1.A Case of Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis with a 16-Year Time Interval without Evidence of Cancer Recurrence.
Shoko Merrit YAMADA ; Yusuke TOMITA ; Soichiro SHIBUI ; Takashi KUROKAWA ; Yasuhisa BABA
Journal of Breast Cancer 2017;20(2):212-216
The median time of brain metastasis from the diagnosis of breast cancer is approximately 3 years. In this case report, a 69-year-old woman demonstrated cerebellar ataxia. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed enhanced lesions in bilateral cerebellar hemispheres. She had undergone surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy for uterine and breast cancer 24 years prior and 16 years prior, respectively. Although she had not received any anticancer treatment for 10 years, no recurrences were identified using whole body scans. A partial tumor resection was performed and the histological diagnosis was an adenocarcinoma from breast cancer. As no extracranial lesions were found, gamma-knife irradiation was performed, without additional systemic chemotherapy. One month posttreatment, the tumors dramatically reduced in size and the patient completely recovered from cerebellar ataxia. Systemic chemotherapy is not always required for brain metastasis from breast cancer with a long interval period, as long as no evidence of extracranial recurrence is detected.
Adenocarcinoma
;
Aged
;
Brain*
;
Breast Neoplasms*
;
Breast*
;
Cerebellar Ataxia
;
Diagnosis
;
Drug Therapy
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
;
Neoplasm Metastasis*
;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
;
Prognosis
;
Recurrence*
;
Whole Body Imaging
2.Unenhanced region on magnetic resonance imaging represents tumor progression in uterine carcinosarcoma.
Ayami INOUE ; Ken YAMAGUCHI ; Yasuhisa KURATA ; Ryusuke MURAKAMI ; Kaoru ABIKO ; Junzo HAMANISHI ; Eiji KONDOH ; Tsukasa BABA ; Aki KIDO ; Ikuo KONISHI ; Noriomi MATSUMURA
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2017;28(5):e62-
OBJECTIVE: Carcinosarcoma of the uterine corpus has a poor prognosis. Although pathological necrosis is a prognostic factor of endometrial cancer, the clinicopathological influences of an unenhanced region observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are inconclusive. The aim of our study was to determine the clinicobiological impact of the presence of an unenhanced region on MRI, which can represent necrosis, in uterine carcinosarcoma. METHODS: The clinicopathological factors of 29 patients diagnosed with uterine carcinosarcoma were assessed retrospectively. The percentage of the tumor that was unenhanced on MRI was determined. The clinicopathological factors related to the unenhanced regions were evaluated. The prognostic significance was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. RESULTS: Although the presence of pathological necrosis was not a poor prognostic factor (p=0.704), unenhanced regions on MRI correlated with poor prognosis when the unenhanced regions in the tumor accounted for more than 10% of the total tumor (p=0.019). The percentage of unenhanced regions was positively correlated with stage (p=0.028; r=0.4691) and related to tumor size (p=0.086; r=0.3749). The Cox regression analysis indicated that the presence of lymph node (LN) metastasis and more than 10% of the tumor being unenhanced on MRI were prognostic factors of overall survival in the univariate analyses (p=0.018 and p=0.047, respectively). CONCLUSION: The unenhanced region on MRI, which represents pathological necrosis, reflects tumor progression, and semi-quantification of the region is useful to predict the prognosis in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.
Carcinosarcoma*
;
Endometrial Neoplasms
;
Female
;
Humans
;
Lymph Nodes
;
Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
;
Methods
;
Necrosis
;
Neoplasm Metastasis
;
Prognosis
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Uterine Neoplasms
3.Effects of a fertility-sparing re-treatment for recurrent atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer: a systematic literature review
Isao MURAKAMI ; Hiroko MACHIDA ; Tohru MORISADA ; Yasuhisa TERAO ; Tsutomu TABATA ; Mikio MIKAMI ; Yasuyuki HIRASHIMA ; Yoichi KOBAYASHI ; Tsukasa BABA ; Satoru NAGASE
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2023;34(4):e49-
Objective:
To examine the effectiveness of progestin re-treatment for recurrent endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN), atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AH) and endometrial cancer (EC) following initial fertility-sparing treatment.
Methods:
A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by an Expert Panel of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology Endometrial Cancer Committee. Multiple search engines, including PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database, were searched in December 2021 using the keywords “Endometrial neoplasms,” “Endometrial hyperplasia,” “Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia,” “Fertility preservation,” “Progestins,” AND “Recurrence.” Cases describing progestin re-treatment for recurrent EIN, AH and EC were compared with cases that underwent conventional hysterectomy. The primary outcomes were survival and disease recurrence, and the secondary outcome was pregnancy.
Results:
After screening 238 studies, 32 with results for recurrent treatment were identified. These studies included 365 patients (270 received progestin re-treatment and 95 underwent hysterectomy). Most progestin re-treatment involved medroxyprogesterone acetate or megestrol acetate (94.5%). Complete remission (CR) following progestin re-treatment was achieved in 219 (81.1%) cases, with 3-, 6- and 9-month cumulative CR rates of 22.8%, 51.7% and 82.6%, respectively. Progestin re-treatment was associated with higher risk of disease recurrence than conventional hysterectomy was (odds ratio [OR]=6.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.99–23.10), and one patient (0.4%) died of disease. Fifty-one (14.0%) women became pregnant after recurrence, and progestin re-treatment demonstrated a possibility of pregnancy (OR=2.48; 95% CI=0.94–6.58).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis suggests that repeat progestin therapy is an effective option for women with recurrent EIN, AH and EC, who wish to retain their fertility.