Objective:To explore the cognition, recognition and knowledge needs of the parents of outpatient children with aerosol inhalation therapy, so as to provide a reference for the development of effective health education and improve the nursing satisfaction of the parents of the children.Methods:This study was a cross-sectional study. From March 2020 to March 2021, convenience sampling was used to select 260 parents of children who were treated with aerosol inhalation therapy in the Pediatric Clinic of the Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital affiliated to Tsinghua University as the research subject. The self-made Aerosol Inhalation Therapy Related Knowledge Questionnaire was used to investigate the parents.Results:A total of 260 questionnaires were issued, and 243 valid questionnaires were returned with the valid response rate of 93.5%.The total cognitive score of aerosol inhalation therapy of the parents of children was (50.33±8.38) , and the total score of aerosol inhalation therapy attitude was (17.86±2.61) . A total of 31.7% (77/243) of the children 's parents believed that they needed knowledge about aerosol inhalation therapy very much, and 58.4% (142/243) of the children 's parents believed that they needed knowledge about aerosol inhalation therapy, and 67.9% (165/243) of the children 's parents preferred to obtain knowledge about aerosol inhalation therapy through face-to-face demonstrations. Conclusions:Parents of outpatient children have a high degree of recognition of aerosol inhalation therapy, and hope to get relevant knowledge and education. Nursing staff should mainly take face-to-face demonstrations, supplemented by videos and education manuals to carry out health education to parents of children, so as to improve the nursing satisfaction of parents of children.

Objective:To investigate the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on plasma concentration, clinical efficacy and safety of colistin sulfate.Methods:Clinical data of patients received with colistin sulfate were retrospectively analyzed from our group's previous clinical registration study, which was a prospective, multicenter observation study on the efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics of colistin sulfate in patients with severe infection in intensive care unit (ICU). According to whether patients received blood purification treatment, they were divided into CRRT group and non-CRRT group. Baseline data (gender, age, whether complicated with diabetes, chronic nervous system disease, etc), general data (infection of pathogens and sites, steady-state trough concentration, steady-state peak concentration, clinical efficacy, 28-day all-cause mortality, etc) and adverse event (renal injury, nervous system, skin pigmentation, etc) were collected from the two groups.Results:A total of 90 patients were enrolled, including 22 patients in the CRRT group and 68 patients in the non-CRRT group. ① There was no significant difference in gender, age, basic diseases, liver function, infection of pathogens and sites, colistin sulfate dose between the two groups. Compared with the non-CRRT group, the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) were higher in the CRRT group [APACHE Ⅱ: 21.77±8.26 vs. 18.01±6.34, P < 0.05; SOFA: 8.5 (7.8, 11.0) vs. 6.0 (4.0, 9.0), P < 0.01], serum creatinine level was higher [μmol/L: 162.0 (119.5, 210.5) vs. 72.0 (52.0, 117.0), P < 0.01]. ② Plasma concentration: there was no significant difference in steady-state trough concentration between CRRT group and non-CRRT group (mg/L: 0.58±0.30 vs. 0.64±0.25, P = 0.328), nor was there significant difference in steady-state peak concentration (mg/L: 1.02±0.37 vs. 1.18±0.45, P = 0.133). ③ Clinical efficacy: there was no significant difference in clinical response rate between CRRT group and non-CRRT group [68.2% (15/22) vs. 80.9% (55/68), P = 0.213]. ④ Safety: acute kidney injury occurred in 2 patients (2.9%) in the non-CRRT group. No obvious neurological symptoms and skin pigmentation were found in the two groups. Conclusions:CRRT had little effect on the elimination of colistin sulfate. Routine blood concentration monitoring (TDM) is warranted in patients received with CRRT.