Eighty -eight cases of sugar induced diarrhea in children were treated by TCM on the basis of differentiation of syndrome manifestation. Two types were differentiated, namely spleen jeopardized by damp - heat evils, deficient spleen immersed in dampness. Results showed that the cured rate was 62. 5%, with a total effective rate of 92. 1%.

Objective: To study the protective effects and the mechanism of Salvia yunnanensis extract on hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in cultured rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes.Methods: The hypoxia/reoxygen (H/R) injury model was established in H9c2 cell strain with or without the extract of Salvia yunnanensis.The cultured H9c2 cardiomyocytes were randomly divided into 6 groups: the normal control (C) group, H/R group, H/R+verapamil (H/R+V) group, H/R+Salvia yunnanensis extract at low dose (H/R+L, 0.01 mg·L-1) group, medium dose (H/R+M, 0.1 mg·L-1) group and high dose (H/R+H, 1.0 mg·L-1) group.The cell viability was measured by MTT assay and the activity of malondialdehyde (MDA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured by a detection kit.Fluorescence absorbance (A) value was measured by a fluoroscopy to show the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels.Results: Compared with that in the model group, the survival rate of myocardial cells was significantly higher in Salvia yunnanensis extract at low, medium and high dose groups (P＜0.05 or P＜0.01), and the intracellular LDH leakage (P＜0.05 or P＜0.01), the content of MDA in cytoplasm (P＜0.01) and the intracellular ROS levels significantly decreased in Salvia yunnanensis extract at high dose group (P＜0.05).Conclusion: The extract of Salvia yunnanensis has protective effect on hypoxia/reoxygenation injury in cultured rat H9c2 cardiomyocytes, and the mechanism may be related to the reduction of lipid peroxides and removal of cell oxygen free radicals.

Objective Knowledge?based radiotherapy ( KBRT ) can reduce the plan quality variability induced by different experiences between physicians and improve the quality of treatment plans. Methods The Varian Rapid Plan system was used to train a dose?volume histogram ( DVH) prediction model. The obtained model was preliminarily applied to semi?automatic design of the preoperative treatment plans for rectal cancer. Eighty high?quality volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were imported into the model training set of the Rapid Plan system. The structures of the plans were matched to the corresponding labels and codes as listed in the library. The training started after the verification of prescription. The residual plots,regression curves,geometric plots for organ at risk ( OAR) ,in?field DVH plots,and model training logs were examined. After removal of the mismatch, the original plans were assessed to rule out outliers and influential data points. More similar plans may be added for another round of training. Ten KBRT plans were designed using the final model and compared with the clinical plans. Results For the two major OARs,the femoral head and bladder,the average goodness of fit of the principal component were 0?999 415/1.0 and 0?999 963/1.0 for the DVH model,and 0?999 651/1.0 and 0?999 945/1.0 for geometry?based expected dose model,respectively. In all the plans, 11 had Cook ’ s distance values exceeding the tolerance and 4 had studentized residual values exceeding the tolerance. The outliers were all kept in the training set to generalize the scope of the model. The 10 KBRT plans had significantly improved homogeneity indices for PGTV and PTV than the original plans (P=0?00,0?04).The 10 KBRT plans also had significantly reduced D50% to the femoral head and bladder as well as significantly reduced mean doses to the bladder than the original plans (P=0?042,0?000,0?005). Conclusions In this study,the Rapid Plan system is used to train a KBRT model for design of preoperative radiotherapy plans for rectal cancer. The results of preliminary application meet the clinical requirements.

Objective To investigate the dose distribution and radiation risk of Varian thoracic cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with default parameters with reference to Monte Carlo simulation and International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) report 110.Methods EGSnrc/BEAMnrc code was used to simulate the material, thickness, and geometry of the kV CBCT source (kVS) to establish the kVS model.A benchmarked MCSIM code was applied to calculate the dose distribution in the ICRP phantom after the scan with the standard thoracic parameters (110 kV, 20 mA, and 262 mAs), and the conversion coefficient of absolute dose was obtained in a spherical phantom following the TG-61 protocol.The results of Monte Carlo simulation were validated by PDD and Profile in a water phantom and the measurement of the absolute dose in the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) phantom and Alderson phantom.The models including BEIR VⅡ were used to evaluate the radiation risks.Results With reference to the criterion of 3%/1 mm, the uncertainties of PDD and Profile were less than 2%.The difference between the measured and calculated values was<2.9% in the CTDI phantom and ≤0.05 cGy in the Alderson phantom.In the ICRP110 phantom, the doses to the left lung, right lung, left breast, right breast, heart, thyroid, trachea, cancellous bone, and cortical bone were 1.28, 1.39, 1.74, 1.80, 1.46, 0.48, 0.88, 0.85, and 1.84 cGy, respectively.The relative risks of ischemic heart disease, breast cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and tracheal cancer in a standard scan were1.001 , 1.009, 1.019, 1.000, and 1.008, respectively. Conclusions The accumulated dose and long-term risks of CBCT during image-guided thoracic radiotherapy cannot be neglected and should be effectively controlled.

Objective To compare the performances of four commercially available LINAC daily QA instruments.Methods The dosimetric stability of a LINAC including central axis output,flatness and symmetry were verified and fine-tuned using a 3-dimensional water phantom,dosimeters and ionization chambers.The baseline of the four instruments including LINA-C,QUICK-C,BEAM-C and QA3 were set thereafter.Daily measurements of LINAC were conducted with these instruments respectively and the results were compared.Arbitrary errors (CAX and SYM) beyond TG-142 tolerances were introduced to the LINAC to test the sensibilities of each instrument in detecting these changes.Results Relative to the baseline that were measured by the 3-dimensional water phantom and dosimeters,the results monitored by the four instruments were comparable.The maximum disparities of the CAX,FLAT,and SYM were 0.5％ (LINA-C),-0.45％ (QUICK-C),and 0.5％ (BEAM-C),respectively.All checkers detected the known errors successfully.Conclusions The stabilities of all the four evaluated instruments met the requirements of daily QA for LINAC.LINA-C verifies CAX only.QUICKE-C,BEAM-C and QA3 can be used to perform all the daily QA protocols as suggested by AAPM TG 142 report.They also provide unique additional functions.The setup of baseline determines if the morning checkers could measure the LINAC dosimetric parameters correctly.When an error is alarmed by the morning checker,it is recommended to verify the performance of the instrument first rather than recalibrating the LINAC immediately.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility and dosimetric features of a volume modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-configured model in knowledge-based optimization of fixed-field dynamic intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on the Varian RapidPlan system.Methods ① A dose-volume histogram prediction model was trained with 81 qualified preoperative VMAT plans for rectal cancer and then statistically verified.② For clinically approved 10 IMRT plans with the same dose prescription,the above model was used to automatically generate new optimization parameters and dynamic muhileaf collimator (MLC) sequences with field geometry and beam energy unchanged.③ In order to rule out the disparities between different versions,a single algorithm was used to calculate the absolute doses of the original and new plans.④ Statistical analyses were performed on dosimetric parameters after comparable target dose coverage was achieved in the two plans by appropriate normalization.Results On the basis of similar target dose homogeneity and coverage,RapidPlan significantly reduced the doses to the urinary bladder (D50％ by 9.01 Gy,P =0.000;Dmean by 8.08 Gy,P =0.005) and the femoral head (D50％ by 4.20 Gy,P =0.000;Dmean by 3.84 Gy,P=0.005) but significantly elevated the mean total number of monitor units (1211±99 vs.771±79,P=0.000) and the number of fields with multiple MLC carriage groups.The knowledge-based semi-automated optimization caused a significantly larger number of high-dose hotspots but a similar D2％ (52.54 vs.52.71 Gy,P=0.239).Conclusions The VMAT model can be used for the knowledge-based semi-automated optimization of IMRT plans to enhance the efficiency and OAR protection.However,the resulting high-dose hotspots need further manual intervention.

Objective To explore the Monte Carlo calculation methods for the absolute dose calibration and output factor of 6 MV flattening-filter ( FF) and flattening-filter free ( FFF) photon beams based on TrueBeam accelerator .Methods The BEAMnrc code was used to model the LINAC head of FF and FFF modes.The BEAM_up covers the components from the target to the monitor chamber , and BEAM_down includes the structures beneath the chamber , the dose deposit to the monitor chamber contributed by the incidence electrons and scattered particles from the secondary collimators were calculated respectively .The incidence electron-induced dose at certain depths on the central axis were simulated by means of the DOSXYZnrc code .By means of dose calibration equation , the calibration factor for the standard field (10 cm ×10 cm) and the output factors for various fields (1 cm ×1 cm-40 cm ×40 cm) were computed respectively .Results For the 6 MV FF and FFF beams under the standard 10 cm ×10 cm field, 1 MU equals to 7.747 ×1013 ±3.099 ×1011 and 3.248 ×1013 ±1.624 ×1011 electrons to the target , respectively , which deposited 21.53 and 35.01 cGy to the monitor chamber of the virtual accelerator respectively .The difference between the simulated and calculated output factors were 0.72%±1.4%and 0.56%±0.78%for FF and FFF , respectively .Conclusions The model generated and measured output factors agree well , indicating the good accuracy of the dose calculation by the model , which would provides basis for further clinical dosimetric studies .

Objective To compare the impact of immobilization base plates composed of 7 types of materials on the MR-simulation imaging quality used for radiotherapy,aiming to provide reference data for clinical applications.Methods Using identical T1 and T2 sequences of Siemens MR-simulator,the MR images of ACR Large Phantom were acquired on the Orfit carbon fiber laminate,polycarbonate (PC),high precision base plate (HP),Jinan Huayuxin BR,WR,KP and SP materials,respectively.The imaging quality without any plate was used as the baseline data.The following metrics were compared:1.High-contrast spatial resolution:the sharpness of 3 pairs of hole arrays was observed,which represented resolutions of 1.1 mm,1.0 mm and 0.9 mm on the LR and AP directions;2.Image intensity uniformity in terms of percent integral uniformity (PIU):PIU =100× [1-((high-low)/(high +low)];3.Low-contrast resolution:distinguishable spokes representing resolutions of 5.1％,3.6％,2.5％ and 1.4％ were recorded.According to ACR recommendations,high-contrast resolution of 1.0 mm,PIU of T1WI and T2＞82％and low-contrast spoke difference＜3 were considered as clinically acceptable.Results High-contrast T1WI and T2WI resolutions of no plate,PC plate,HP plate and KP material were all 0.9 mm,and those of the remaining materials were =worse than 0.9 mm.The T1WI and T2WI PIU of no plate was＞87％,and the PIU of carbon fiber plate was reduced by＞ 25％.The PIU decrease of remaining materials was within ±4％.Except the carbon fiber plate,the low-contrast spokes of the remaining materials were within ±3 compared with the reference.Conclusions In clinical settings,carbon fiber plate exerts the most significant effect upon the MR-simulation imaging quality,which is unsuitable for MR simulation.Imaging quality of PC and HP plates are consistent with that of no plate.BR and KP materials exert slight effect upon MR signal.The remaining materials are of potential values for the manufacture of immobilization devices and accessories.

Objective To compare two pretreatment plan QA methods for HalcyonTM accelerator using Portal Dosimetry (PD),and PTW OCTAVIUS 1500 detector array + Octagonal phantom (Oct 1500)respectively.Methods Parallel measurement-based pretreatment QA using two methods was performed for 22 IMRT/VMAT plans (74 fields) that have been used to treat 20 patients recruited in the Halcyon clinical trial.Several γ 2D comparisons were also applied to provide guidelines for Halcyon planning QA.Results Using Oct1500 method,the γ 2D passing rates for 74 fields in 22 Plans were 95.26±3.59,95.01±3.62 (Local Dose),99.05± 1.35,98.57± 1.96 (Max Dose) respectively.Two-related samples non-parametric tests suggested that the differences between the evaluation criteria were of statistical significance (Z =-7.220,-4.108,P＜0.05).For PD method,the γ 2D passing rates were 84.11％ ± 1.35％ (1 mm/1％),99.07％± 1.35％ (2 mm/2％),and 99.86％ ± 1.35％ (3 mm/3％).Two-related samples non-parametric tests suggested that the differences between evaluation criteria of PD method were statistically significant (Z =-7.475,-7.475,-6.906,P＜0.05).For 74 fields and max dose,3 mm/3％ evaluation criteria,two-related samples non-parametric tests suggested that the differences between PD and Oct1500 method were statistically significant (Z=-5.072,P＜0.05).Conclusions Both methods can be used for Halcyon pretreatment plan QA.PD is superior to Oct1500 with respect to efficiency and spatial resolution-induced verification accuracy.The criteria of 2 mm/2％ for PD,and Max Dose/3 mm/3％ for Oct1500 was suggested.

Powered by big data and artificial intelligence, the research and clinical application of treatment planning automation for radiation therapy are rapidly growing. The application and supervision of planning automation systems necessitate careful consideration of different levels of automation, as well as the context for use. For autonomous vehicles, the levels of automation have been defined at home and abroad. Nevertheless, no such definitions exist for radiotherapy planning automation. To promote and standardize the development of radiotherapy planning automation and initiate discussion within the community, we developed this recommendation with reference to the taxonomy of driving automation for vehicles and divided the radiotherapy planning automation into six levels (level 1 to 6).