Potassium imbalances can be life-threatening and must be identified and corrected prior to surgery. Patients with hypokalemic periodic paralysis (hypoKPP) experience recurrent muscle weakness or paralysis due to hypokalemia. We present the management of a rare case of hypoKPP during surgery and discuss the general complications and perioperative management of the condition. A 70-year-old man with hypoKPP visited the emergency room with abdominal pain requiring a cholecystectomy. He had not experienced hypoKPP since 1993, 1 year after diagnosis. Preoperative examinations were normal, with a serum potassium level of 4.5 mEq/L. Surgery and recovery were uneventful, with potassium levels ≥ 3.3 mEq/L. The post-surgery serum potassium level was 4.3 mEq/L. The patient had no signs of hypokalemia until 1-week post-surgery. Thorough preoperative preparation, careful assessment of serum potassium levels, avoidance of triggering factors, and appropriate postoperative pain relief can help prevent a hypokalemic attack in patients with hypoKPP.

Potassium imbalances can be life-threatening and must be identified and corrected prior to surgery. Patients with hypokalemic periodic paralysis (hypoKPP) experience recurrent muscle weakness or paralysis due to hypokalemia. We present the management of a rare case of hypoKPP during surgery and discuss the general complications and perioperative management of the condition. A 70-year-old man with hypoKPP visited the emergency room with abdominal pain requiring a cholecystectomy. He had not experienced hypoKPP since 1993, 1 year after diagnosis. Preoperative examinations were normal, with a serum potassium level of 4.5 mEq/L. Surgery and recovery were uneventful, with potassium levels ≥ 3.3 mEq/L. The post-surgery serum potassium level was 4.3 mEq/L. The patient had no signs of hypokalemia until 1-week post-surgery. Thorough preoperative preparation, careful assessment of serum potassium levels, avoidance of triggering factors, and appropriate postoperative pain relief can help prevent a hypokalemic attack in patients with hypoKPP.

Background: Epinephrine (EPI) or norepinephrine (NOR) is widely used to treat cardiovascular collapse during lipid emulsion (LE) resuscitation for drug toxicity. However, the effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an LE (Intralipid) on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI and NOR in isolated rat aorta. Methods: The effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated rat aorta was examined. Additionally, the effect of LE on the calcium increase caused by EPI or NOR was investigated. The distribution constant (KD: lipid to aqueous phase) of EPI or NOR between a LE (1%) and an aqueous phase was determined. Results: LE (1 and 2%) did not significantly alter vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated endothelium-intact aorta. Moreover, the LE did not significantly alter the increased calcium level caused by EPI or NOR. The log KD of EPI in the LE (1%) was −0.71, −0.99, and −1.00 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. The log KD of NOR in the LE (1%) was −1.22, −1.25, and −0.96 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. Conclusions Taken together, the Intralipid emulsion did not alter vasoconstriction induced by EPI or NOR that seems to be due to the hydrophilicity of EPI or NOR, leading to sustained hemodynamic support produced by EPI or NOR used during LE resuscitation.

Background: Epinephrine (EPI) or norepinephrine (NOR) is widely used to treat cardiovascular collapse during lipid emulsion (LE) resuscitation for drug toxicity. However, the effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an LE (Intralipid) on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI and NOR in isolated rat aorta. Methods: The effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated rat aorta was examined. Additionally, the effect of LE on the calcium increase caused by EPI or NOR was investigated. The distribution constant (KD: lipid to aqueous phase) of EPI or NOR between a LE (1%) and an aqueous phase was determined. Results: LE (1 and 2%) did not significantly alter vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated endothelium-intact aorta. Moreover, the LE did not significantly alter the increased calcium level caused by EPI or NOR. The log KD of EPI in the LE (1%) was −0.71, −0.99, and −1.00 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. The log KD of NOR in the LE (1%) was −1.22, −1.25, and −0.96 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. Conclusions Taken together, the Intralipid emulsion did not alter vasoconstriction induced by EPI or NOR that seems to be due to the hydrophilicity of EPI or NOR, leading to sustained hemodynamic support produced by EPI or NOR used during LE resuscitation.

Background: Epinephrine (EPI) or norepinephrine (NOR) is widely used to treat cardiovascular collapse during lipid emulsion (LE) resuscitation for drug toxicity. However, the effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an LE (Intralipid) on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI and NOR in isolated rat aorta. Methods: The effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated rat aorta was examined. Additionally, the effect of LE on the calcium increase caused by EPI or NOR was investigated. The distribution constant (KD: lipid to aqueous phase) of EPI or NOR between a LE (1%) and an aqueous phase was determined. Results: LE (1 and 2%) did not significantly alter vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated endothelium-intact aorta. Moreover, the LE did not significantly alter the increased calcium level caused by EPI or NOR. The log KD of EPI in the LE (1%) was −0.71, −0.99, and −1.00 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. The log KD of NOR in the LE (1%) was −1.22, −1.25, and −0.96 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. Conclusions Taken together, the Intralipid emulsion did not alter vasoconstriction induced by EPI or NOR that seems to be due to the hydrophilicity of EPI or NOR, leading to sustained hemodynamic support produced by EPI or NOR used during LE resuscitation.

Background: Epinephrine (EPI) or norepinephrine (NOR) is widely used to treat cardiovascular collapse during lipid emulsion (LE) resuscitation for drug toxicity. However, the effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an LE (Intralipid) on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI and NOR in isolated rat aorta. Methods: The effect of LE on the vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated rat aorta was examined. Additionally, the effect of LE on the calcium increase caused by EPI or NOR was investigated. The distribution constant (KD: lipid to aqueous phase) of EPI or NOR between a LE (1%) and an aqueous phase was determined. Results: LE (1 and 2%) did not significantly alter vasoconstriction caused by EPI or NOR in isolated endothelium-intact aorta. Moreover, the LE did not significantly alter the increased calcium level caused by EPI or NOR. The log KD of EPI in the LE (1%) was −0.71, −0.99, and −1.00 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. The log KD of NOR in the LE (1%) was −1.22, −1.25, and −0.96 at 20, 50, and 100 mM ionic strength, respectively. Conclusions Taken together, the Intralipid emulsion did not alter vasoconstriction induced by EPI or NOR that seems to be due to the hydrophilicity of EPI or NOR, leading to sustained hemodynamic support produced by EPI or NOR used during LE resuscitation.