1.Endosonographic Preoperative Evaluation for Tumors of the Ampulla of Vater Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Intraductal Ultrasonography.
Naoki OKANO ; Yoshinori IGARASHI ; Seiichi HARA ; Kensuke TAKUMA ; Itaru KAMATA ; Yui KISHIMOTO ; Takahiko MIMURA ; Ken ITO ; Yasukiyo SUMINO
Clinical Endoscopy 2014;47(2):174-177
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In recent years, endoscopic snare papillectomy has been performed to treat tumors of the ampulla of Vater. This procedure requires accurate preoperative evaluation. In this study, we diagnosed the focal extension of such tumors by using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), and examined the indications for endoscopic snare papillectomy. METHODS: The subjects were 48 patients with a papillary tumor (13 patients, surgical resection; 35 patients, endoscopic snare papillectomy) who were evaluated preoperatively with EUS and IDUS. The tumor-node-metastasis classification was used for the endosonographic evaluation and pathological diagnosis of these tumors. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was 97% for diagnosing adenomas and pTis tumors, 73% for pT1 tumors, 50% for pT2 tumors, and 50% for pT3-4 tumors, for an overall accuracy of 85% for T-staging. The diagnostic accuracy of IDUS was 94% for adenomas and pTis tumors, 73% for pT1 tumors, 50% for pT2 tumors, and 100% for pT3-4 tumors, for an overall accuracy of 80% for T-staging. CONCLUSIONS: EUS and IDUS are highly capable of evaluating tumors of the ampulla of Vater preoperatively. However, these techniques are not sufficient for evaluating the focal extension of carcinomas preoperatively. Currently, endoscopic snare papillectomy is adequate for treating adenomas and pTis tumors.
Adenoma
;
Ampulla of Vater*
;
Classification
;
Diagnosis
;
Endosonography*
;
Humans
;
SNARE Proteins
;
Ultrasonography*
2.The AFSUMB Consensus Statements and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound using Sonazoid
Jae Young LEE ; Yasunori MINAMI ; Byung Ihn CHOI ; Won Jae LEE ; Yi-Hong CHOU ; Woo Kyoung JEONG ; Mi-Suk PARK ; Nobuki KUDO ; Min Woo LEE ; Ken KAMATA ; Hiroko IIJIMA ; So Yeon KIM ; Kazushi NUMATA ; Katsutoshi SUGIMOTO ; Hitoshi MARUYAMA ; Yasukiyo SUMINO ; Chikara OGAWA ; Masayuki KITANO ; Ijin JOO ; Junichi ARITA ; Ja-Der LIANG ; Hsi-Ming LIN ; Christian NOLSOE ; Odd Helge GILJA ; Masatoshi KUDO
Ultrasonography 2020;39(3):191-220
The first edition of the guidelines for the use of ultrasound contrast agents was published in 2004, dealing with liver applications. The second edition of the guidelines in 2008 reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines for the liver, as well as implementing some nonliver applications. The third edition of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidelines was the joint World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology-European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB-EFSUMB) venture in conjunction with other regional US societies such as Asian Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, resulting in a simultaneous duplicate on liver CEUS in the official journals of both WFUMB and EFSUMB in 2013. However, no guidelines were described mainly for Sonazoid due to limited clinical experience only in Japan and Korea. The new proposed consensus statements and recommendations provide general advice on the use of Sonazoid and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of Sonazoid in hepatic and pancreatobiliary applications in Asian patients and to improve patient management.