The purpose of this study was to clarify difficulties and countermeasures in nursing practice for foreign patients with COVID-19 who were non-English native speakers. A questionnaire was collected from 16 nurses in a COVID-19 ward. They cared for 13 non-English-speaking foreign patients from admission to discharge in the ward between May 2021 and June 2021. All nurses reported difficulties in communication related to collecting information from patients and explaining hospital care. For example, they could have simple conversations using a two-way translation device (POKETALK®) but could not understand detailed symptoms or complaints without an interpreter. Not much meaning could be inferred from a patient’s response of “OK”. The nurses reported that it was difficult to explain details of treatments, Japanese customs, and hospital rules. With the help of interpreters, they made hospital manuals and question cards in the patients’ native languages. In nursing care for foreign patients with COVID-19, it was helpful to provide explanations of Japanese customs and hospital rules before admission and to prepare hospital manuals and question cards in patients’ native languages.

A woman in her 80s was being treated for dementia. She lived in a four-generation household of 8 people. Her grandchild contracted COVID-19 and was admitted in another hospital. The 7 other family members were close contacts of the grandchild, and all of them except the woman with dementia developed COVID-19 within 3 days of onset in the grandchild. The woman’s PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 was negative. Her family thought that she could not live alone, but she was denied admission to other hospitals. Finally, she was admitted to our COVID-19 ward with her other family members at the family's request. After admission, she stayed in a room with family members, and COVID-19 treatment for her family and her care were performed with strict infection control measures in place. On hospital day 11, she and 5 family members had negative PCR test results for SARS-COV-2 and were discharged. With the growing number of dementia patients in Japan's aging society, there is the possibility that similar situations will occur increasingly often. This case suggests that recommended infection control measures are effective for preventing the spread of COVID-19 to people staying in the same room.

Recently, with the increase of laparoscopic surgery, there has also been an increase in the number of surgeries that require the head-down position for a long duration and left-right rotation. We have encountered 3 cases of brachial plexus neuropathy that was thought to be caused by such surgical positions in our institute. Currently, we have improved the fixation method and fixtures and created a neuropathy checklist, and we are conducting standardized observation and decompression programs within the team. We examined whether our current programs are effective using a body pressure measuring device for 20 patients undergoing headdown lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia. The correlation between the mean body pressure on the right shoulder after 30 min and body tilt angle was studied. We also observed changes in body pressure before and after manual decompression every 30 min while the patient was in the head-down position. Before that study, we conducted an experience questionnaire survey of 10 operating room nurses. The results indicated that there was no increase in body pressure in proportion to the body tilt angle (15-20 deg). The body pressure after decompression decreased significantly at 30, 60, and 120 min after placing the patient in the head-down lithotripsy position. There was no significant correlation between body pressure and the headdown positioning time. There was a significant correlation between body mass index (BMI) and body pressure at 30 min (r=0.474, p=0.035). Complaints of trunk displacement, shoulder pain and pressure, and head and neck traction were often noted in the nurse questionnaire. These complaints were more frequently seen in cases with a larger right-down rotation angle and higher BMI. From these results, it was concluded that decompression of the body with the current fixtures and our regular observation and decompression program using the neuropathy checklist is effective for preventing brachial plexus injury in patients undergoing lithotripsy laparoscopic surgery in the head-down position and with left-right rotation.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly in Japan. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical experience of our COVID-19 patients early in the pandemic and lessons from our experience. An outpatient fever clinic was established on April 7. Admission of COVID-19 patients was started on July 23. Between April 7 and September 30, there were 364 walk-in outpatients and emergency patients with fever. Polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA or COVID-19 antigen test were performed in all patients, and all results were negative. Twenty patients with COVID-19 were admitted to a newly established dedicated COVID-19 ward. They were discharged well. There were no cases of nosocomial infection at our hospital. Length of hospitalization was correlated with serum ferritin level at admission, serum CRP level at admission, and age. More than half the patients experienced psychological stress, and COVID-19 specialized nurses experienced some stress. It is essential to set up the medical system for COVID-19 according to the trends of the disease. Creation of our original database and our “problem notebook” were useful for treatment and care of COVID-19 patients as well as for mental care of nurses.

Objective: Because patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) were forced to stay indoors during the state of emergency, resulting in stress and a lack of physical activity, concerns about their glycemic control were raised.Patients and Methods: The 165 patients’ glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were compared during the following periods: the 4 months that were selected as a representative condition 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2018, March 2019, June 2019, and July 2019) and the latter 3 months as a 1-year follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2019, March 2020, June 2020, and July 2020).Results: The patients’ HbA1c levels were 7.32 ± 1.23, 7.44 ± 1.20, 7.16 ± 1.06, 7.01 ± 1.05, 7.23 ± 1.06, 7.45 ± 1.18, 7.15 ± 10.7, and 7.11 ± 1.17 in May 2018, March 2019, June 2019, July 2019, May 2019, March 2020, June 2020, and July 2020, respectively (expressed as mean ± standard deviation).Conclusion: The analysis showed that HbA1c levels did not worsen during the self-restraint period.