OBJECTIVETo study the therapeutic efficacy of manipulative reduction and percutaneous pin fixation for the treatment of severely displaced distal tibial fractures in children.

METHODSFrom May 2009 to December 2012,56 children with severely displaced distal tibial fractures were analyzed, who had been treated with manipulative reduction and percutaneous pin fixation. Preoperative fractures were confirmed as severely displaced fractures by X-ray apparatus. There were 33 boys and 23 girls,ranging in age from 3 to 14 years, with an average of 10.1 years. All the fractures were closed without vascular or nerve injuries. According to the bone fracture type, under C-arm fluoroscopy, functional reduction was achieved by manipulative reduction. The fractures were fixed with percutaneous pins. Postoperative X-ray confirmed the functional reduction. Follow-up indexes were recorded: intra-operative and postoperative complications,postoperative radiographic examination, lower extremity length and range of ankle motion. Ankle score system of Teeny was used to evaluate ankle function.

RESULTSAll the patients were followed up, and the duration ranged from 3 to 46 months, with an average duration of 19.4 months. According to the Teeny score standard, 35 patients got an excellent result, 7 good and 3 fair. Pin track reaction was found in 4 cases. The X-ray showed all the fractures healed without shortening deformity or epiphyseal arrest at early stage. All the patients could participate in the normal physical activities, having a normal range of motion and excellent strength of the ankle joint.

CONCLUSIONThe method of manipulative reduction and percutaneous pin fixation is a safe and convenient treatment for severely displaced distal tibial fractures in children. It has several advantages as follow: micro-trauma, tiny tissue damage, firm fixation, and the patients can exercise the function of ankle early, suggesting that it is an effective treatment method.

Adolescent ; Adult ; Bone Nails ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Male ; Manipulation, Orthopedic ; methods ; Middle Aged ; Tibial Fractures ; surgery

Fractures of distal humerus in elderly patients are difficult to treat, as diminished bone mineral quality and increased trauma-associated articular surfaces destruction may make stable joint reconstruction even more difficult. In active patients, internal fixation is still a primary choice because of use age of total elbow replacement, but disagreements have still existed on how to treat these fractures in elderly patients. In the past years, treatment of fractures of distal humerus make much progress, including the introduction of dual plates fixation, widespread application of three-dimensional CT reconstruction, recognition of complicated fractures, understanding of the parallel plate technique, application of periarticular plates, and the selective use of total elbow arthroplasty. This article is an overview in treating options of fracture of distal humerus in the elderly patients by review the civil and overseas involved literatures.
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Elbow Joint ; surgery ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; surgery ; Male

Standard endovascular repair of iliac/aortoiliac pathologies can lead to complications, such as buttock claudication, colon ischemia and erectile dysfunction. Branch grafts have been developed but require at least 6 weeks for customization and are not currently available in China; they are also quite expensive. To our knowledge, modified fenestrated stent grafts (MFSGs) are a safe and effective alternative for treating patients with juxtarenal aneurysms. Most MFSGs are used for the preservation of renal and left subclavian arteries. Few cases of MFSGs have been reported in the treatment of iliac pathologies. The use of an MFSG is decided on a case-by-case basis. This report presents our first clinical use of an MFSG for preservation of the internal iliac artery.
Aneurysm ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis* ; Buttocks ; China ; Colon ; Erectile Dysfunction ; Humans ; Iliac Artery* ; Ischemia ; Male ; Pathology ; Stents* ; Subclavian Artery ; Transplants

OBJECTIVESTo investigate the safe distance from the tip of the cannulated screw to the apex of the femoral head, and to avoid cutting out of the cannulated screws from the femoral head.

METHODSFrom November 2007 to April 2008, the placement configuration of the cannulated screws in the femoral head on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view was investigated. And the relation between the three-dimensional configuration and the two-dimensional perpendicular view of the femoral head to establish a solid geometry formula was analyzed. According to the configuration, the distances from the tips of different cannulated screws to the apex of the femoral head to confirm the screws placement within the femoral head was measured.

RESULTSThe actual risk of cutting out of the cannulated screws varied according to the different placement of the cannulated screws in the femoral head, even if the screw tips were within the femoral head on the AP and lateral radiograph. The mean diameter of femoral head was 49.8 mm. If the cannulated screw is in the center of femoral head on the lateral view, the cannulated screw would not cut out as long as it was in the femoral head on the AP view. When the angle was 22.5°on the lateral view, and under 22.5°on the AP view, the distance from the screw tip to the apex of the femoral head would exceeded 2.2 mm. If the angle > 45°on the AP view, the distance would exceed 9.6 mm. When the angle was 45°on the lateral view, and under 22.5°on the AP view, the distance would exceed 8.2 mm. When the angle > 45°on the AP view, the distance would exceed 17.7 mm. When the angle was 67.5°on the lateral view, the distance would exceed 23.1 mm on AP view.

CONCLUSIONSIf the cannulated screw is in the center of femoral head on the lateral view, the cannulated screw won't cut out as long as it is in the femoral head on the AP view. The angle is larger on the AP and lateral view (especially on the lateral view), and the distance is longer.

Adult ; Aged ; Bone Screws ; Female ; Femoral Neck Fractures ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Femur Head ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Fluoroscopy ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; methods ; Humans ; Intraoperative Care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Young Adult

Objective To explore clinical implications of pleural effusion in thoracic endovascular aorta repair (TEVAR) of type B aortic dissection.Methods Clinical data of 28 patients (23 males,5 females) hospitalized from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016 were analyzed retrospectively.There were ruptured aortic dissection (RAD) (n =7) and the contained aortic dissection (CAD) (n =21).26 patients underwent TEVAR,and two patients received conservative treatment.Results 26 patients received TEVAR and operations were successful.2 patients treated conservatively died.Six patients had bilateral pleural effusion,while 20 had left pleural effusion and two had right pleural effusion.The distribution of pleural effusion was significantly different between CAD and RAD group (x2 =10.4,P ＜ 0.05),and the rupture risk was the highest in right sided pleural effusion.The median volume of pleural effusion on right side in RAD group are higher than that in CAD group (Z =-3.293,P =0.001).One patient died of sudden death on post-op 9th day.Pleural effusion disappeared in all 24 patients who were followed-up for more than 3 months.There were no ensuing pleural thickening,pulmonary atelectasis,and lung consolidation.Conclusious Pleural effusion on left side are common in type B aortic dissection,while bulk right pleural effusion may indicate impending rupture.Endovascular therapy is a feasible,safe and effective therapy for aortic dissection with pleural effusion.

BACKGROUND: The open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was a standard treatment approach for fracture at distal humerus intercondylar, whereas the optimal way before ORIF remains inconclusive. We, therefore, performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of olecranon osteotomy vs. triceps-sparing approach for patients with distal humerus intercondylar fracture. METHODS: The electronic searches were systematically performed in PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from initial inception till December 2019. The primary endpoint was the incidence of excellent/good elbow function, and the secondary endpoints included Mayo elbow performance score, duration of operation, blood loss, and complications. RESULTS: Nine studies involving a total of 637 patients were selected for meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between olecranon osteotomy and triceps-sparing approach for the incidence of excellent/good elbow function (odds ratio [OR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-2.75; P = 0.371), Mayo elbow performance score (weight mean difference [WMD]: 0.17; 95% CI: -2.56 to 2.89; P = 0.904), duration of operation (WMD: 4.04; 95% CI: -28.60 to 36.69; P = 0.808), blood loss (WMD: 33.61; 95% CI: -18.35 to 85.58; P = 0.205), and complications (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 0.49-7.60; P = 0.349). Sensitivity analyses found olecranon osteotomy might be associated with higher incidence of excellent/good elbow function, longer duration of operation, greater blood loss, and higher incidence of complications as compared with triceps-sparing approach. CONCLUSIONS This study found olecranon osteotomy did not yield additional benefit on the incidence of excellent/good elbow function, while the duration of operation, blood loss, and complications in patients treated with olecranon osteotomy might be inferior than triceps-sparing approach.
Elbow Joint/surgery* ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures/surgery* ; Humerus ; Olecranon Process/surgery* ; Osteotomy ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of olecranon sled in treating olecranal fracture. METHODS: Four patients with olecranal fracture treated by olecranon sled in March 2017, including 2 males and 2 females, age of 40, 46, 47, 72 years old, 3 patients on the left side and 1 patient on the right side. All patients were caused by falling down. Fracture were transverse, oblique and slightly compressive articular surface fracture. The time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to 3 days. Operative time, blood loss, complications and flexion and extension of elbow joint, and function of forearm were observed, VAS score was used to evaluate relieve degree of pain, and Mayo score was applied to assess recovery of elbow function. RESULTS: Four patients were followed up until September 2018. Operative time ranged from 40 to 60 min, blood loss was for 20 to 40 ml, and no complications occurred. All fracture were healed at 4 months after operation. Elbow flexion was for 140° to 150°, extension of elbow was from 0° and extend to 10°, activity of flexion and extension ranged from 140 ° to 160°, MEPS score was 100. No pain occurred during doing activity, and VAS score was 0. CONCLUSIONS Low-profile design and integrated design of olecranon sled could avoid irritation of tension band and plate, and it is a simple and ideal internal fixation method for simple and mildly comminuted olecranon fracture, which is not suitable for severely comminuted olecranon fracture.
Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Elbow Joint ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Fractures, Comminuted ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Olecranon Process ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulna Fractures

BACKGROUNDInfection and aseptic loosening are common complications of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and often require revision surgery. However, bone defects, along with other complications, bring an extra difficulty to the second surgery, especially for patients with a massive bone defect in the proximal ulna. Several methods including allograft or autograft have been introduced into practice, but none sufficiently solves these problems.

METHODSWe conducted a new surgical method for patients with a massive ulnar bone defect needing revision TEA. During revision arthroplasty, the ulnar prosthesis was inserted into the radius as a salvage procedure. Four consecutive patients received revision arthroplasty with this method between 2013 and 2016. Patients' data were collected to evaluate the clinical outcome.

RESULTSAll patients had a Grade III ulnar bone defect. At the last follow-up session, all patients reported a painless, functional elbow joint. Three patients suffered from a periprosthetic infection that was completely cured using the two-stage method. No major complications, including infection, aseptic loosening, or wound problems were found. One patient had a transient ulnar neuritis, and another had a transient radial neuritis. Both patients had full recovery at the last follow-up session.

CONCLUSIONSInserting an ulnar prosthesis into the radius is a novel procedure for patients with a massive bone defect due to infection or aseptic loosening. It is a safe, quick, and effective treatment with a promising short-term outcome. This method should be provided as a salvage procedure for patients with a nonreconstructable ulnar bone defect.

Arthroplasty, Replacement ; methods ; Elbow ; surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prostheses and Implants ; Radius ; surgery ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Ulna ; surgery

OBJECTIVE: To analysis clinical effects of open reduction and internal fixation in treating Gustilo type I and II patients with open distal humeral fracture. METHODS: From 2013 May to 2017 June, 24 patient with Gustilo grade I and II open distal humeral fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation, including 20 males and 4 females, aged from 14 to 65 years old with an average of (41.3±13.1) years old. According to Gustilo classification, 16 patients were type I, 8 patients were typeII. Range of motion, complications and secondary surgery were recorded; elbow function were evaluated with VAS (visual analogue scale), MEPS (Mayo elbow performance score) and QuickDASH (quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand) at 12 months after operation. RESULTS: All patients were followed up from 15 to 60 years with an average of (34.1±11.9) months. VAS score was 0(0, 2); flexion and extension ranged from 50 °to 145° with an average of (115.2±26.1)°; the range of rotation ranged from 100° to 160° with an average of (147.7±17.0)°. MEPS score was for 75 to 90 (90.0±9.1), and 14 patients got excellent result, 10 patients moderate. Quick DASH score was 4.6(0, 14.8). There were 22 patients occurred complications, such as ulnar nerve symptom and internal fixation irritation, and 10 patients accepted the second operation. CONCLUSIONS Open reduction and internal fixation is a safe and efficient method in treating Gustilo type I and II patients with open distal humeral fractures, which has an advantages of good range of movement and function score.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Bone Plates ; Elbow Joint ; Female ; Fracture Fixation, Internal ; Humans ; Humeral Fractures ; surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult