Objective To analyze the timeliness of the start time of the first elective operation in a hospital and observe its impact on the operating room cost.Methods Make statistics and analysis on the opening of the first operation in a hospital,record the on-time opening rate of the first operation,analyze the reasons for the delay in the opening time of the first operation,formulate corresponding intervention measures and set up a"management team to improve the efficiency of operating room use".The on-time rate of the first operation,operation,cost control and the satisfaction of surgeons and patients were compared before and after the operation.Results The overall punctuality rate of the first operation was 53.74％,among which the colorectal sur-gery department had the highest punctuality rate of 63.16％,while the minimally invasive surgery department had the lowest punctuality rate of 45.45％.The main reasons for the delay of first operation(35.29％),failed anesthesia(30.88％),and the termination of the operation(17.65％);compared with before implementation,higher overtime time of nurses,shorter opening time and expected time,decreased interval between operation(P＜0.05),lower frequency of centralized delivery and unnecessa-ry consumables cost within 1 month after implementation(P＜0.05),and higher satisfaction of patients and physicians after im-plementation(P＜0.05).Conclusion By improving the first elective operation on time,can effectively reduce the cost of the operating room,shorten the nurse overtime time,at the same time improve the satisfaction of doctors and patients,and improve the management efficiency of the operating room,the first operation on time improved,interval time and unnecessary consumables costs are significantly reduced,optimize the use efficiency of the operating room resources.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of online and offline myopia prevention and control health education interventions using wearable behavior monitoring tools for non myopic elementary school students,so as to provide evidence based medical support for public health practices. Methods: From May to June in 2021, two schools were selected within the same county in Jiangsu Province. School 1 conducted online and offline parental health education ( n =111), while school 2 exclusively conducted offline health education activities, representing the traditional intervention group ( n =122). Students from both schools underwent monitoring through wearable behavior tracking tools, with feedback reports provided (eye distance, eye duration, ambient light, and outdoor exposure time). Both schools relied on activities to carry out health education interventions, and organized the distribution of promotional materials and display boards. The intervention group also established WeChat groups to conduct online "Healthy Parents Action" (answering and providing feedback on health knowledge related to myopia prevention and control, myopia prevention and control, science popularization, etc. raised by parents). Evaluation criteria included myopia rates, post dilation refractive error, and axial length, with a tracking period of two years (from 2021 to 2023). Additionally, the study collected refractive parameters from non myopic students who did not participate in wearable tool monitoring in the 12 classes across the two schools. Results: The baseline results indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of refractive parameters and wearable tool monitoring results (including screen time, viewing distance, outdoor exposure time, and homework light exposure)( t/Z/χ 2=1.94,1.17,0.58,0.40,0.80,0.69,0.32, P >0.05). After a two-year follow up, in the first and second year, the myopia rate of the online Healthy Parents Action group (11.4%, 29.7%) were lower than that of the traditional group (26.2%, 50.9%), and the degree of refractive change in the intervention group [0.63(0.38,1.19)D] was lower than that of the traditional group [0.91(0.40,1.50)D], and all the differences were statistically significant( χ 2/ Z =4.93，10.37，2.29， P <0.05). However, there were no significant differences ( P >0.05) in axial length changes between the two groups over the twoyear intervention period. Nevertheless, in the second year, the axial length change in the traditional group [0.35(0.20,0.65)mm] was lower than that in the natural observation group [0.55(0.30,0.75)mm], and this difference was statistically significant ( Z =1.92, P <0.05). Conclusions Online and offline myopia prevention and control health education can effectively reduce myopia rates. The intervention mode combining wearable behavior monitoring tools with online health education may have better effects, but further large sample and multi center studies are needed to provide additional evidence and confirmation.

Objective To evaluate the applicability of the Chinese version of SF-36 ( v. 2 ) scale for evaluating the quality of life of hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure. Methods From September 2013 to December 2014, 159 patients with chronic heart failure(NYHA I-IV), who were older than 18 years, clear mind and well self-expressed, were selected as participants. Questionnaire surveys included general survey and SF-36(v. 2) scale. Internal consistency reliability, binary reliability and construct validity were all analyzed as indicators to evaluate SF-36 ( v. 2 ) scale. Results A total of 159 questionnaires were issued and 159 valid questionnaires were recovered. The eight dimensions of SF-36(v. 2) scale including physical function (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), social function (SF), vitality (VT), role-emotion(RE), and mental health (MH) score conversion were (41.57 ±24.86), (48.35 ±21.64), (69.18 ± 25. 68), (31. 28 ± 16. 01), (48. 90 ± 19. 53), (45. 05 ± 22. 76), (59. 43 ± 24. 31), (57. 55 ± 19. 03); the floor effects were 2. 5%, 4. 4%, 3. 1%, 4. 4%, 3. 1%, 6. 3%, 0. 6%, 1. 3%; the ceiling effects were 0. 0%, 3. 8%, 21. 4%, 0. 0%, 0. 0%, 1. 9%, 3. 1%, 0. 0%. The item-convergent validity all achieved the standard (r≥0. 4), and the total scaling success rate of item-convergent was 100. 00%; the dimensions′success rates of item-discriminant validity of RP, BP, RE and SF were all 100%, the rest of four dimensions were PF 95. 71%, GH 85. 71%, VT 89. 29%, MH 94. 29%, and the total success rate was 94. 69%. Internal consistency reliability ranged from 0. 738 to 0. 919; the binary reliability ranged from 0. 808 to 0. 963. Within factors analysis, two common factors were confirmed, separately representing physical health and mental health, altogether making contribution of 61. 66% cumulative variance. Conclusions As the revision of SF-36(v. 1), SF-36(v. 2) scale seemed more friendly in layout for questions and answers, the floor and ceiling effects significantly reduced. Additionally, it also shows good reliability and validity in the evaluation of quality of life of hospitalized patients with chronic heart failure, and the SF-36(v. 2) scale can be used to evaluate the quality of life ( QOL) of patients with chronic heart failure.