1.Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Literature Review.
Yasunori MINAMI ; Masatoshi KUDO
Gut and Liver 2013;7(1):1-6
Liver metastases occur in up to 60% of patients with colorectal cancer, and the control of liver metastases is considered to be of primary importance because it is a critical factor in determining prognosis. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy is one of the least invasive techniques for unresectable hepatic malignancies and can be performed safely using percutaneous, laparoscopic, or open surgical techniques. The local tumor progression rates after RFA for colorectal liver metastases range from 8.8% to 40.0%, and 5-year survival rates range from 20.0% to 48.5%. No prospective, randomized trials comparing the efficacy of RFA with that of surgical resection for colorectal liver metastases are currently available. However, some retrospective studies have reported that patients who received RFA had a survival rate similar to that observed in surgically treated groups, while other studies have reported better survival among patients who underwent surgical resection. The use of a laparoscopic or open surgical approach allows the repeated placement of RFA electrodes at multiple sites to ablate larger tumors. An accurate evaluation of treatment response is very important for the success of RFA therapy because a sufficient safety margin (at least 0.5 cm) can prevent local tumor progression. This review critically summarizes the current status of RFA for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
Colorectal Neoplasms
;
Electrodes
;
Humans
;
Liver
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prognosis
;
Survival Rate
2.The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid
Jae Young LEE ; Yasunori MINAMI ; Byung Ihn CHOI ; Won Jae LEE ; Yi-Hong CHOU ; Woo Kyoung JEONG ; Mi-Suk PARK ; Nobuki KUDO ; Min Woo LEE ; Ken KAMATA ; Hiroko IIJIMA ; So Yeon KIM ; Kazushi NUMATA ; Katsutoshi SUGIMOTO ; Hitoshi MARUYAMA ; Yasukiyo SUMINO ; Chikara OGAWA ; Masayuki KITANO ; Ijin JOO ; Junichi ARITA ; Ja-Der LIANG ; Hsi-Ming LIN ; Christian NOLSOE ; Odd Helge GILJA ; Masatoshi KUDO
Ultrasonography 2020;39(3):191-220
The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.