Objective To compare two different dumping cooking methods (boiling vs.frying) in their effect on postprandial glucose level in diabetic patients using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM).Methods 10 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in-patients in the Department of Endocrinology of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between February and May 2011 were enrolled,whose fasting and preprandial glucose levels were controlled with a insulin pump.On day 2 and day 4 in the study period,the patients were given fried dumplings and boiled dumplings for lunch respectively,with the same nutrient contents.The starch digestibility of these two kinds of dumplings were compared using in vitro resistant starch digestion,measuring the concentrations of rapidly digestible starch,slowly digestible starch,and resistant starch.CGM was used to record blood glucose changes,in order to evaluate glycemic effect of these two dumpling cooking methods on postprandial glucose levels at 9 time points (0,15,30,60,90,120,150,180,and 240 minutes),peak blood glucose,and area under the curve (AUC) in 4 time periods (0-60,63-120,123-180,and 183-240 minutes).Results The percentage of rapidly digestible starch was remarkably lower in fried dumplings than in boiled dumplings (30.8％ vs.77.0％),but the content of slowly digestible starch in fried dumplings was higher than that in boiled ones (63.7％ vs.20.7％),and the content of resistant starch in both dumplings were similarly low (1.9％ and 2.3％).The average time to the peak glucose value was shorter in fried dumplings compared with boiled dumplings [(93 ± 53) minutes vs.(156 ± 61) minutes,P =0.02],but the average glucose levels at all the 9 time points and the AUC in all the 4 time periods were not significantly different (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusions Compared with fried dumplings,boiled dumplings show faster starch digestion,but long time to the peak postprandial glucose level.Fried dumplings may raise the glucose level faster than boiled dumplings do in T2DM patients.

Objective To explore the comparative application of phase and diaphragmatic navigation in three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(3D-MRCP)thin-layer scanning in elderly patients.Methods A total of 180 elderly patients were scanned by phase and diaphragmatic navigation via Siemens Aera1.5T superconducting MR scanner.The acquired images were reconstructed by 3D reconstruction.The anatomical structure,image quality and disease diagnosis were compared between the phase and diaphragmatic navigation groups.Results In liver of anatomy,the liver of primary bile duct,the superior,middle and inferior extrahepatic bile duct and the gallbladder could be well displayed,and the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups(P＞0.05).The display of pancreatic duct and the liver of secondary bile duct of diaphragmatic navigation was significantly better than those of phase navigation(P＜0.05).In terms of image quality,the excellent rate of diaphragmatic navigation was significantly higher than that of phase navigation,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rate of pancreatobiliary system diseases,the diagnostic rate of cholelithiasis,common bile duct stones,common bile duct dilatation and pancreatic duct dilatation between the two groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion Diaphragmatic navigation is signifi-cantly better than phase navigation in the display of the anatomical structure of the pancreatic duct,the liver of secondary bile duct,and the excellent rate of image quality.Diaphragmatic navigation is more suitable for thin-layer 3D-MRCP scanning in elderly patients.

Objective To explore the difference of gut microbiota between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and non-diabetic population in Beijing. Methods 83 T2DM patients were selected as T2DM group and 64 non-diabetic subjects were selected as control group. Fecal samples were collected from all the subjects. The intestinal flora was detected by metagenome sequencing technology. Results 11 bacterialphyla were detec-ted in the two groups, there were significant differences in species diversity of Actinobacteria (P=0. 013), Firmicutes (P=0. 005), Fusobacteria (P=0. 001), Proteobacteria (P<0. 001) between the two groups. Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria were all enriched in the T2DM group, Firmicutes were enriched in the control group. 152 bacterial genera were detected in the two groups with 31 bacterial genera ofsignificant differences. In T2DM group, the levels of Roseburia, Eubacterium and Faecalibacterium decreased, while the levels of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Escherichia increased. Conclusion There are significant differ-ences in the composition of gut microbiota between T2DM patients and non-diabetic population. Regulation of gut microbiota in T2DM patients may be helpful to improve the condition of T2DM.