OBJECTIVE To investigate and analyze the bacteria on the nurse mask in ICU ward and its air effects disinfection.METHODS Sixty masks were examined for the bacteria numbers,germiculture and drug resistance.The bacteria numbers on the mask were recorded in 2,4,6 and 8 h with or without air disinfection,and the numbers of air bacteria were also estimated before and after air disinfection 2,4,6 and 8 h.The kinds and drug resistance of bacteria in the sputum of patients were recorded during the examining time.RESULTS The meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus(MRS,90.6%) and the Escherichia coli(ECO,9.4%) were the major bacteria on the mask.The numbers of bacteria on the mask at 2,4,6 and 8 h with air disinfection were 1.2?1.5,3.4 ?2.8,4.2?3.4 and 5.3?3.6 CFU/cm2,respectively.The numbers of bacteria on the air before air disinfection were 1264?314 CFU/m3 and after air disinfection 2,4,6 and 8 h were 917?213,790?176,676?179 and 483?167 CFU/m3,respectively.The numbers of bacteria on the mask and on the ward air were decreased obviously after the air disinfection comparing without disinfection.MRS was found in 26.7% patients sputum,and had the same drug-resistance spectrum as the bacteria on the mask.CONCLUSIONS MRS and ECO may be infected through air,and the effective air disinfection could reduce the numbers of bacteria on the air,and decrease the possibility of intercross infection.

Objective To observe the clinical effect of remazolam combined with remifentanil on elderly patients undergoing painless fiberscopy,and to analyze its effect on the depth of sedation and hemodynamics.Methods Eighty-six elderly patients who underwent painless fiberscopy in Jiangxi Provincial Chest Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were selected as study subjects and divided into group A and group B according to the randomized lottery method.After enrollment,both groups of patients were opened to intravenous nasal catheter for oxygen administration,and 2% lidocaine was given to the patients,so that the patients held their breath for choking in order to fully diffuse into the trachea to achieve local anesthesia effect,and at the same time,remifentanil was given to the patients in both groups as the basic analgesia.On this basis,group A was injected with remazolam and group B was injected with propofol.The hemodynamic indexes[mean arterial pressure(MAP),pulse oximetry(SpO2)and heart rate(HR)]and Ramsay sedation scores of the two groups were recorded before anesthesia induction(T1),after anesthesia induction(T2),at the time of the passage of the fiberscope through the vocal folds(T3),at the time of the complete insertion of the fiberscope(T4),at the time of completing the examination(T5).And the onset time of sedation was compared between the two groups,awakening time,number of respiratory depression,adverse reactions and incidence,and satisfaction with the sedation effect in the two groups.Results The MAP and HR of group A were significantly lower than those of group B at T3,T4 and T5(P＜0.05).While the SPO2 and Ramsay sedation score were significantly higher than those of group B(P＜0.05).The repeated measures ANOVA and different awakening time measurements were statistically different between groups(P＜0.05).Compared with group B,group A had a significantly shorter sedation onset time and awakening time and fewer respiratory depression,which was statistically significant(P＜0.05).Group A had a statistically significant lower incidence rate of adverse reactions than group B(P＜0.05).Conclusion Remazolam combined with remifentanil in compound surface local anesthesia for painless ciliopathy has more efficient sedation effect,more stable hemodynamics,and lower incidence of adverse reactions for elderly patients,and it is a potential drug that can be a safer and more efficient.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate suspension in the treatment of peptic ulcer.Methods:This present study was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive drug parallel controlled phase Ⅱ clinical trial. According to different indications, the trial was divided into gastric ulcer (GU) and duodenal ulcer (DU) studies. Patients were stratified-block randomly divided with a 1∶1 ratio into experimental group and control group. The patients in the experimental group were administrated with omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate suspension omeprazole (20 mg for DU or 40 mg for GU, and 1 680 mg sodium bicarbonate) once a day. The patients in the control group received omeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablet20 mg for DU or 40 mg for GU once a day. The treatment period was 4 weeks for DU and 8 weeks for GU. The main efficacy indicator was ulcer healing rate under endoscopy. The time of pain disappearance and the total effective rate of clinical symptom relief were used as the secondary efficacy indicators, and the incidence of adverse reactions was used as the safety indicator. The data set included full analysis set (FAS), per-protocol set (PPS) and safety set (SS). Independent sample t test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi square test, Fisher exact test method and non-inferiority test were used for statistical analysis. Results:Two hundred and seventy two DU patients and 237 GU patients were included in the FAS, 247 DU patients and 201 GU patients were included in the PPS, and 272 DU patients and 235 GU patients were included in the SS. The results of FAS analysis showed that after 4 weeks treatment, the healing rate of DU under endoscopy in the experimental group was 91.91% (125/136) and that in the control group was 94.85% (129/136), and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). After 8 weeks treatment the healing rate of GU under endoscopy in the experimental group was 86.44% (102/118) and that in the control group was 87.39% (104/119), and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The results of non-inferiority analysis showed the lower limit of 95% confidence interval of difference in effective rate between the two groups was over -10% (-8.84% for DU and -9.54% for GU), which indicated that the effective rate of experimental group was not inferior to that of the control group. The results of PPS analysis were consistent with the results of FAS. The results of FAS analysis showed the median time of abdominal pain disappearance of DU patients in the experimental group and the control group was both 6 d, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The median time of abdominal pain disappearance of GU patients in the experimental group and the control group was both 8 d, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). After 4 weeks of treatment, the total effective rates of clinical symptom relief of DU of the trial group and the control group were 95.59% (130/136) and 97.79% (133/136), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). After 8 weeks of treatment, the total effective rates of clinical symptom relief of GU of the experimental group and the control group were 95.76% (113/118) and 93.28% (111/119), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The results of SS analysis showed that the incidence of adverse reactions of DU patients in the trial group and the control group was 5.15% (7/136) and 2.21% (3/136), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions of GU patients in the experimental group and the control group was 12.71% (15/118) and 6.84% (8/117), respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Omeprazole and sodium bicarbonate suspension is not inferior to omeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablet in healing efficacy under endoscopy in peptic ulcer, and has a good safety.