Radiofrequency ablation has been frequently performed on intra-hepatic solid tumor, namaly, hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic tumor and cholangiocarcinoma, for take the cure. But, the reports of radiofrequency ablation for intrahepatic simple cysts are few. In vitro experiment of animal and in vivo treatment for intrahepatic cysts of human had been reported in rare cases. We report 4 cases of radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic intrahepatic cysts.
Animals ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Catheter Ablation* ; Cholangiocarcinoma ; Humans

Objective: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a pre-stage of dementia. This study aims to develop a cognitive intervention treatment program (CITP) as a non-pharmacological therapy, apply this program into MCI patients, and examine patients’ changes in cognitive function. Methods: Among 16 patients with MCI, 10 patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group and 6 patients were assigned into the control group. The patients assigned to the experimental group participated in the CITP once a week for a period of 15 weeks.The control group were suggested to live a normal daily life without CITP given. After 15 weeks (3 months), pre- and post-investigations, such as cognitive function test, emotional test, brain oxygen saturation test, were conducted and compared for each group. Results: The cognitive function scores and the brain oxygen saturation levels taken during the Verbal Fluency Test showed a sta-tistically significant difference between those of experimental and the control groups. To be specific, while the cognitive function score improved in the experimental group, there was a decline in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in emo-tional changes between two groups. Looking at the changes within each group, the overall cognitive function score of the experimen-tal group was significantly increased, but no pre- and post-significantly changes were observed in brain oxygen saturation activation. On the other hand, the control group showed a statistically significant decline in the attention criteria of the cognitive functional ar-eas, and no statistically significant changed in brain activation. Conclusion The result from this study has given some promising views on maintaining and improving the deteriorating cognitive function in patients with MCI. Conducting CITP on patients is expected to strengthen the neural network. Eventually, there would be a less deterioration of cognitive function and less progression of MCI into dementia.

Background: and Purpose To determine the imaging characteristics and cutoff value of18F-florapronol (FC119S) quantitative analysis for detecting β-amyloid positivity and Al- zheimer’s disease (AD), we compared the findings of FC119S and 18F-florbetaben (FBB) positron-emission tomography (PET) in patients with cognitive impairment. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 35 patients with cognitive impairment who underwent FBB-PET, FC119S-PET, and brain magnetic resonance imaging. We measured global and vertex-wise standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) using a surface-based method with the cerebellar gray matter as reference. Optimal global FC119S SUVR cutoffs were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves for β-amyloid positivity based on the global FBB SUVR of 1.478 and presence of AD, respectively. We evaluated the global and vertex-wise SUVR correlations between the two tracers. In addition, we performed correlation analysis for global or vertex-wise SUVR of each tracer with the vertex-wise cortical thicknesses. Results: The optimal global FC119S SUVR cutoff value was 1.385 both for detecting β-amyloid positivity and for detecting AD. Based on the global SUVR cutoff value of each tracer, 32 (91.4%) patients had concordant β-amyloid positivity. The SUVRs of FC119S and FBB had strong global (r=0.72) and vertex-wise (r>0.7) correlations in the overall cortices, except for the parietal and temporal cortices (0.4Conclusions Quantitative FC119S-PET analysis provided reliable information for detecting β-amyloid deposition and the presence of AD.

The study was conducted to examine the prevalence and degree of peri-implantitis in implant-supported bridges compared to splinted crowns in 3-unit and 4-unit posterior edentulous areas. A total of 229 implant sites from 79 patients who had received implants at the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were evaluated. The observation period ranged from 2 to 12 years. Patient characteristics and implant-related factors were investigated. After surgery and prosthetic treatment, radiographic evaluations were performed. Also, to identify factors that could affect the prognosis of the implants, Fisher’s exact tests and chi-square were used. In addition, the mean distance between crestal bone levels and implant platform was compared between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns using the Mann-Whitney U test. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean distances between implant platforms and bone levels in either restoration type. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 15% in splinted crowns and 13% in bridges, with restoration type showing no significant association. However, middle implant showed the highest rate of peri-implantitis compared to other positions. Furthermore, bone augmentation and implant sites (maxilla or mandible) showed significant association with peri-implantitis. In conclusion, restoration type does not influence the prevalence or severity of peri-implantitis, but implant position affect the rate of peri-implantitis. Clinicians should consider bone quality when choosing between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns.

The study was conducted to examine the prevalence and degree of peri-implantitis in implant-supported bridges compared to splinted crowns in 3-unit and 4-unit posterior edentulous areas. A total of 229 implant sites from 79 patients who had received implants at the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were evaluated. The observation period ranged from 2 to 12 years. Patient characteristics and implant-related factors were investigated. After surgery and prosthetic treatment, radiographic evaluations were performed. Also, to identify factors that could affect the prognosis of the implants, Fisher’s exact tests and chi-square were used. In addition, the mean distance between crestal bone levels and implant platform was compared between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns using the Mann-Whitney U test. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean distances between implant platforms and bone levels in either restoration type. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 15% in splinted crowns and 13% in bridges, with restoration type showing no significant association. However, middle implant showed the highest rate of peri-implantitis compared to other positions. Furthermore, bone augmentation and implant sites (maxilla or mandible) showed significant association with peri-implantitis. In conclusion, restoration type does not influence the prevalence or severity of peri-implantitis, but implant position affect the rate of peri-implantitis. Clinicians should consider bone quality when choosing between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns.

The study was conducted to examine the prevalence and degree of peri-implantitis in implant-supported bridges compared to splinted crowns in 3-unit and 4-unit posterior edentulous areas. A total of 229 implant sites from 79 patients who had received implants at the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were evaluated. The observation period ranged from 2 to 12 years. Patient characteristics and implant-related factors were investigated. After surgery and prosthetic treatment, radiographic evaluations were performed. Also, to identify factors that could affect the prognosis of the implants, Fisher’s exact tests and chi-square were used. In addition, the mean distance between crestal bone levels and implant platform was compared between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns using the Mann-Whitney U test. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean distances between implant platforms and bone levels in either restoration type. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 15% in splinted crowns and 13% in bridges, with restoration type showing no significant association. However, middle implant showed the highest rate of peri-implantitis compared to other positions. Furthermore, bone augmentation and implant sites (maxilla or mandible) showed significant association with peri-implantitis. In conclusion, restoration type does not influence the prevalence or severity of peri-implantitis, but implant position affect the rate of peri-implantitis. Clinicians should consider bone quality when choosing between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns.

The study was conducted to examine the prevalence and degree of peri-implantitis in implant-supported bridges compared to splinted crowns in 3-unit and 4-unit posterior edentulous areas. A total of 229 implant sites from 79 patients who had received implants at the Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were evaluated. The observation period ranged from 2 to 12 years. Patient characteristics and implant-related factors were investigated. After surgery and prosthetic treatment, radiographic evaluations were performed. Also, to identify factors that could affect the prognosis of the implants, Fisher’s exact tests and chi-square were used. In addition, the mean distance between crestal bone levels and implant platform was compared between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns using the Mann-Whitney U test. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean distances between implant platforms and bone levels in either restoration type. The prevalence of peri-implantitis was 15% in splinted crowns and 13% in bridges, with restoration type showing no significant association. However, middle implant showed the highest rate of peri-implantitis compared to other positions. Furthermore, bone augmentation and implant sites (maxilla or mandible) showed significant association with peri-implantitis. In conclusion, restoration type does not influence the prevalence or severity of peri-implantitis, but implant position affect the rate of peri-implantitis. Clinicians should consider bone quality when choosing between implant-supported bridges and splinted crowns.

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate is the first-line drug in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibiting higher efficacy and better tolerability than most other DMARDs. To have a better understanding of the anti-arthritic mechanism of methotrexate, we investigated the effect of methotrexate on suppressing the autoimmune inflammatory and destructive arthritis in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice. METHODS: The effects of methotrexate on joint inflammation were assessed by clinical scoring and histologic analysis. Levels of cytokines and autoreactive antibodies were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and ELISA. The population of TH17 and Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells and phosphorylation of their critical transcription activators, STAT3 and STAT5, were examined by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry, respectively. RESULTS: Treatment with methotrexate significantly alleviated joint inflammation and cartilage destruction in CIA. Serum levels of total immunoglobulins G, G1, G2a specific to type II collagen were also reduced considerably in methotrexate-treated mice. The drug inhibited the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1beta, TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-17 in arthritic joints ex vivo as well as by splenocytes in vitro. Moreover, methotrexate treatment resulted in reciprocal modulation of TH17 cells and Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells in spleen tissues, in which TH17 cells were decreased and Treg cells in number were increased. Subsequent analysis of CD4+T cells showed that phosphorylation of STAT3 was decreased whereas phosphorylation of STAT5 was increased in methotrexate-treated mice. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate treatment effectively suppressed autoimmune arthritis and restored homeostasis of the immune system by reciprocal regulation of TH17 and Treg cells in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis.
Animals ; Antibodies ; Antirheumatic Agents ; Arthritis ; Arthritis, Experimental ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid ; Cartilage ; Collagen Type II ; Cytokines ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Flow Cytometry ; Homeostasis ; Immune System ; Immunoglobulins ; Immunohistochemistry ; Inflammation ; Interleukin-17 ; Interleukin-6 ; Joints ; Methotrexate ; Mice ; Microscopy, Fluorescence ; Phosphorylation ; Spleen ; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory ; Th17 Cells ; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Background: and Purpose This study aimed to determine the neuropsychological differences between patients with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) with a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of ≤1. Methods: We examined 168 patients with AD (126 with CDR score=0.5, 42 with CDR score=1) and 169 patients with DLB (104 with CDR score=0.5, 65 with CDR score=1) whose diagnoses were supported by 18F-flobetaben positron-emission tomography (PET) and 18F-N-(3-fluoropropyl)-2β-carbon ethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl) nortropane PET. Neuropsychological test scores were compared after controlling for age, sex, and education duration. Using a cutoff motor score on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale of 20, patients with AD were further divided into AD with parkinsonism (ADP+ , n=86) and AD without parkinsonism (ADP− , n=82). Results: At CDR scores of both 0.5 and 1, the DLB group had lower scores on the attention (digit-span forward at CDR score=0.5 and backward at CDR score=1), visuospatial, and executive (color reading Stroop test at CDR score=0.5 and phonemic fluency test, Stroop tests, and digit symbol coding at CDR score=1) tests than the AD group, but higher scores on the memory tests. The ADP− and ADP+ subgroups had comparable scores on most neuropsychological tests, but the ADP+ subgroup had lower scores on the color reading Stroop test. Conclusions Patients with DLB had worse attention, visuospatial, and executive functions but better memory function than patients with AD. Parkinsonism was not uncommon in the patients with AD and could be related to attention and executive dysfunction.