1.Effect of self-designed secondary prevention list in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention
Modern Clinical Nursing 2017;16(11):30-34
Objective To explore the effect of self-designed two-level prevention list in the care to patients with coronary heart disease(CHD)treated with percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods Seventy-four CHD patients having undergone PCI during October 2013 and October 2015 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group equally.In the control group,the routine outpatient visit every 3 months was done without any intervention.Apart from the routine outpatient visit,in the observation group,a phone call follow-up every half month was done with intervention on the medication and lifestyle using the self-designed secondary prevention list.The two groups were compared in terms of blood fat,blood pressure,medicine-taking compliance and lifestyle. Results After 6 months follow-up,there were insignificant differences in medication compliance of four drugs between the two groups (P>0.05),but there were significant differences between them in blood fat,blood pressure and lifestyle (P<0.05),where the total cholesterol,low density lipoprotein and systolic blood pressure were significantly lower than those of the control group,while the smoking-quitting rate and the physical exercise qualification rate were significantly higher (all P<0.05). Conclusion The self-designed two-level prevention list is effective in improving the lifestyle of the CHD patients after PCI,good for the control of blood fat and pressure.
2.Application of the solution-focused approach in real cross-sectional assessment of young nurses
Yangqiu ZHAO ; Junfang XU ; Zhongmei LYU ; Hongmei CHU
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing 2017;23(11):1565-1568
Objective To explore the effect of the solution-focused approach when applied in real cross-sectional assessment of young nurses. Methods Totally 136 young nurses who worked in Hai'an Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University for less than 3 years were selected by stratified sampling and random number table, and equally divided into an observation group and a control group between January and December 2015. Nurses in the control group were assessed through the real cross-sectional approach, while nurses in the observation group were not only assessed through the real cross-sectional approach, but also intervened through the solution-focused approach. Then the two groups were compared according to the results of the real cross-sectional assessment and Selfrating Anxiety Scale (SAS) before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention, there was no statistical significance in the two groups' results of the real cross-sectional assessment and SAS (P>0.05); Psychologically intervened with the solution-focused approach, the observation group's score for the real cross-sectional assessment (82.044±2.195) was higher than that of the control group (75.573±4.536), and the observation group's SAS score (39.058±4.270) was lower than that of the control group (51.382±5.411) (t=10.588,14.742;P<0.05).Conclusions The solution-focused approach, when applied in real cross-sectional assessment of young nurses, helps to reduce nurses' mental pressure and anxiety and build up their confidence substantially, thus improving their real performance capability.
3.Expression of the Cholinesterase-Related Cell Division Controller Gene in Peripheral Blood Cell from Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Jidong LIAO ; Yangqiu LI ; Shaohua CHENG ; Xiujun MA ; Lijian YANG ; Xin ZHAO
Journal of Experimental Hematology 2000;8(3):192-195
To investigate the expression of the cholinesterase-related cell division controller (CHED) gene in the patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), CHED gene expression was assayed by RT-PCR and its relative expression rate (RER) was determined by the semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 21 patients with MDS, 12 normal individuals served as controls. Results showed that RER of CHED in the patients (2.69 +/- 0.76) was significantly higher than that in controls (1.12 +/- 0.51, P < 0.01), the RER out of 85.7% of the patients was higher than the mean value of the controls, in which three patients developed into acute leukemia; the RER out of 61.9% of the patients was higher than the upper limit of the mean value of the controls; three patients whose RER was lower than the mean value of the controls did not developed into leukemia. These findings suggested that the expression of CHED gene in patients with MDS was significantly higher than in controls.