1.Chest Radiography in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Correlation with Clinical Course.
Joel C ZHOU ; Terrence Ch HUI ; Cher Heng TAN ; Hau Wei KHOO ; Barnaby E YOUNG ; David C LYE ; Yeong Shyan LEE ; Gregory Jl KAW
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2020;49(7):456-461
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020. A definitive diagnosis of COVID-19 is made after a positive result is obtained on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. In Singapore, rigorous contact tracing was practised to contain the spread of the virus. Nasal swabs and chest radiographs (CXR) were also taken from individuals who were suspected to be infected by COVID-19 upon their arrival at a centralised screening centre. From our experience, about 40% of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 had initial CXR that appeared "normal". In this case series, we described the temporal evolution of COVID-19 in patients with an initial "normal" CXR. Since CXR has limited sensitivity and specificity in COVID-19, it is not suitable as a first-line diagnostic tool. However, when CXR changes become unequivocally abnormal, close monitoring is recommended to manage potentially severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Adult
;
Betacoronavirus
;
Clinical Laboratory Techniques
;
Coronavirus Infections
;
complications
;
diagnosis
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Lung
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Male
;
Middle Aged
;
Pandemics
;
Pneumonia, Viral
;
complications
;
diagnostic imaging
;
Radiography
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
2.Impact of an interstitial lung disease service in the diagnosis and management of interstitial lung disease in Singapore.
Gin Tsen CHAI ; Teck Choon TAN ; Yeong Shyan LEE ; Gregory Jl KAW ; Khoon Leong CHUAH ; Yi Jing LIM ; John Arputhan ABISHEGANADEN ; Bernard Yh THONG
Singapore medical journal 2020;61(6):302-307
INTRODUCTION:
The current gold standard for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) involves an ILD clinic evaluation, followed by discussion in a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM). However, there is a paucity of data on the impact of ILD MDMs on the diagnosis and management of ILDs in Southeast Asia. We studied the clinical impact of the ILD service on the diagnosis and management of ILDs at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Singapore.
METHODS:
A single-centre retrospective review was done on 97 consecutive patients referred for evaluation to the ILD service from March 2016 to August 2017.
RESULTS:
Mean age of the patients was 67 ± 11 years. Gender distribution was almost equal (52% male), with a majority of never-smokers (63%). Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) was 1.81 ± 0.66 L (66% ± 20% predicted). The three commonest referral diagnoses were ILD of uncertain classification (n = 38, 39%), connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) (n = 24, 25%) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 16, 17%). Following evaluation by the ILD service, there was a change of diagnosis in 60 (62%) patients and a change of management in 71 (73%) patients. The majority of consensus MDM diagnoses were IPF (n = 35, 36%), CTD-ILD (n = 30, 30%) and others (n = 15, 15%). There was a significant prognostic separation between the IPF and non-IPF diagnoses made following evaluation by the ILD service.
CONCLUSION
The ILD service allowed for more precise subtyping of various ILDs. This is particularly useful for IPF patients, who can benefit from antifibrotic therapies.
3.Radiographic features of COVID-19 based on an initial cohort of 96 patients in Singapore.
Hau Wei Wei KHOO ; Terrence Chi Hong HUI ; Salahudeen Mohamed Haja MOHIDEEN ; Yeong Shyan LEE ; Charlene Jin Yee LIEW ; Shawn Shi Xian KOK ; Barnaby Edward YOUNG ; Sean Wei Xiang ONG ; Shirin KALIMUDDIN ; Seow Yen TAN ; Jiashen LOH ; Lai Peng CHAN ; Angeline Choo Choo POH ; Steven Bak Siew WONG ; Yee-Sin LEO ; David Chien LYE ; Gregory Jon Leng KAW ; Cher Heng TAN
Singapore medical journal 2021;62(9):458-465
INTRODUCTION:
Chest radiographs (CXRs) are widely used for the screening and management of COVID-19. This article describes the radiographic features of COVID-19 based on an initial national cohort of patients.
METHODS:
This is a retrospective review of swab-positive patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to four different hospitals in Singapore between 22 January and 9 March 2020. Initial and follow-up CXRs were reviewed by three experienced radiologists to identify the predominant pattern and distribution of lung parenchymal abnormalities.
RESULTS:
In total, 347 CXRs of 96 patients were reviewed. Initial CXRs were abnormal in 41 (42.7%) out of 96 patients. The mean time from onset of symptoms to CXR abnormality was 5.3 ± 4.7 days. The predominant pattern of lung abnormality was ground-glass opacity on initial CXRs (51.2%) and consolidation on follow-up CXRs (51.0%). Multifocal bilateral abnormalities in mixed central and peripheral distribution were observed in 63.4% and 59.2% of abnormal initial and follow-up CXRs, respectively. The lower zones were involved in 90.2% of initial CXRs and 93.9% of follow-up CXRs.
CONCLUSION
In a cohort of swab-positive patients, including those identified from contact tracing, we found a lower incidence of CXR abnormalities than was previously reported. The most common pattern was ground-glass opacity or consolidation, but mixed central and peripheral involvement was more common than peripheral involvement alone.
COVID-19
;
Humans
;
Lung/diagnostic imaging*
;
Radiography, Thoracic
;
Retrospective Studies
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Singapore