Objective To establish a method for determining the molecular weight (Mw) and molecular weight distribution of Iron Maltose Syrup. Methods HPGPC was used; PSS HEMA was used as column.Detector was differential refraction detector.Mobile phase was phosphate buffer solution (pH6.8) at 0.5 mL/min, column temperature was 45℃.Results The Mw of 3 batches of Iron Maltose Syrup were 45000-47000 Da with good linearity, precision and reproducibility.Conclusion The method is simple, reliable and accepted by the specification for controlling the molecular weight and weight distribution of Iron Maltose Syrup.

Objective:To establish an HPLC method for the determination of the related substances in vidarabine monophosphate for injection. Methods:The known impurities vidarabine and adenine in vidarabine monophosphate for injection were analyzed by an external standard method on a Kromasil 100-5 C18 column(250 mm × 4. 6 mm,5μm)with the mobile phase consisting of water(contai-ning 10 mmol·L-1 tetrabutyl ammonium hydroxide and 10 mmol·L-1 potassium dihydrogen phosphate)-methanol(80:20)at a flow rate of 1. 0 ml·min-1,the detection wavelength was set at 258nm,the column temperature was at 30℃,and the sample size was 20μl. Meanwhile,the unknown impurities were examined by a self-control method. Results:Good linear relationships of vidarabine and adenine were obtained within the range of 0.0765 ~1.530 7μg·ml-1(r =0.999 9)and 0.078 0 ~1.560 0 μg·ml-1(r =0. 999 9). The corresponding average recovery was 99. 8% with RSD of 0. 2%(n=9)for vidarabine and 97. 0% with RSD of 1. 2%(n=9)for adenine. Conclusion:The method can be used to determine the related substances in vidarabine monophosphate for injec-tion.

Objective To establish a HPLC method for the determination of preservative in iron maltose syrup.Methods A Kromasil 100-5 C18 column was used with acetonitrile-sodium acetate buffer solution(40 ︰60) as the mobile phase at the flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and 254 nm as the detection wavelength.The column temperature was set at 30 ℃.Results The calibration curve was linear within the range of 0.62 ~3.72 μg/mL for methyl parahydroxybenzoate, 0.18~1.07μg/mL for propyl parahydroxybenzoate, and the linear equation was Y=228494X-2512.5,Y=203351X-3471.4, respectively.The average recovery of methyl parahydroxybenzoate, propyl parahydroxybenzoate was 100.9%(RSD=1.5%),99.6%(RSD=0.5%), respectively.Conclusion The established method is simple, rapid and accurate, which could be used in the determination of preservative in iron maltose syrup.

OBJECTIVE:To establish a method for the determination of ethanol,acetonitrile,dichloromethane,ethyl acetate, pyridine in vidarabine monophosphate. METHODS:Headspace GC was performed on the column of Agilent DB-624,programmed temperature,inlet temperature was 200 ℃,the detector was flame ionization detector,detecting temperature was 250 ℃,nitrogen was carrier gas,flow rate was 3 ml/min,split ratio was 1∶1,the top bottles equilibrium temperature was 100 ℃,and equilibrium time was 45 min,injection volume was 1 ml. external standard was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS:The peaks of five re-sidual solvents could be completely separated from the other peaks respectively,The linear rang was 24.7-296.3 μg/ml for ethanol (r=0.999 6)、1.9-23.2 μg/ml for acetonitrile(r=0.999 0),2.8-33.6 μg/ml for dichloromethane(r=0.998 0),24.7-295.9 μg/ml for ethyl acetate(r=0.999 5),1.0-11.9 μg/ml for pyridine(r=0.998 6);RSDs of precision and reproducibility tests were lower than 4.35%;recoveries were 102.4%(RSD=2.0%,n=9)、102.1%(RSD=3.4%,n=9)、105.5%(RSD=4.8%,n=9)、100.3%(RSD=4.8%, n=9)、98.3%(RSD=4.0%,n=9). The minimum quantifation limit was 0.304 4-0.988 0 μg/ml and the minimum detection limit was 0.101 5-0.329 3 μg/ml. CONCLUSIONS:The method is simple,accurate and reproducible,and can be used for the determination of residual solvents in vidarabine monophosphate.

OBJECTIVETo find an inhibitor to reduce the volatilization of formalin.

METHODThe saturated solution of sodium hydrosulphite (SHS) was sprayed on the surface of the anatomy specimens, then the concentration of formaldehyde in the air was tested.

RESULTSThe concentration of formaldehyde in the air of SHS sprayed group [(3.10 +/- 1.22) mg/m3] was significantly lower than that of the control group [(8.36 +/- 4.11) mg/m3, P < 0.01].

CONCLUSIONSHS may be a volatilization inhibitor for formalin, which could reduce the concentration of formaldehyde in the air.

Air Pollution, Indoor ; prevention & control ; Anatomy ; Formaldehyde ; analysis ; chemistry ; Sulfites ; chemistry ; Volatilization