1.Comparison of cognitive function in patients with treatment-resistant depression and drug-naive first-episode major depressive disorder
Chaodun ZHENG ; Yingmei CHEN ; Jiuwei TAN ; Guoxiong LIU ; Yinglian CAI ; Xiaofeng LAN ; Yanling ZHOU
Sichuan Mental Health 2021;34(5):429-434
ObjectiveTo explore the differences of cognitive function in patients with treatment-resistant depression and drug-naive first-episode major depressive disorder, and to examine the relationship between severity of clinical symptoms and cognitive function, so as to provide references for prognosis improvement. MethodsFrom November 2016 to December 2019, 119 patients with drug-naive first-episode major depressive disorder and 82 patients with treatment-resistant depression in a hospital in Guangzhou were enrolled, meantime, another 71 healthy individuals recruited from the community were set as healthy control group. Clinical symptoms were assessed using Hamilton Depression Scale-17 item (HAMD-17) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA). Cognitive domains, including speed of processing, working memory, verbal learning and memory, and visual learning and memory were measured with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Multiple covariance analysis was used to compare the differences in cognitive function among three groups. Thereafter, partial correlation analysis was performed within patient groups to explore the relationship of HAMD-17/HAMA score with the four dimensions of MCCB. ResultsThe speed of processing, visual learning and memory scores of treatment-resistant depression group and drug-naive first-episode depression group were lower than those of healthy control group, and the working memory score of the treatment-resistant depression group was lower than that of the healthy control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05 or 0.01). The speed of processing, visual learning and memory scores of treatment-resistant depression group were significantly lower than those of drug-naive first-episode depression group (P<0.05 or 0.01). Partial correlation analysis within patient groups found that HAMD-17/HAMA total score had no correlation with the four dimensions of MCCB (P>0.05). ConclusionCompared with drug-naive first-episode major depressive disorder patients and healthy controls, the impairments of speed of processing, visual learning and memory are more severe in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Moreover, the cognitive function impairment in patients with drug-naive first-episode major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression has no correlation with the severity of depressive and anxious symptoms.
2.Correlation between anhedonia level and cognitive function in patients with first-episode psychosis
Yingmei CHEN ; Minmin CHEN ; Yinglian CAI ; Yanling ZHOU ; Qiuxia WU ; Siqian ZHONG ; Bin ZHANG ; Liping CAO
Sichuan Mental Health 2021;34(3):226-230
ObjectiveTo explore the anhedonia level and its relationship with cognitive function in patients with first-episode psychosis, and to analyze the influencing factors of cognitive function. MethodsA total of 143 first-episode psychiatric patients who met the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) in the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from December 2016 to March 2019 were selected. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to evaluate the patient’s psychiatric symptoms, in which N2 (emotional withdrawal) and N4 (passive/apathetic social withdrawal) were used to assess the anhedonia level, and patients whose (N2+N4) scores beyond 4 were classified into anhedonia group, and those with (N2+N4) scores less than or equal to 4 were classified into non-anhedonia group. Hamilton Depression Scale-24 item (HAMD-24) was used to measure the depressive symptoms, and the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was used to detect cognitive function. Then the clinical symptoms and cognitive function of two groups were compared, and the influencing factors of cognitive function were screened by multiple linear regression analysis. ResultsThe negative symptom score, general pathological symptom score and total score of PANSS in anhedonia group were significantly higher than those of non-anhedonia group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). The score of working memory in adolescent subgroup, the scores of information processing speed, attention/alertness and vocabulary learning in adult subgroup of anhedonia group were lower than those of non-anhedonia group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the anhedonia score and the duration of untreated psychosis were the influencing factors of working memory in adolescent subgroup (P<0.05). ConclusionPatients with high levels of anhedonia suffer more severe mental symptoms and cognitive impairment, moreover, anhedonia is one of the influencing factors of working memory in adolescents.