1.Expression of potential molecular markers in prostate cancer: correlation with progression in patients after endocrine therapy
Yangbo GUAN ; Yifen ZHANG ; Hang WEN ; Qiang ZHOU ; Hongyan WU ; Yutian DAI
Chinese Journal of Urology 2009;30(12):848-851
Objective To evaluate the expression of molecular markers in prostate cancer and to clarify the significance of these markers as prognostic indicators for androgen deprivation therapy. Methods A series of 116 prostate cancer patients under androgen deprivation therapy as a single treatment was reviewed. Expression levels of 7 proteins, including androgen receptor(AR),E-cadherin, Chromogranin A(CgA) , Ki-67, Survivin, EZH2 and hepsin, were measured by immunohistochemical staining. Results Of the 7 molecules. Ki67,EZH2 and Survivin expression were significantly associated with several conventional prognostic factors. Univariate analysis identified clinical stage, Glea-son scores,pretreatment serum PSA level, Ki-67 and Survivin expression as significant predictors for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression after endocrine therapy. Of these significant factors, Survivin expression, clinical stage and Gleason scores appeared to be independently related to PSA progression after endocrine therapy by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, there were significant differences in PSA progression-free survival according to positive numbers of these three independent risk factors. Conclusion Survivin could be a useful independent prognostic factor in prostate cancer with endocrine therapy, besides clinical stage and Gleason score.
2.Preliminary experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy by extraperitoneal three-hole method
Yunfei TAN ; Yu SONG ; Huyang XIE ; Yangbo GUAN ; Bo CAI ; Limin MA
Journal of Modern Urology 2024;29(3):244-247
【Objective】 To introduce a surgical technique modified by our center, the establishment of a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) channel with extraperitoneal three-port method, and discuss its methods, skills, safety and efficacy. 【Methods】 Clinical data of 21 patients with early and intermediate prostate cancer treated with this surgery during Aug.2022 and Jun.2023 were retrospectively analyzed.Surgical time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, drainage tube retention time, postoperative hospital stay, and follow-up results were observed. 【Results】 All 21 cases of surgery were successfully completed by the same surgeon, without peritoneal rupture or addition of auxiliary holes.The time to establish the extraperitoneal gap and install robotic arm was 20.2 (16.0-28.0) min, the operation time was 107.0(60.0-161.0) min, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was 52.8 (31.0-121.0) mL.All patents resumed eating and drinking the next day after operation.The drainage tube indwelling time was 3.9 (2.0-6.0) d, and the postoperative hospital stay was 4.9 (3.0-7.0) d.No serious complications occurred.The urinary catheter was removed 10 days after operation.One month after operation, 20 patients (95.2%) achieved satisfactory urinary control.The postoperative pathology was prostate adenocarcinoma in all cases, with negative margins, and the prognostic grouping of ISUP was 2 cases in group 1, 6 cases in group 2, 10 cases in group 3, 2 cases in group 4, and 1 case in group 5. 【Conclusion】 RARP by extraperitoneal three-hole method is safe and feasible, with exact establishment of extraperitoneal space, few collisions between instruments, low surgical costs, fast postoperative intestinal recovery, aesthetic incision, and satisfactory recovery of urinary control.
3.A study of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure-control in treating patients with urogenic sepsis after drainage at different times
Wei MENG ; Feng LYU ; Huajun ZHANG ; Bo CHEN ; Shuaijiang LU ; Ningning LI ; Bo CAI ; Limin MA ; Yangbo GUAN
Journal of Modern Urology 2024;29(2):126-129
【Objective】 To investigate the safety and effectiveness of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure-control at different times after drainage for patients with urogenic sepsis complicated with upper urinary tract stones. 【Methods】 Clinical data of 59 patients treated in the Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University during May 2022 and May 2023 were collected.The patients were divided into early lithotripsy (≤1 week) group (n=27) and late lithotripsy (>1 week) group (n=32).Baseline data, imaging data and postoperative data of the two groups were compared. 【Results】 There were no significant differences between the two groups in the stone-free rate, total incidence of complications, incidence of high-grade complications, length of stay after lithotripsy, hospitalization costs after lithotripsy and total hospitalization costs (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 Both early lithotripsy (<1 week) and late lithotripsy (>1 week) are safe and effective in the treatment of urogenic sepsis after drainage.