With the development of specialized nutrition therapy and the need for interdisciplinary approach, nutrition support teams (NSTs) were created to optimize effectiveness and safety of nutritional therapy. NSTs are interdisciplinary support teams with specialty training in nutrition that are typically comprised of physicians, dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, and others. Their role includes nutrition screening, assessment, determination of nutrition needs, recommendations for appropriate nutrition therapy, management of nutrition support therapy, and monitoring. Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in patient nutrition status and improved clinical outcomes as well as reductions in costs when patients were appropriately managed by NSTs. Organization and the role of NSTs are discussed in this review.
Humans ; Interprofessional Relations ; Malnutrition/*prevention & control ; Nutrition Therapy ; *Nutritional Status ; Nutritional Support ; *Patient Care Team

No abstract available.
Methotrexate*

Background/Aims: The tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors infliximab and adalimumab are standard treatments for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there has been no headto-head comparison of treatment efficacy and outcomes between the two agents. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and long-term outcomes of infliximab versus adalimumab treatment in biologic-naïve patients with UC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 113 biologic-naïve patients with UC who were treated between September 2012 and December 2017 (the infliximab group [n=83] and the adalimumab group [n=30]). We compared remission and response rates between these groups at 8 and 52 weeks. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to compare long-term outcomes, and logistic regression analysis and Cox-proportional hazard regression models to assess factors affecting outcomes. Results: The median follow-up duration was 25.8 months. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rate of clinical remission or clinical response at 8 or 52 weeks. Multivariate analyses also showed that long-term outcomes were not significantly different (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 2.56; p=0.208). An elevated C-reactive protein level (greater than 5 mg/L) was a significant predictive factor for poor outcomes (adjusted HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.37 to 3.70; p=0.001). During the follow-up period, the rates of adverse event were not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.441). Conclusions In our study, infliximab and adalimumab had similar treatment efficacy and longterm outcomes in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe UC.

BACKGROUND: The influence of family history (FH) on cancer recurrence and survival among patients with established colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association of FH with cancer recurrence, survival, and the incidence of colorectal adenomas in patients with CRC. METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage III CRC diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 and followed-up in Severance Hospital were retrospectively enrolled and followed until December 2014. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to FH of CRC or colorectal neoplasm were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier curve. RESULTS: Among analyzed 979 patients, 69 (7.0%) was identified as having a FH of CRC in a first-degree relative. During a median follow-up of 9.6 years, mortality occurred in 14 of 69 patients (20.3%) with a FH of CRC and 348 of 910 patients (38.2%) without a FH. Compared with patients without a FH, a first-degree FH of CRC, first or second-degree FH of CRC, and first-degree FH of colorectal neoplasm (CRC or polyps) were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of overall mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.52 (95% CI, 0.29–0.92), 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30–0.88), and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.28–0.82), respectively. However, DFS improvement was significant only when the definition of FH was FH of colorectal neoplasm (adjusted HR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36–0.89). The incidence of adenoma and advanced adenoma was not different according to the FH. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stage III CRC receiving curative surgery, a FH of colorectal neoplasm was associated with a reduction in cancer recurrence and mortality. The larger scaled studies are needed.
Adenoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms ; Disease-Free Survival ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Incidence ; Mortality ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies

Background/Aims: Limited knowledge exists regarding the optimal timing and relative advantages of primary surgery compared to medical treatment in ileocecal Crohn’s disease (CD). This study aimed to compare long-term outcomes between medication-based treatment versus surgery in newly diagnosed ileocecal CD patients in an Asian population. Methods: Among the 885 patients diagnosed with CD and enrolled in the study site hospital cohort between 1980 and 2013, 93 (10.5%) had ileocecal CD. Patients were categorized into either the surgical or medical remission group based on their initial management strategy that led to remission. The rates of relapse, hospitalization, and surgery after achieving remission were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: The numbers of patients assigned to surgical and medical remission groups were 15 (17.0%) and 73 (83.0%), respectively. The surgical remission group exhibited a lower relapse rate and longer maintenance of remission (10.7 vs. 3.7 yr; p = 0.017) during a median follow-up of 6.6 years. Hospitalization after the first remission tended to be lower in the surgical remission group (p = 0.054). No cases required repeated intestinal resection after the initial surgical remission, whereas a 23% surgery rate was reported at 5 years after initial medical treatment (p = 0.037). In the multivariable analysis, the initial medication-based treatment was significantly associated with relapse (hazard ratio = 3.23, p = 0.039). Conclusions In selected cases of localized ileocecal CD, ileocolic resection might be a favorable alternative to medication- based treatment, as it demonstrates a lower relapse rate and longer maintenance of remission.

Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine with unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, making it an ideal candidate for sedation during endoscopic procedures. Distinguished by its rapid onset and short duration of action, remimazolam offers a safer and more efficient alternative to traditional sedatives, such as midazolam and propofol, with fewer side effects, such as hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression. This article reviews the characteristics of remimazolam and its practical advantages, including ease of use, quick recovery time, and minimal residual sedation, emphasizing its potential to improve patient safety and procedural efficiency in clinical endoscopy settings.