Bipolar patients often experience subjective symptoms even if they do not have active psychotic symptoms in their euthymic state. Most studies about subjective symptoms are conducted in schizophrenia, and there are few studies involving bipolar patients. We examined the nature of the subjective symptoms of bipolar patients in their euthymic state, and we also compared it to that of schizophrenia and normal control. Thirty bipolar patients, 25 patients with schizophrenia, and 21 normal control subjects were included. Subjective symptoms were assessed using the Korean version of the Frankfurter Beschwerde Fragebogen (K-FBF) and the Symptom Check List 90-R (SCL90-R). Euthymic state was confirmed by assessing objective psychopathology with the Positive and Negative Syndrome scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). K-FBF score was significantly higher in bipolar patients than in normal controls, but similar to that in schizophrenia patients (F=5.86, p=0.004, R(2)=2033.6). In contrast, SCL90-R scores did not differ significantly among the three groups. Euthymic bipolar patients experience subjective symptoms that are more confined to cognitive domain. This finding supports the hypothesis that subtle cognitive impairments persists in euthymic bipolar patients.
Adult ; Bipolar Disorder/*psychology ; Cognition Disorders/etiology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Schizophrenic Psychology

OBJECTIVES: Human rights education programs have been implemented annually since Korea enacted human rights legislation in 2009. The purpose of this study was to investigate attitudes of Korean psychiatrists toward human rights education and assess the relevance of the provided education materials. METHODS: Questionnaires comprised of 8 items were provided to 274 psychiatrists attending the April 2015 Korean Neuropsychiatric Association seminar. In addition, 12 cases related to education material developed by the Korean National Human Rights Commission were examined to determine whether the material's content was relevant and appropriate for human rights education. RESULTS: Data from 267 psychiatrists that answered all requested questions were included in the analysis. Although respondents in general accepted the beneficial intent of human rights education, the majority of respondents (71.5%) disagreed with the mandatory 4 h of annual human rights education. Approximately half of respondents (49.4%) believed that frequency of such education should be decreased. A substantial percentage of respondents (38.7%) expressed overall dissatisfaction with the education program, and more than half of respondents (55.6%) were skeptical that the current education program could produce a real difference in attitudes toward human rights. The case reviews highlighted several problems. First, all education materials were heavily weighted toward psychiatric hospitalization legal proceedings rather than human rights. Among the 12 cases examined, four were considered inappropriate for human rights education because they were presented as if human rights abuse was synonymous with violation of a law, even if the law was ambiguous. CONCLUSION: The current human rights education program does not meet psychiatrists' expectations. The results of this study suggest there is a need to reconsider the purpose and means of providing human rights education to psychiatrists.
Education* ; Hospitalization ; Human Rights Abuses ; Human Rights* ; Humans* ; Jurisprudence ; Korea ; Psychiatry* ; Surveys and Questionnaires

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) has often been cited as the basis for the abolition of involuntary hospitalization for persons with mental illness. Although the UNCRPD itself does not refer explicitly to the abolition of involuntary hospitalization, the General Comment prohibited all compulsory admission without adequate explanation. While the disability status alone may not justify the denial of legal capacity, the existence of impaired decision-making ability can raise issues regarding whether involuntary admission can be justified in the best interest of persons with mental illness. The General Comment, however, argues that involuntary admission does not comply with the CRPD which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities. This statement defies logic since the issue is whether the existence of impaired decision-making ability may be an exceptional case. It is also against the principles of beneficence to withhold treatment for persons with mental illness just for self-determination when poor outcomes are anticipated if left untreated. The concept of supported decision making suggested by the General Comment is also ambiguous, and not clearly distinguishable from substitute decision making. Another reason for the prohibition of involuntary admission relates to doubt concerning the accuracy of assessment of mental capacity, which implies adequate assessment may justify involuntary admission. In practice, it is not always complicated to assess mental capacity in order to make treatment-related decisions. The third reason concerns the argument that psychiatric treatments lack empirical evidence concerning effectiveness. Scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of psychiatric treatment is abundant. The rights of persons with mental illness are important ethical issues. However, it is doubtful whether the blanket prohibition of compulsory admission is appropriate and ethical. Critical review of the UNCRPD and the General Comment is urgent for timely treatment and for the well-being of persons with mental illness.
Beneficence ; Decision Making ; Denial (Psychology) ; Disabled Persons* ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Ethics ; Evaluation Studies as Topic* ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Logic ; United Nations*

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the drug adherence and treatment effect of the paliperidone long acting injection (LAI) in patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders. METHODS: We reviewed the medical charts of patients who were prescribed paliperidone LAI from January 2010 to April 2014. Date of each injection, last observation, and first admission after use of the drug were obtained. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used for calculation of drug adherence. The dose of paliperidone LAI, concurrent oral antipsychotics, and anticholinergic agent was also obtained. Antipsychotics dose was calculated as olanzapine equivalent dose. RESULTS: The drug adherence of the paliperidone LAI on day 365 was 65%. The reasons for all cause discontinuation were follow-up loss, no effect, poor insight, rejection, extrapyramidal symptom, pain, etc. A total dose of 9.1 mg of oral antipsychotics was decreased, while the dose of anticholinergic agent was increased. CONCLUSION: The drug adherence of the paliperidone LAI was 65%, which was concordant with previous studies. The dose of concurrent oral antipsychotics was increased, while the dose of anticholinergic agent was decreased.
Antipsychotic Agents ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Medication Adherence ; Psychotic Disorders ; Schizophrenia ; Treatment Outcome ; Paliperidone Palmitate

Objective: This randomized crossover simulation study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chest compressions, performed during 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in three different compression postures: standing posture (SP), single-leg kneeling posture (SLKP) and both legs kneeling posture (BLKP) on a manikin lying on a bed. Methods: Enrolled participants were doctors, nurses and emergency medical technicians who worked in the emergency department and performed chest compressions (CCs) without ventilation for 5 sessions (10 minutes) in the three compression postures from June to August 2019. The chest compression parameters (CCPs) such as compression depth, compression rate (CR), the accuracy of compression depth (ACD) and accuracy of relaxation (AR) were collected by the Resusci Anne PC skill report system. The statistical differences of CCPs between three postures were analyzed. Results: A total of 32 participants were enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences between SP, SLKP and BLKP on compression depth (52.6 vs. 53.2 vs. 50.9 mm, P>0.05), CR (110.2 vs. 111.8 vs. 111.6 compressions/min, P>0.05), ACD (43.7% vs. 47.0% vs. 46.3%, P>0.05), and AR (99.4% vs. 99.0% vs. 99.3%, P>0.05). There were no significant differences in CCPs according to chest compression time in the three postures. However, there was a significant difference between the SP and BLKP (16.0 vs. 14.0, P=0.023) on the Borg scale of subjective fatigability. Conclusion In our study, when rescuers performed chest compression on a hospital bed, the parameters of CCs for the three compression postures were similar.

Objective: This randomized crossover simulation study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chest compressions, performed during 10 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in three different compression postures: standing posture (SP), single-leg kneeling posture (SLKP) and both legs kneeling posture (BLKP) on a manikin lying on a bed. Methods: Enrolled participants were doctors, nurses and emergency medical technicians who worked in the emergency department and performed chest compressions (CCs) without ventilation for 5 sessions (10 minutes) in the three compression postures from June to August 2019. The chest compression parameters (CCPs) such as compression depth, compression rate (CR), the accuracy of compression depth (ACD) and accuracy of relaxation (AR) were collected by the Resusci Anne PC skill report system. The statistical differences of CCPs between three postures were analyzed. Results: A total of 32 participants were enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences between SP, SLKP and BLKP on compression depth (52.6 vs. 53.2 vs. 50.9 mm, P>0.05), CR (110.2 vs. 111.8 vs. 111.6 compressions/min, P>0.05), ACD (43.7% vs. 47.0% vs. 46.3%, P>0.05), and AR (99.4% vs. 99.0% vs. 99.3%, P>0.05). There were no significant differences in CCPs according to chest compression time in the three postures. However, there was a significant difference between the SP and BLKP (16.0 vs. 14.0, P=0.023) on the Borg scale of subjective fatigability. Conclusion In our study, when rescuers performed chest compression on a hospital bed, the parameters of CCs for the three compression postures were similar.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a Korean version of a mood chart application on an Android platform. METHODS: This application is based on the traditional mood chart. Eighteen adults with DSM-5 bipolar disorder were enrolled from November 2016 to March 2017. They were asked to rate their daily mood scores and severity of irritability and impulsivity for six months. Their clinicians rated their symptom severity monthly using the Clinical Global Impression-7 (CGI-7) scale. After six months, the participants completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the application. RESULTS: Of the 18 patients, one withdrew their consent from this study and six were males (35.3%) ; their mean age was 31.71±8.56 years. The mean follow-up duration was 159.12±49.45 days and the period of application use was 143.65±52.11 days. The mean total response rate was 59.45% and the mean response rate on the same day was 43.06%. The adherence to using the application decreased significantly declined over the duration since enrollment [odds ratio (OR)=1.008, p=0.008] but tended to increase according to age (OR=0.958, p=0.002). The application mood scores were correlated significantly with the manic (β=0.307, p=0.004) and depressive (β=−0.701, p < 0.001) subscale, and the total (β=1.026, p=0.002) of the CGI-7 (linear mixed models). The majority of subjects agreed that the application helped them manage their symptoms (92.86%), stating that the application was easy to use (78.57%). CONCLUSION: This application could be a valid and useful tool to monitor the mood symptoms of patients with bipolar disorder in Korea.
Adult ; Anonyms and Pseudonyms ; Bipolar Disorder* ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior ; Korea ; Male ; Methyltestosterone ; Mood Disorders ; Self Care ; Smartphone* ; Telemedicine

OBJECTIVES: The molecular mechanisms underlying attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the genetic susceptibility loci for ADHD in Korean children with ADHD. We performed a case-control and a family-based genome-wide association study (GWAS), as well as genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) analyses, for two symptom traits. METHODS: A total of 135 subjects (71 cases and 64 controls), for the case-control analysis, and 54 subjects (27 probands and 27 unaffected siblings), for the family-based analysis, were included. RESULTS: The genome-wide QTL analysis identified four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs7684645 near APELA, rs12538843 near YAE1D1 and POU6F2, rs11074258 near MCTP2, and rs34396552 near CIDEA) that were significantly associated with the number of inattention symptoms in ADHD. These SNPs showed possible association with ADHD in the family-based GWAS, and with hyperactivity-impulsivity in genome-wide QTL analyses. Moreover, association signals in the family-based QTL analysis for the number of inattention symptoms were clustered near genes IL10, IL19, SCL5A9, and SKINTL. CONCLUSION: We have identified four QTLs with genome-wide significance and several promising candidates that could potentially be associated with ADHD (CXCR4, UPF1, SETD5, NALCN-AS1, ERC1, SOX2-OT, FGFR2, ANO4, and TBL1XR1). Further replication studies with larger sample sizes are needed.
Adolescent* ; Case-Control Studies ; Child ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genome-Wide Association Study ; Humans ; Interleukin-10 ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Quantitative Trait Loci ; Sample Size