Methods: This study included 509 (mean age, 54.5 years; 239 males and 270 females) patients who underwent posterior spine surgery at the department of the current study. First, clean catch urine was collected, after which a urine culture was performed for all patients before surgery. Preoperative detection of the aUTI (>105 colony-forming units/mL) rate was then determined. Subsequently, risk factors for postoperative UTI were evaluated using logistic regression analysis with the following as independent variables: age, sex, obesity, diabetes, spinal cord tumor, the preoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, JOA-bladder function, preoperative urine culture positivity, aUTI, preoperative Escherichia coli detection, the postoperative catheter placement period, instrumentation, number of surgical levels, surgery duration, and blood loss. Results: The preoperative aUTI and postoperative UTI incidences were 8.1% and 4.1%, respectively. Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis showed that the risk factor for postoperative UTI was preoperative aUTI (odds ratio, 4.234; 95% confidence interval, 1.532–11.702; p=0.005). Conclusions Preoperative aUTI is a risk factor for UTI in patients after spinal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. PURPOSE: We experienced the situation wherein some patients had new-onset pain or dysesthesia around the ring and little fingers (C8 symptom) or ulnar aspect of the forearm (T1 symptom) after cervical laminoplasty (LP). We investigated the incidence and the cause of new C8 or T1 symptoms and the clinical outcomes after C3–C6 LP or C3–C7 LP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There were some reports regarding complications after cervical LP. However, there was no report regarding C8 or T1 symptoms after cervical LP. METHODS: Among the 33 patients enrolled in this study, 11 and 22 patients were treated with C3–C6 LP and C3–C7 LP, respectively. We prospectively evaluated C8 or T1 symptoms daily postoperatively for 1 week. The distance of the posterior spinal cord shifting and posterior subarachnoid space from C2 to T1 was measured by T2-weighted midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated pre- and postoperative axial neck pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and JOA score improvement rate. RESULTS: C8 or T1 symptoms occurred in five and three patients with C3–C6 LP (45.5%) and C3–C7 LP (13.6%), respectively. The distance of the posterior subarachnoid space in C3–C6 LP at C7 was significantly shorter than that in C3–C7 LP at T1 on MRI 24 hours postoperatively (p=0.0448). Postoperative axial neck pain, pre- and postoperative JOA scores, and JOA score improvement rate were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of C8 or T1 symptoms in C3–C6 LP was higher than that in C3–C7 LP. C8 or T1 symptoms would be caused by the posterior fila radicularia and spinal cord impingement on the intact lower end of the lamina.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Fingers ; Forearm ; Humans ; Incidence ; Laminoplasty ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Neck Pain ; Paresthesia ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal Cord ; Subarachnoid Space

Purpose: The self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) for colorectal obstruction became covered by national health insurance in January 2012, and it has since become a standard treatment. Here we report the utility of SEMS for colorectal obstruction in our department. 　　Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 65 patients who underwent SEMS placement for colorectal obstruction in our department from May 2013 to December 2018. We examined age, sex, etiology of colorectal stenosis, purpose of stenting, and tumor location. 　　Results: The technical success rate was 98.5% (64/65) and the clinical success rate was 93.8% (61/65). Technical failure occurred in 1 case because the guidewire could not pass the stenosis. Adverse event rates were 1.6% within 7 days and 4.7% after 7 days. 　　Conclusion: SEMS placement had a high technical success rate and few adverse events. Clearly SEMS placement is a minimally invasive procedure that is effective for improving QOL. The safety and effectiveness of this procedure appeared to be excellent.