Castleman disease (CD) is an uncommon non-clonal lymphoproliferative disorder with unknown etiology.No standard therapy is recommended for relapsed/refractory CD patients,thus requiring development of novel experimental approaches.Our cohort of three adult patients with multicentric CD (MCD) were treated with refractory to traditional chemotherapy ienalidomide-containing regimens (10-25 mg lenalidomide perorally administered on days 1-21 in 28-day cycle) as second-to fourth-line treatment.Partial remission was achieved in first plasma-cell CD patient,who relapsed seven months after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and then failed to respond to four cycles of chemotherapy.Partial remission was obtained in second patient with CD and polyneuropathy,organomegaly,endocrinopathy,monoclonal gammopathy,and skin changes syndrome.Third case showed complete remission with complete disappearance of pleural effusion and ascites and normalization of platelet count.To conclude,encouraging clinical responses were achieved in cohort of three patients with lenalidomide-based regimen,though long-term efficacy remains to be observed.We propose further investigation of therapeutic potential of this drug in treating MCD.

A CALLG2008 protocol was developed by the Chinese Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cooperative Group for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).We retrospectively analyzed 153 newly diagnosed adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive ALL enrolled into imatinib (400 mg/d) plus CALLG2008 regimen between 2009 and 2015.The median age was 40 years (range,18-68 years),with 81 (52.3％) males.The overall hematologic complete remission (CR) rate was 96.7％ after induction.With a median follow-up of 24.2 months,the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 49.5％ (95％ confidence interval (CI):38.5％-59.5％) and 49.2％ (95％ CI:38.3％-59.2％),respectively.Fifty-eight (36 with haploidentical donor) patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in first CR.Among the patients in CR1 after induction,both the 3-year OS and EFS were significantly better in the allo-HSCT group than in the without allo-HSCT group (73.2％,95％ CI:58.3％-83.5％ vs.22.2％,95％ CI:8.7％-39.6％ and 66.5％,95％ CI:50.7％-78.2％ vs.16.1％,95％ CI:5.1％-32.7％,respectively).Multivariate analysis showed that allo-HSCT and achievement of major molecular response were associated with favorable OS or EFS independently.Interestingly,in the allo-HSCT cohort,the donor type (haploidentical versus matched donors) had no significant impact on EFS or OS.All these results suggested that imatinib plus CALLG2008 was an effective protocol for Ph-positive ALL.Haploidentical donors can also be a reasonable alternative expedient donor pool.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic or symptomatic infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can be followed by reinfection. The protection conferred by prior infection among coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is unclear. We assessed the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and the protection effect of previous infection against reinfection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for publications up until the end date of May 1, 2021. The reinfection rate of recovered patients and the protection against reinfection were analyzed using meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies of 1096 reinfection patients were included. The pooled reinfection rate was 0.65% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.98%). The symptomatic reinfection rate was a bit lower (0.37% [95% CI 0.11-0.78%], I2 = 99%). The reinfection rate was much higher in high-risk populations (1.59% [95% CI 0.30-3.88%], I2 = 90%). The protection against reinfection and symptomatic reinfection was similar (87.02% [95% CI 83.22-89.96%] and 87.17% [95% CI 83.09-90.26%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS The rate of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is relatively low. The protection against SARS-CoV-2 after natural infection is comparable to that estimated for vaccine efficacy. These data may help guide public health measures and vaccination strategies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. High-quality clinical studies are needed to establish the relevant risk factors in recovered patients.
COVID-19 ; Humans ; Pandemics ; Reinfection ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Vaccine Efficacy

BACKGROUND: Data on the immunogenicity and safety of heterologous immunization schedules are inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of homologous and heterologous immunization schedules. METHODS: Multiple databases with relevant studies were searched with an end date of October 31, 2021, and a website including a series of Coronavirus disease 2019 studies was examined for studies before March 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different heterologous and homologous regimens among adults that reported immunogenicity and safety outcomes were reviewed. Primary outcomes included neutralizing antibodies against the original strain and serious adverse events (SAEs). A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: In all, 11 RCTs were included in the systematic review, and nine were ultimately included in the NMA. Among participants who received two doses of CoronaVac, another dose of mRNA or a non-replicating viral vector vaccine resulted in a significantly higher level of neutralizing antibody than a third CoronaVac 600 sino unit (SU); a dose of BNT162b2 induced the highest geometric mean ratio (GMR) of 15.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.53-24.39. Following one dose of BNT162b2 vaccination, a dose of mRNA-1273 generated a significantly higher level of neutralizing antibody than BNT162b2 alone (GMR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.06-1.64), NVX-CoV2373 (GMR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.16-2.21), or ChAdOx1 (GMR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.25-2.59). Following one dose of ChAdOx1, a dose of mRNA-1273 was also more effective for improving antibody levels than ChAdOx1 (GMR = 11.09; 95% CI: 8.36-14.71) or NVX-CoV2373 (GMR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.08-3.91). No significant difference in the risk for SAEs was found in any comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to vaccination with two doses of CoronaVac, a dose of BNT162b2 as a booster substantially enhances immunogenicity reactions and has a relatively acceptable risk for SAEs relative to other vaccines. For primary vaccination, schedules including mRNA vaccines induce a greater immune response. However, the comparatively higher risk for local and systemic adverse events introduced by mRNA vaccines should be noted. REGISTRATION PROSPERO; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; No. CRD42021278149.
Adult ; Humans ; BNT162 Vaccine ; 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Immunization Schedule ; COVID-19/prevention & control* ; COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects* ; Viral Vaccines ; mRNA Vaccines ; Antibodies, Neutralizing ; Antibodies, Viral