The pourpose of this study is to investigate the differences in muscle thickness between males and females of Japanese elite athletes. Subjects were 82 males and 65 females who were Japan candidates for the 1986 Asian and the 1988 Olympic Games 8 sports events, e, g., sprinters, middle and long distance runners, throwers, swimmers, gymnasts, volleyball players, basketball players, and oarsmen. Muscle thicknesses were measured by using B-scan ultrasound equipment with a 5 MHz transducer at the follwing sites: forearm anterior, biceps, triceps, subsucapular, abdomen, quadriceps, hamstrings and posterior calf. In results, comparison in muscle thickness between males and females were made at upper extremity (forearm+biceps+triceps), trunk (subsucapular+ abdomen) and lower extremity (quadriceps+hamstrings+calf) . Males showed siginificantly higher values in muscle thickness than females at all sites, except for trunk of distance runners and lower extremity of volleyball players. Relative values of females to males in muscle thickness were 59-84% for upper extremity, 68-89% for trunk, 84-94% for lower extremity. At upper extremity and trunk, Males indicated significantly higher values in muscle thickness per body height (muscle thickness/Ht) execpt for distance runners. At lower extremity, however, there were no siginificant differences in muscle thickness/Ht at lower between males and females except for gymnasts. Relative values of females to males in muscle thickness/Ht were 66-94% for upper extremity, 72-99% for trunk and 89-100% for lower extremity. Males showed significantly higher values in upper/lower extremity ratio of muscle thickness than females, except for sprinters and distance runners. On the other hand, females had significantly higher values in lower/trunk ratio of muscle thickness than males, except for distance runners and gymnasts. These results indicate that the differences in muscle thickness between males and females exist remarkably at upper extremity and trunk commpared to lower extremity. These anatomical differences in the degree of muscle development may be refered to genetic and/or enviromental factors.

The purpose of the present study is to observe the accuracy of the ultrasonic A-mode method for measuring subcutaneous fat thickness. Nine healthy adults (4 males and 5 females) volunteered as experimental subjects. The skin and subcutaneous fat thickness at four different positions, the anterior, posterior, medialis and lateralis of the forearm, upper arm, leg and thigh, were measured by means of an A-mode ultrasonic subcutaneous fat caliper (CANON, CH 300-FT) and also by a B-mode method (ALOKA, SSD-120, ECHOVISION, Circular compound scanner) . Correlation coefficients of subcutaneous fat thickness between both ultrasonic methods were 0.808 for the forearm, 0.780 for the upper arm, 0.833 for the leg and 0.843 for the thigh with a statistical significance of 0.1 % level, respectively.
Differences of the thickness of subcutaneous fat between both methods were from 0.6 to 2.0mm as every absolute mean values. No significant differences were observed for mean subcutaneous fat thickness between both methods at each position. From these results, the A-mode ultrasonic method (CANON, CH 300-FT) is considered to be useful for measuring the thickness of skin and subcutaneous fat in human limbs.

Eleven feamle distance runners were assessed for body composition, limb composition, and skinfold thickness. Body composition was measured by underwater weighing method. The cross-sectional area of subcutaneous fat and muscle in forearm, upper arm, leg, and thigh were obtained by using ultrasonic system. Skinfold thicnesses of seven sites were determined with ultrasonic apparatus. Runners averaged 157.0 cm in body height, 50.2 kg in body weight, 18.9% in relative body fat, and 40.6 kg in lean body mass. When compared untrained normal women, runners had significantly lower relative fat. However, there were no significant differences in lean body mass between runners and untrained. Within runners the more successful performers possessed lower relative body fat. Runners showed lower values of skinfold thickness than that of untrained for all measurement sites. The greatest differences in skinfold thickness between runners and untrained was found in side abdomen. Subcutaneous fat area of runners were significantly smaller than that of untrained. However, runners showed significantly larger muscle area for leg only compared with untrained. These results in body and limb composition of female distance runners may be mainly reffered to the characteristics of aerobic running training.