Objective To analyse the suffer′excrescent circumstance in chromosome who are primary amenorrhea or secondary amenorrhea and inquiry its clinical meaning .Methods Take out patients′peypheyal vein blood to cultuve ,the chromosome was pre‐pared ,G band was analysed .Results primary amenorrhea or secondary amenorrhea suffer totally 225 ,there were 63 with chromo‐som abnormal karyotyptes which occupies 28% ;Among 148 the patiens of primary amenorrhea ,chromosom abnormal karyotyptes were 55 examples which occupies 37 .16% ,secondary amenorrhea is 77 examples ,chromosom abnormal karyotyptes were 8 exam‐ples which occupies 10 .39% .Conclusion Chromosome abnormals are the main cause of primary amenorrhea and secondary amen‐orrhea .in patients with chromosom analyse ,to kncw the cause of amenorrhea ,early symptomatic treatment is important .

Objective To compare volumetric size, conformity index (CI), degree of inclusion (DI) of internal gross target volumes (IGTV) delineated on 4D-CT-MIP and PET-CT images for primary thoracic esophageal cancer. Methods Fifteen patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially underwent enhanced 3D-CT, 4D-CT and PET-CT simulation scans. IGTVMIP was obtained by contouring on 4D-CT maximum intensity projection ( MIP). The PET contours were determined with nine different threshold methods (SUV≥2?0, 2?5, 3?0, 3?5), the percentages of the SUVmax(≥20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%) and manual contours. The differences in size, conformity index (CI), degree of inclusion ( DI) of different volumes were compared. Results The volume ratios ( VRs) of IGTVPET2. 5 to IGTVMIP , IGTVPET20% to IGTVMIP, IGTVPETMAN to IGTVMIP were 0?86, 0?88, 1?06, respectively, which approached closest to 1. The CIs of IGTVPET2?0,IGTVPET2.5,IGTVPET20%,IGTVPETMAN and IGTVMIP which were 0?55, 0?56, 0?56, 0?54,0?55, respectively, were significantly larger than other CIs of IGTVPET and IGTVMIP (Z= -3?408-2?215,P <0?05). There were no statistical significance in the DIs of IGTVMIP and IGTVPET2.5,IGTVMIP and IGTVPET20%, IGTVMIP and IGTVPETMAN(0?77,0?82,0?71,0?67, 0?68,0?82,P>0?05). Conclusions The targets delineated based on SUV threshold setting of≥2?5, 20% of the SUVmax and manual contours on PET images correspond better with the target delineated on maximum intensity projection of 4D-CT images than other SUV thresholding methods.