Objective To explore the application of polysomnography combined with arterial spin labeling(ASL)perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of insomnia.Methods Forty-two insomnia patients admitted to Department of Neurology were included as insomnia group,while 41 healthy subjects during the same period were included as control group.The two groups were assessed using sleep habits questionnaire,hospital anxiety and depression scale,polysomnography,and ASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.Results Compared with control group,insomnia group took significantly more time to fall asleep(P<0.05),and has shorter sleep duration(P<0.05).The differences in the levels of anxiety and depression between two groups were trivial.The total sleep time,rapid eye movement sleep duration,and non-rapid eye movement sleep stage S2-S4were shorter,while the sleep latency and non-rapid eye movement sleep stage S1were longer in insomnia group as compared with control group(all P<0.05).In insomnia group,perfusion was increased in bilateral prefrontal lobes,right temporal lobe,left parietal lobe,right thalamus,and pons(P<0.05),but decreased in bilateral insula and bilateral basal ganglia(P<0.05).Conclusion The combination of polysomnography and ASL perfusion magnetic resonance imaging enables precise quantification of sleep condition.

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of multi-target transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and single-target tDCS on the performance of working memory-postural control dual-task in healthy adults, and to compare the regulatory effect of the two stimulation protocols. MethodsFrom November, 2020 to February, 2021, 19 healthy adults in Shanghai University of Sport were recruited and randomly accepted multi-target tDCS, single-target tDCS and sham stimulation with at least one week interval between any two stimulation protocols. The target areas of multi-target tDCS included left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC) and bilateral primary motor cortex (M1), and single-tDCS only applied to L-DLPFC. Before and after stimulation, participants completed walking and standing balance tests under single task and dual-task conditions with the second task being a N-back task. The dual-task postural control performance, dual-task cost (DTC) and working memory performance were observed before and after stimulation. ResultsSignificant differences were observed among three stimulation protocols in the changes of stride variability (F = 3.792, P = 0.029), DTC of stride variability (F = 3.412, P = 0.040) and velocity of center of pressure (Vcop) (F = 3.815, P = 0.029). The stride variability (P = 0.047) and Vcop (P = 0.015) were significantly lower and the decrease in DTC of stride variability tended to be significant (P = 0.073) following multi-target tDCS, as compared to sham stimulation. Single-target tDCS significantly decreased the changes of stride variability (P = 0.011), DTC of stride variability (P = 0.014) and Vcop (P = 0.025), as compared to sham stimulation. Compared with single target tDCS, multi-target tDCS reduced the changes of the dual-task cost of the area of center of pressure (P = 0.035). Moreover, no significant difference was observed among the three stimulation protocols in the changes of each measure in the working memory test (P > 0.05). ConclusionBoth multi-target tDCS and single-target tDCS can improve the performance of working memory-postural control dual-task in healthy adults, and compared with single-target tDCS, multi-target tDCS has some advantages in regulating postural control.