Objective:To identify and characterize one Yokenella regensburgei strain(designated as CXLZQ123) isolated from a case of perionychial abscess. Methods:Strain CXLZQ123 was isolated from a patient with periungual abscess at the Dermatology Department of San County Central Hospital in June 2, 2023. The strain was initially identified through morphological and biochemical tests, followed by mass spectrometry identification, 16S rRNA sequencing and whole-genome sequencing. MEGA 11.0 was used to compare and analyze the strain′s genetic relationship with relevant species in GenBank, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed based on genetic distance to analyze its genetic evolution. Meanwhile, the average nucleotide identity between its genome and similar strains were compared.Results:The strain was identified as a Gram-negative rod. MicroScan WalkAway biochemical tests indicated that the strain was either Yokenella regensburgei (91.47%) or Hafnia alvei (8.53%). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry confirmed it as Yokenella regensburgei. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the strain showed the highest similarity(99.37%) to CIP 105435 (sequence number NR_104934.1). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of the isolated strain Yokenella regensburgei was submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the GenBank sequence number of OR230248.1. The whole-genome of CXLZQ123 were sequenced and uploaded (NCBI, SRA sequence number: SRR26510420). The average nucleotide identity between CXLZQ123 and Yokenella regensburgei strains W13 and UU2206353 were 98.82% and 99.04%, respectively. Conclusions:Through morphological observation, biochemical identification, mass spectrometry identification, 16S rRNA and whole-genome sequencing, this pathogenic strain is identified as Yokenella regensburgei. This rare bacterium is sensitive to most detected antibiotics. This study provides diagnostic and treatment experience for Yokenella regensburgei-related infections.

Objective:To assess the efficacy of a novel spatial-temporal polyp detection system in colonoscopy.Methods:This research was a retrospective comparative study. Eight hundred and thirty-three participants who underwent computer-aided detection (CADe) colonoscopy at the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital between March and June 2023 were enrolled to the experimental group, while 770 individuals who received conventional colonoscopy from March to June 2022, in the identical operation room were to the control group. The primary outcome was the adenoma detection rate (ADR), and the secondary outcomes were the polyp detection rate (PDR), adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and polyps per colonoscopy (PPC).Results:The ADR [29.3% (244/833) VS 21.7% (167/770), χ2=12.133, P<0.001] and PDR [47.9% (399/833) VS 37.9% (292/770), χ2=16.241, P<0.001] were significantly higher in the experimental group than those in the control group. Adenomas ≤5 mm [23.5% (196/833) VS 16.1% (124/770), χ2=13.808, P<0.001] and flat-type adenomas [15.1% (126/833) VS 7.3% (56/770), χ2=24.519, P<0.001] were detected in a significantly higher proportion of subjects in the experimental group than those in the control group. There were significant difference in APC [0 (0,1) VS 0 (0,1), Z=-3.698, P<0.001] and PPC [0 (0,1) VS 0 (0,1), Z=-4.424, P<0.001] between the experimental and control groups. The use of CADe system significantly increased both ADR [29.5% (167/566) VS 18.9% (89/472), χ2=15.709, P<0.001] and PDR [47.3% (268/566) VS 33.3% (157/472), χ2=21.123, P<0.001] in junior endoscopists. However, in senior endoscopists, there was no statistical significant difference in ADR [28.8% (77/267) VS 26.2% (78/298), χ2=0.502, P=0.479] or PDR [49.1% (131/267) VS 45.3% (135/298), χ2=0.800, P=0.371] with or without CADe system. Conclusion:The use of CADe system significantly increases overall polyp and adenoma detection in clinical practice, especially in the detection of diminutive and flat-type lesions. Junior endoscopists gain greater advantages from the use of CADe system than their senior peers.