fibrillation in patients admitted to Malaysian hospitals has been determined, but asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (AAF) in hypertensive patients in the primary care setting is not established. This study reports the prevalence of AAF in hypertensive patients in Malaysia, in a primary care setting. The overall prevalence of AAF was 0.75% with no differences between the gender.
The prevalence of AAF increases with age – in the age
groups of 30-39, >40-49, >50-59, >60-69, 70-79 and >80 years old were 0%, 0.17%, 0.35%, 2.32%, 2.59%, and 0%
respectively. Hypertensive patients with age of ≥ 61 year old were associated with a probability of 10.6 times higher for AAF. We suggest the age threshold to screen for AAF to be age of 60. It is estimated that there are 49,029 Malaysians with AAF in 2010. A large population is at risk of AAF-related complications. There is justification for an even greater emphasis on diagnostic, primary and secondary prevention strategies.
2.Short-term outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin in a real-world setting.
Yan Li SHAO ; Kuan Hao YEE ; Seow Ken KOH ; Yip Fong WONG ; Lee Ying YEOH ; Serena LOW ; Chee Fang SUM
Singapore medical journal 2018;59(5):251-256
INTRODUCTIONWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of canagliflozin as compared to sitagliptin in a real-world setting among multiethnic patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Singapore.
METHODSThis was a new-user, active-comparator, single-centre retrospective cohort study. Patients aged 18-69 years with T2DM and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m were eligible for inclusion if they were initiated and maintained on a steady daily dose of canagliflozin 300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg between 1 May and 31 December 2014, and followed up for 24 weeks.
RESULTSIn total, 57 patients (canagliflozin 300 mg, n = 22; sitagliptin 100 mg, n = 35) were included. The baseline patient characteristics in the two groups were similar, with overall mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 9.4% ± 1.4%. The use of canagliflozin 300 mg was associated with greater reductions in HbA1c (least squares [LS] mean change -1.6% vs. -0.4%; p < 0.001), body weight (LS mean change -3.0 kg vs. 0.2 kg; p < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (LS mean change: -9.7 mmHg vs. 0.4 mmHg; p < 0.001), as compared with sitagliptin 100 mg. About half of the patients on canagliflozin 300 mg reported mild osmotic diuresis-related side effects that did not lead to drug discontinuation.
CONCLUSIONOur findings suggest that canagliflozin was more effective than sitagliptin in reducing HbA1c, body weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with T2DM, although its use was associated with an increased incidence of mild osmotic diuresis-related side effects.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Blood Glucose ; drug effects ; Blood Pressure ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weight ; Canagliflozin ; administration & dosage ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ; drug therapy ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Hemoglobins ; analysis ; Humans ; Hypoglycemic Agents ; administration & dosage ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Osmosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Singapore ; Sitagliptin Phosphate ; administration & dosage ; Systole ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
3.Chapter of Gastroenterologists professional guidance for management of patients with liver disease in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Jason Pik Eu CHANG ; Yu Jun WONG ; Wei Lyn YANG ; Kieron Boon Leng LIM ; Poh Seng TAN ; Gim Hin HO ; Benjamin Cherng Hann YIP ; James Weiquan LI ; Chern Hao CHONG ; David Eng Hui ONG ; Tju Siang CHUA ; Charles Kien Fong VU ; Kok Ann GWEE ; Tiing Leong ANG ; Chee Kiat TAN
Singapore medical journal 2020;61(12):619-623
In this paper, we aim to provide professional guidance to clinicians who are managing patients with chronic liver disease during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore. We reviewed and summarised the available relevant published data on liver disease in COVID-19 and the advisory statements that were issued by major professional bodies, such as the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver, contextualising the recommendations to our local situation.
COVID-19/epidemiology*
;
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy*
;
Chronic Disease
;
Hepatitis B, Chronic/therapy*
;
Hepatitis C, Chronic/therapy*
;
Humans
;
Liver Cirrhosis/therapy*
;
Liver Diseases/therapy*
;
Liver Neoplasms/therapy*
;
Liver Transplantation
;
Singapore/epidemiology*