Objective To investigate the influence and safety of ultrasound-guided transverses abdominis plane block on general analgesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal operation. Methods Three hundred patients scheduled for lower abdominal operation under general anesthesia were randomly divided into 2 groups:ropivacaine group (group A,n = 151) and normal saline group (group B,n = 149). After the operation ultrasound-guided TAP was performed and 0.375% ropivacaine 20 mL was injected in group A while the equal volume of normal saline was used instead in group B. VAS score, Ramsay sedation score, and Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS) score were recorded at the time points of 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours postoperatively. The adverse reactions such as nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, motor and sensory disorders were also recorded. Results No significant difference in the demographic characteristics such as sex , age , height and weight , was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). VAS score and BCS score were significantly different (P < 0.05) in group A compared with group B. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the two groups in Ramsay score and adverse reactions. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided TAP block can effectively meet the needs of patients with postoperative analgesia and enhance the comfort after the lower abdominal operation.

Objective:To evaluate the relationship between postoperative delirium and preoperative frailty in elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.Methods:Elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery at our hospital from March 2019 to July 2022 were collected and their age, comorbidities, gender, smoking history, type of surgery, preoperative albumin, duration of surgery, duration of anesthesia, postoperative hypotension, educational level, nutritional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification, postoperative admission to ICU or not, intraoperative bleeding and preoperative frailty status were collected. The patients were divided into delirium group and non-delirium group according to whether postoperative delirium occurred. The risk factors for postoperative delirium were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn to analyze the value of risk factors in predicting postoperative delirium.Results:There were 74 cases in delirium group and 321 cases in non-delirium group, and the incidence of postoperative delirium was 18.7%. There were statistically significant differences in terms of age ≥70 yr, education level of junior high school and below, poor nutritional status, ASA Physical Status classification Ⅲ, postoperative admission to ICU, proportion of frailty and intraoperative bleeding volume between delirium group and non-delirium group ( P<0.05). The results of logistic regression analysis showed that age, educational level, nutritional status, ASA Physical Status classification, intraoperative bleeding and frailty were all independent risk factors for delirium ( P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of preoperative frailty predicting postoperative delirium was 0.672 (95% confidence interval 0.605-0.740). Conclusions:Preoperative frailty is an independent risk factor for postoperative delirium in elderly patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, which can predict the occurrence of postoperative delirium to some extent.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of esketamine for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) in elderly patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Methods:Ninety elderly female patients, aged 65-78 yr, weighing 46-75 kg, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ, undergoing elective modified radical surgery for breast cancer under general anesthesia, were divided into 2 groups ( n=45 each) using a random number table method: esketamine PCIA group (group E) and sufentanil PCIA group (group S). Anesthesia was induced with target-controlled infusion of propofol, intravenous atracurium besylate and sufentanil and maintained with target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil and intermittent intravenous boluses of cis-benzenesulfonic acid atracurium.The patients were connected to an analgesic pump for PCIA at 10 min before completion of operation.The PCIA solution in group E contained esketamine 2 mg/kg, ketorolac tromethamine 90 mg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline.The PCIA solution in group S contained sufentanil 1 μg/kg, ketorolac tromethamine 90 mg and tropisetron 5 mg in 100 ml of normal saline.The PCA pump was set up with a 1.5 ml bolus dose, a 15 min lockout interval and background infusion at a rate of 1.5 ml/h, and the analgesia was performed until 48 h after operation.When numeric rating scale score ≥ 4 points and the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia was not good, tramadol 100 mg was intravenously injected for rescue analgesia.Steward recovery scores were recorded at 4, 8, 24 and 48 h after operation.The requirement for rescue analgesia, effective pressing times of analgesic pump and time to first flatus were recorded within 48 h after operation.The nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression, dizziness and pruritus within 48 h after operation and delirium within 7 days after operation were recorded.The 40-item Quality of-Recovery scale was used to evaluate the early postoperative recovery of patients at 24 and 48 h after operation. Results:Compared with group S, the 40-item Quality of Recovery scale score was significantly increased at each time point, postoperative time to first flatus was shortened, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting and pruritus was decreased ( P<0.05), and no significant change was found in the Steward recovery score at each time point after operation, effective pressing times of PCA and requirement for rescue analgesia in group E ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Esketamine provides better efficacy than sufentanil when used for PCIA in elderly patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.

Objective:To evaluate the effect of obesity on the displacement of a left-sided double-lumen tube (DLT) during positional changes.Methods:This was a prospective cohort study. Six hundred and two patients who underwent elective chest surgery and required insertion of a left-sided DLT from February 2020 to November 2023 in our hospital were selected and divided into 2 groups based on the body mass index (BMI): obesity group (BMI≥28 kg/m 2,n=208) and non-obesity group (18.5 kg/m 2≤BMI<28 kg/m 2,n=394). General characteristics of patients, history of chest surgery, DLT model, depth of DLT placement in supine position, height/depth of placement (H/D) ratio, and distance of DLT displacement were recorded. DLT displacement was defined as a displacement distance of ≥15 mm. The logistic regression was used for analysis of the relationship between BMI and left DLT shift during positional changes. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the accuracy of BMI in predicting the left-sided DLT displacement during positional changes. Results:Compared with non-obese group, the depth of DLT placement was significantly reduced, the H/D ratio was increased, the distance of DLT displacement was increased, and the incidence of DLT displacement was increased in obese group ( P<0.05). The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that a BMI≥28 kg/m 2 was an independent risk factor for DLT displacement ( OR value [95% confidence interval]=4.18 (2.36-7.38), P<0.001). The sensitivity of BMI in predicting the left-sided DLT displacement during positional changes was 77.4%, and the specificity was 69.6%, with an optimal cutoff value of 27.48 kg/m 2 and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.757. Conclusions:Obesity can increase the probability of the left-sided DLT displacement during positional changes.

Objective:To compare the effects of left paratracheal pressure (LPP) and cricoid pressure (CP) during mask ventilation in obese patients.Methods:Sixty patients of either sex, aged 18-60 yr, with 28 kg/m 2≤body mass index<35 kg/m 2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for general anesthesia, were divided into 2 groups ( n=30 each) using a random number table method: LPP group and CP group. In LPP group, pressure was applied beside the trachea, above the clavicle towards the vertebral direction, while in CP group, pressure was applied downwards to the cricoid cartilage, with a force of pressure between 25-35 N. The spatial relationship between the esophagus, trachea, and cricoid cartilage, the presence of air shadows in the gastric antrum during mask ventilation, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric antrum before and after mask ventilation as well as the airway pressure during mask ventilation were observed. Results:In both groups, the esophagus was located in the left of the trachea in the supraclavicular region. There were no statistically significant differences in the airway pressure during mask ventilation and the CSA of the gastric antrum prior to mask ventilation between the two groups ( P>0.05). Compared to LPP group, the proportion of patients with air shadows in the gastric antrum during mask ventilation was significantly increased, and the CSA of the gastric antrum was increased after mask ventilation in CP group ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared to CP, LPP can decrease the development of air entering the stomach during mask ventilation and reduce the CSA of the gastric antrum after mask ventilation in obese patients.