Background: Liver regeneration is dependent on the proliferation of hepatocytes. Hepatic progenitorcells are intra-hepatic precursor cells capable of differentiating into hepatocytes or biliary cells.Although liver progenitor cell proliferation during the regenerative process has been observed in animalmodels of severe liver injury, it has never been observed in vivo in humans because it is unethicalto take multiple biopsy specimens for the purpose of studying the proliferation of liver progenitorcells and the roles they play in liver regeneration. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligationfor staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a staged procedure for inducing remnant liver hypertrophy sothat major hepatectomy can be performed safely. This staged procedure allows for liver biopsyspecimens to be taken before and after the liver begins to regenerate. Case presentation: The liverprogenitor cell proliferation is observed in a patient undergoing ALPPS for a metastatic hepatictumour. Liver biopsy is acquired before and after ALPPS for the calculation of average number ofliver progenitor cell under high magnification examination by stain of immunomarkers. This is thefirst in vivo evidence of growing liver progenitor cells demonstrated in a regenerating human liver.

Background: Shared decision making using patient decision aids (PtDAs) was established over a decade ago, but few studies have evaluated its efficacy in Asian countries. We therefore evaluated the application of PtDAs in a decision conflict between two muscle relaxant reversal agents, neostigmine and sugammadex, and sequentially analyzed the regional differences and operating room turnover rates. Methods: This multicenter, outcome-assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial included 3,132 surgical patients from two medical centers admitted between March 2020 and August 2020. The patients were randomly divided into the classical and PtDA groups for pre-anesthesia consultations. Their clinicodemographic characteristics were analyzed to identify variables influencing the choice of reversal agent. On the day of the pre-anesthesia consultation, the patients completed the four SURE scale (sure of myself, understand information, risk-benefit ratio, encouragement) screening items. The operating turnover rates were also evaluated using anesthesia records. Results: Compared with the classical group, the PtDA group felt more confident about receiving sufficient medical information (P < 0.001), felt better informed about the advantages and disadvantages of the medications (P < 0.001), exhibited a superior understanding of the benefits and risks of their options (P < 0.001), and felt surer about their choice (P < 0.001). Moreover, the PtDA group had a significantly greater tendency to choose sugammadex over neostigmine (P < 0.001). Conclusions PtDA interventions in pre-anesthesia consultations provided surgical patients with clear knowledge and better support. PtDAs should be made available in other medical fields to enhance shared clinical decision-making.