1. Application of axillary vein puncture and catheterization based on Nickalls' landmarks in treating patients with multiple injuries
Song GONG ; Yangfan ZHUANG ; Jige CHEN ; Xiangjun BAI ; Zhanfei LI ; Wei GAO
Chinese Journal of Trauma 2019;35(10):918-923
Objective:
To investigate the application of the axillary central venous catheterization (CVC) based on Nickalls' landmarks in treating adult multiple injury patients.
Methods:
A retrospective case control study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 83 adult multiple injury patients treated in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology from August 2017 to August 2018. There were 48 males and 35 females, aged 21-84 years [(56.5±14.3)years]. The body mass index ranged from 19.8 to 43.1 kg/m2 [(27.6±6.5)kg/m2]. There were 26 patients with mainly craniocerebral injury, 15 with mainly thoracic injury, 28 with mainly abdominal injury, eight with mainly spinal injury and six with mainly pelvic fracture. The injury severity score (ISS) ranged from 24 to 66 points [(41.8±18.1)points]. All the patients received the axillary CVC based on Nickalls' landmarks. The left axillary vein was used as the puncture vein in 16 patients (left group), and the right axillary vein was used as the puncture vein in 67 patients (right group). A total of 36 patients were combined with the clavicle and/or 1-3 rib fractures at the same side as the puncture site (adjacent fracture group), while 47 patients were not combined with the clavicle and/or 1-3 rib fractures at the same side as the puncture site (non-adjacent fracture group). The success rate of catheterization, pneumothorax, hematoma or artery injury, catheter ectopia, catheter-related infection and catheter-related thrombosis were recorded.
Results:
A total of 80 patients were successfully intubated, with a success rate of 96%. Subgroup analysis showed that the success rate of right group was [97% (65/67)], slightly higher than that of the left group [94%(15/16)] , but the difference was not statistically significant (