1.Clinical outcome of cuff-reserved calcium deposit removing on extensive shoulder calcific tendonitis
Yeteng HE ; Xinfeng YAN ; Ming ZHANG
Orthopedic Journal of China 2006;0(17):-
[Objective]To observe the clinical outcome of rotator cuff-reserved calcium deposit removal on extensive shoulder calcific tendinitis.To discuss if it is necessary to sacrifce the cuff integrity for a completely removal of calcium deposit.[Method]From Oct.2004 to Apr.2006,15 cases(15 shoulders)of extansive shoulder rotator cuff calcific tendinitis were treated with calcium removal under arthroseopy.Among them there were 6 males and 9 females with an average age of 44.7.The average pre-operative evaluation grade with Constant-Murley were 56(49~62).During the operation,the rotator cuff integrity were reserved in 8 cases and most of the deposits were removed with some calcium left in the reserved cuff layer.In the other 7 cases,complete deposit clearance were performed and the rotator cuff was repaired subsequently,average follow-up were 16.7 months(3~25).The Constant-Murley score and X-ray were taken after operation to evaluate shoulder function and the changes of remnant calcium were observed.[Result]13 cases reported significant pain dissolved and 2 reported pain relieved.The average postoperative Constant-Murley score of cuff-reserved group was 91(81~95),while the cuff-repaired group was 90.3(80~94).On postoperative radiograph,only 3 cases demonstrated remnant deposit,and disappeared within 3 months after operation.[Conclusion]Both of the two kinds of operations showed good clinical outcome.The rotator cuff-reserved calcium deposit removal has simplified operation techniques,less costs and fewer complications.It is unnecessary to sacrifice cuffintegrity for complete calcium removal.The remnant deposit could be absorbed when it is opened after operation.
2.A comparative study of tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous and allogenic tendons
Zhengwu BAI ; Ming ZHANG ; Yeteng HE ; Xinfeng YAN
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2012;28(9):809-812
Objective To investigate the changes of bone tunnel and differences of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendons from autografts and allografts. Methods The study involved in 61 patients with ACL injury undergone arthroscopic ACL reconstruction from June 2008 to November 2009.According to ACL graft differences,61 patients were assigned to two groups,ie,Group A ( reconstruction with tendon allografts,n =27 ) and Group B ( reconstruction with tendon autografts,n =34).MRI examination was performed one week and 6-12 months post-operatively to measure the sagittal bone tunnel diameters at the aperture location,at the location of 1cm away from the aperture and at the widest location of tunnel.Taking the bone tunnel diameter at each location one week post-operatively as the measurement criteria,the differences of bone tunnel diameters at each corresponding location were analyzed statistically.Lysholm score was used to evaluate the clinical effects in the two groups. Results Group A and B were followed up for average 8.4 months and 8.5 months,respectively.Pre-operative clinical data of the two groups had no significant difference.MRI follow-up showed that the tunnel diameters at femoral side and tibial side both had different degree of enlargement.Meanwhile,the enlargement degree at the tibial side was larger than that at the femoral side,with no statistical differences of the two groups regarding tunnel enlargement of the three measurement locations at femoral and tibial sides.Joint stability in all patients was good.The two groups showed no significant difference in Lysholm score after operation ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusions Graft difference is a factor for bone tunnel enlargement after ACL surgery.Autologous and allogenic tendons show no difference in their role in bone tunnel enlargement after ACL surgery or correlation with clinical effects.