1.Renal and Urinary Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;73(5):260-268
The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing rapidly and extra-intestinal manifestations in IBD are also increasing. The prevalence of renal and urinary involvement in IBD ranges from 4–23%. Nephrolithiasis is the most common urinary complication in IBD patients. Parenchymal renal disease is rare but has been well documented and presents most commonly as glomerulonephritis or tubulointerstitial nephritis. The overall morbidity of IBD-related renal manifestations is significant. Therefore, a high index of clinical suspicion and optimal monitoring of the renal function are needed for the early diagnosis and prevention of IBD-related renal manifestations and complications.
Early Diagnosis
;
Glomerulonephritis
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
;
Kidney
;
Nephritis, Interstitial
;
Nephrolithiasis
;
Prevalence
2.Renal and Urinary Manifestations of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2019;73(5):260-268
The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing rapidly and extra-intestinal manifestations in IBD are also increasing. The prevalence of renal and urinary involvement in IBD ranges from 4–23%. Nephrolithiasis is the most common urinary complication in IBD patients. Parenchymal renal disease is rare but has been well documented and presents most commonly as glomerulonephritis or tubulointerstitial nephritis. The overall morbidity of IBD-related renal manifestations is significant. Therefore, a high index of clinical suspicion and optimal monitoring of the renal function are needed for the early diagnosis and prevention of IBD-related renal manifestations and complications.
Early Diagnosis
;
Glomerulonephritis
;
Humans
;
Incidence
;
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
;
Kidney
;
Nephritis, Interstitial
;
Nephrolithiasis
;
Prevalence
4.Are you ready to accompany autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients in their treatment journey? Real practice for selecting rapid progressors and treatment with tolvaptan
Kosin Medical Journal 2023;38(2):87-97
Tolvaptan treatment is costly, often accompanied by aquaresis-related adverse events, and requires careful monitoring by medical staff due to the possibility of hepatotoxicity. Nevertheless, it is the only disease-modifying drug to date that has been shown to successfully delay renal replacement therapy. For more patients to receive proper treatment, medical doctors, the rest of the medical team, and the patient must all work together. This paper reviews parameters that can help identify rapid autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progressors, who are the target of tolvaptan therapy. It is expected that these parameters will help nephrologists learn practical prescription methods and identify patients who can benefit from tolvaptan treatment. Although several strategies can be used to find rapid progressors, the present review focuses on a practical method to identify rapid progressors according to the presence or absence of evidence and the factors associated with rapid progression based on the Mayo image classification.
5.Changes in Insulin Sensitivity and Lipid Profile in Renal Transplant Recipients Converted from Cyclosporine or Standard Release Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus.
Joung Wook YANG ; Ye Na KIM ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
The Journal of the Korean Society for Transplantation 2017;31(3):126-132
BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (Tac) can cause impaired insulin release and dyslipidemia, and may affect the development of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. However, these effects on insulin sensitivity and lipid profile have not been compared in renal transplant recipients receiving traditional twice-daily tacrolimus (TacBID) or cyclosporine and those receiving once-daily prolonged release formulation of tacrolimus (TacOD). METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective study of 15 stable non-diabetic renal transplant recipients to observe the changes in insulin sensitivity and lipid profiles for 1 year at a tertiary hospital. We evaluated the levels of hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, serum creatinine, fasting plasma glucose, fasting insulin, homeostatic model assessment of β-cell (HOMA-β) and HOMA-insulin resistance index at baseline and at 2 and 4 months. To analyze differences in parameters, we conducted a Wilcoxon rank sum test and general linear model (GLM)-repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) in both groups (cyclosporine to TacOD conversion group/TacBID to TacOD conversion group). RESULTS: At baseline, parameters did not differ between groups. GLM-repeated measures ANOVA revealed no change in insulin sensitivity or lipid profile after conversion at baseline or at 2 and 4 months. There were no complications after conversion from standard TacBID or cyclosporine to TacOD. CONCLUSIONS: There was no change in insulin sensitivity or lipid profile in renal transplant recipients. Any conversion from TacBID to TacOD should be performed in a controlled manner under close surveillance.
Apolipoprotein A-I
;
Apolipoproteins
;
Blood Glucose
;
Cholesterol
;
Creatinine
;
Cyclosporine*
;
Diabetes Mellitus
;
Dyslipidemias
;
Fasting
;
Insulin Resistance*
;
Insulin*
;
Kidney Transplantation
;
Linear Models
;
Lipoproteins
;
Prospective Studies
;
Tacrolimus*
;
Tertiary Care Centers
;
Transplant Recipients*
;
Triglycerides
6.The influence of hypophosphatemia on outcomes of low- and high-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.
Soo Young KIM ; Ye Na KIM ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice 2017;36(3):240-249
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of hypophosphatemia in major clinical outcomes of patients treated with low- or high-intensity continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from 492 patients. We divided patients into two CRRT groups based on treatment intensity (greater than or equal to or less than 40 mL/kg/hour of effluent generation) and measured serum phosphate level daily during CRRT. RESULTS: We obtained a total of 1,440 phosphate measurements on days 0, 1, and 2 and identified 39 patients (7.9%), 74 patients (15.0%), and 114 patients (23.1%) with hypophosphatemia on each of these respective days. In patients treated with low-intensity CRRT, there were 23 episodes of hypophosphatemia/1,000 patient days, compared with 83 episodes/1,000 patient days in patients who received high-intensity CRRT (P < 0.01). Multiple Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, utilization of vasoactive drugs, and arterial pH on the second day of CRRT were significant predictors of mortality, while serum phosphate level was not a significant contributor to mortality. CONCLUSION: APACHE score, use of vasoactive drugs, and arterial pH on the second CRRT day were identified as significant predictors of mortality. Hypophosphatemia might not be a major risk factor of increased mortality in patients treated with CRRT.
Acute Kidney Injury*
;
APACHE
;
Critical Illness*
;
Humans
;
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
;
Hypophosphatemia*
;
Mortality
;
Renal Replacement Therapy*
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Risk Factors
7.Pre‑ and post‑hemodialysis differences in heart failure diagnosis by current heart failure guidelines in patients with end‑stage renal disease
Bong‑Joon KIM ; Su‑Hyun BAE ; Soo‑Jin KIM ; Sung‑Il IM ; Hyunsu KIM ; Jung‑Ho HEO ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Ye Na KIM ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2024;32(1):6-
Background:
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis (HD) have reduced vascular com‑ pliance and are likely to develop heart failure (HF). In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HF pre- and post-HD in ESRD using the current guidelines.
Methods:
We prospectively investigated HF in ESRD patients on HD using echocardiography pre- and post-HD. We used the structural and functional abnormality criteria of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Results:
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 62.6 years, and 40.1% were male. Forty-five patients (83.3%) had hypertension, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 20 (37.0%) had ischemic heart disease. The mean N-terminalpro brain natriuretic peptide BNP (NT-proBNP) level was 12,388.8 ± 2,592.2 pg/dL. The mean ideal body weight was 59.3 kg, mean hemodialysis time was 237.4 min, and mean real filtration was 2.8 kg. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.4%, and mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 52.0 mm in pre-HD. Post-HD echocardiography showed significantly lower left atrial volume index (33.3 ± 15.9 vs. 40.6 ± 17.1, p = 0.030), tricuspid regurgitation jet V (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (32.1 ± 10.3 vs. 38.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.005) compared with pre-HD. There were no differences in LVEF, E/E′ ratio, or left ventricular global longitudinal strain. A total of 88.9% of pre-HD patients and 66.7% of post-HD patients had either structural or functional abnor‑ malities in echocardiographic parameters according to recent HF guidelines (p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Our data showed that the majority of patients undergoing hemodialysis satisfy the diagnostic criteria for HF according to current HF guidelines. Pre-HD patients had a 22.2% higher incidence in the prevalence of func‑ tional or structural abnormalities as compared with post-HD patients.
8.Pre‑ and post‑hemodialysis differences in heart failure diagnosis by current heart failure guidelines in patients with end‑stage renal disease
Bong‑Joon KIM ; Su‑Hyun BAE ; Soo‑Jin KIM ; Sung‑Il IM ; Hyunsu KIM ; Jung‑Ho HEO ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Ye Na KIM ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2024;32(1):6-
Background:
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis (HD) have reduced vascular com‑ pliance and are likely to develop heart failure (HF). In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HF pre- and post-HD in ESRD using the current guidelines.
Methods:
We prospectively investigated HF in ESRD patients on HD using echocardiography pre- and post-HD. We used the structural and functional abnormality criteria of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Results:
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 62.6 years, and 40.1% were male. Forty-five patients (83.3%) had hypertension, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 20 (37.0%) had ischemic heart disease. The mean N-terminalpro brain natriuretic peptide BNP (NT-proBNP) level was 12,388.8 ± 2,592.2 pg/dL. The mean ideal body weight was 59.3 kg, mean hemodialysis time was 237.4 min, and mean real filtration was 2.8 kg. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.4%, and mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 52.0 mm in pre-HD. Post-HD echocardiography showed significantly lower left atrial volume index (33.3 ± 15.9 vs. 40.6 ± 17.1, p = 0.030), tricuspid regurgitation jet V (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (32.1 ± 10.3 vs. 38.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.005) compared with pre-HD. There were no differences in LVEF, E/E′ ratio, or left ventricular global longitudinal strain. A total of 88.9% of pre-HD patients and 66.7% of post-HD patients had either structural or functional abnor‑ malities in echocardiographic parameters according to recent HF guidelines (p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Our data showed that the majority of patients undergoing hemodialysis satisfy the diagnostic criteria for HF according to current HF guidelines. Pre-HD patients had a 22.2% higher incidence in the prevalence of func‑ tional or structural abnormalities as compared with post-HD patients.
9.Pre‑ and post‑hemodialysis differences in heart failure diagnosis by current heart failure guidelines in patients with end‑stage renal disease
Bong‑Joon KIM ; Su‑Hyun BAE ; Soo‑Jin KIM ; Sung‑Il IM ; Hyunsu KIM ; Jung‑Ho HEO ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Ye Na KIM ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2024;32(1):6-
Background:
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis (HD) have reduced vascular com‑ pliance and are likely to develop heart failure (HF). In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HF pre- and post-HD in ESRD using the current guidelines.
Methods:
We prospectively investigated HF in ESRD patients on HD using echocardiography pre- and post-HD. We used the structural and functional abnormality criteria of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Results:
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 62.6 years, and 40.1% were male. Forty-five patients (83.3%) had hypertension, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 20 (37.0%) had ischemic heart disease. The mean N-terminalpro brain natriuretic peptide BNP (NT-proBNP) level was 12,388.8 ± 2,592.2 pg/dL. The mean ideal body weight was 59.3 kg, mean hemodialysis time was 237.4 min, and mean real filtration was 2.8 kg. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.4%, and mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 52.0 mm in pre-HD. Post-HD echocardiography showed significantly lower left atrial volume index (33.3 ± 15.9 vs. 40.6 ± 17.1, p = 0.030), tricuspid regurgitation jet V (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (32.1 ± 10.3 vs. 38.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.005) compared with pre-HD. There were no differences in LVEF, E/E′ ratio, or left ventricular global longitudinal strain. A total of 88.9% of pre-HD patients and 66.7% of post-HD patients had either structural or functional abnor‑ malities in echocardiographic parameters according to recent HF guidelines (p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Our data showed that the majority of patients undergoing hemodialysis satisfy the diagnostic criteria for HF according to current HF guidelines. Pre-HD patients had a 22.2% higher incidence in the prevalence of func‑ tional or structural abnormalities as compared with post-HD patients.
10.Pre‑ and post‑hemodialysis differences in heart failure diagnosis by current heart failure guidelines in patients with end‑stage renal disease
Bong‑Joon KIM ; Su‑Hyun BAE ; Soo‑Jin KIM ; Sung‑Il IM ; Hyunsu KIM ; Jung‑Ho HEO ; Ho Sik SHIN ; Ye Na KIM ; Yeonsoon JUNG ; Hark RIM
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2024;32(1):6-
Background:
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are on hemodialysis (HD) have reduced vascular com‑ pliance and are likely to develop heart failure (HF). In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HF pre- and post-HD in ESRD using the current guidelines.
Methods:
We prospectively investigated HF in ESRD patients on HD using echocardiography pre- and post-HD. We used the structural and functional abnormality criteria of the 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines.
Results:
A total of 54 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 62.6 years, and 40.1% were male. Forty-five patients (83.3%) had hypertension, 28 (51.9%) had diabetes, and 20 (37.0%) had ischemic heart disease. The mean N-terminalpro brain natriuretic peptide BNP (NT-proBNP) level was 12,388.8 ± 2,592.2 pg/dL. The mean ideal body weight was 59.3 kg, mean hemodialysis time was 237.4 min, and mean real filtration was 2.8 kg. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 62.4%, and mean left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 52.0 mm in pre-HD. Post-HD echocardiography showed significantly lower left atrial volume index (33.3 ± 15.9 vs. 40.6 ± 17.1, p = 0.030), tricuspid regurgitation jet V (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.4 m/s, p < 0.001), and right ventricular systolic pressure (32.1 ± 10.3 vs. 38.4 ± 11.6, p = 0.005) compared with pre-HD. There were no differences in LVEF, E/E′ ratio, or left ventricular global longitudinal strain. A total of 88.9% of pre-HD patients and 66.7% of post-HD patients had either structural or functional abnor‑ malities in echocardiographic parameters according to recent HF guidelines (p = 0.007).
Conclusions
Our data showed that the majority of patients undergoing hemodialysis satisfy the diagnostic criteria for HF according to current HF guidelines. Pre-HD patients had a 22.2% higher incidence in the prevalence of func‑ tional or structural abnormalities as compared with post-HD patients.