Objective:Exploring the " bottle neck" factors in the scientific research management of recipient hospitals, making good use of counterpart support resources to help identifying appropriate, tailored strategies of scientific research management that might improve the research capacity of recipient hospitals.Methods:Data were collected according to questionnaire survey and on-site interview, ABC classification method were used to perform statistical analysis, and " bottleneck" factors that constraint the scientific research work of the recipient hospital were summarized.Results:" Insufficient scientific research skills and lacking of talents" and " lacking of scientific research environment and recognition" are the two most prominent factors that negatively affect the scientific research capacity building of the recipient hospitals, followed closely by " the out-dated scientific research policies and lacking support from the hospital leadership" , insufficient of research platform or resources including research funding, as well as other factors. Based on such findings, this article took the First People's Hospital of Kashgar (Guangdong counterpart support) as an example, and tried to discuss some corresponding measures on how to make good use of counterpart support resources.Conclusions:The ABC classification method were used to identify the main " bottleneck" factors, and a series of effective measures that help to making good use of counterpart support resources were explored. As a result, the efficiency of the scientific research management of the recipient hospitals, which in terms of management methods, management concepts and management models, were improved.

Objective: To investigate the current status of professional identity among the undergraduates majoring in public affairs management and the related influence factors. Methods: A stratified cluster sampling method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among the 115 undergraduates majoring in public affairs management in a medical university in Harbin, China, and the contents of the questionnaires included general status and professional identity. The t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors of professional identity. In-depth interviews were conducted for some students to explore the profound influencing factors for professional identity among the students majoring in public affairs management. Results: The overall level of professional identity was low among the undergraduates majoring in public affairs management in the medical university in Harbin, and the score of professional identity was 3.25±0.56. The scores of cognitive dimension, emotional dimension, behavioral dimension, and applicable dimension were 3.41±0.69, 3.21±0.78, 3.24±0.71, and 3.13±0.72, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that grade, academic performance, major selection, and children number in family had significant influence on their professional identity. The students who were at grade four, who had high academic record (b=-0.276, P<0.01), who chose this major independently (b=-0.277, P<0.01), and who were the only child (b=-0.233, P<0.05) had a high score of professional identity. As for the undergraduates at different grades, the undergraduates at grades two and three had a significantly lower score of professional identity than those at grade four (b=-0.296 and -0.369, P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the undergraduates at grades one and four (b=-0.008, P>0.05). Furthermore, the students with a high score of professional identity had higher possibility to pursue the job related to this major than those with a low score (3.39±0.53 vs. 2.92±0.49, t=4.414, P<0.01). Conclusion Universities should strengthen the publicity of the major of public affairs management, optimize the curriculum, and add job experience, so as to enhance professional identity among students with this major and provide talent for the field of public health management.