1.Ethical Issues in the Recruitment of Subjects during Phase I Clinical Trial
Xufang GU ; Weiqin ZHONG ; Baohe WANG
Chinese Medical Ethics 2016;29(5):801-803
Subject recruitment is an important part of clinical researches. It should follow the ethical principles of fairness and representativeness. The recruitment process should pay attention to protecting the privacy of sub-jects. Various recruitment materials must be approved by the ethics committee before use. Whether could recruit el-igible subjects during Phase I clinical trials will have a significant impact on the results, which should attract the relevant persons′attention including the ethics committee, researchers, clinical research associate and the sponsor.
2.Analysis of the dilemmas of the simplified ethical review procedure in practice
Benze HU ; Yuhong HUANG ; Xufang GU ; Weihua GUO ; Siyuan HU ; Yaqing YANG
Chinese Medical Ethics 2025;38(1):46-51
In September 2023, the Measures for Scientific and Technological Ethics Review (Trial Implementation) was issued, revising the provisions related to the simplified procedure for ethical review in Chapter 3, Section 3. This revision of these provisions provides systematic guarantees for further optimizing ethical review work, ensuring that ethical review procedure is well-regulated, and improving scientific research efficiency. The “simplified procedure” does not mean reducing the quality and requirements of the review. Instead, based on always following internationally recognized ethical standards and emphasizing not violating national laws and regulations, improving the efficiency of ethical review and subsequent research work, and promoting the development of life sciences and medical research involving humans. In practical work, it introduces numerous new opportunities and challenges for the improvement of ethics review ability, such as new tests on the judgment and decision-making power of ethics committees, how to ensure the reliability and controllability of the conditions related to the simplified review procedure, and how to determine the basic conditions for adopting the simplified review procedure for review. Therefore, to actively respond to the challenges and possible risks brought by the simplified procedure review, efforts should be made to achieve three “unifications”, including the unification of researchers’ moral autonomy and the heteronomy of supervision implemented by relevant departments; the unification of the standard formulation of the simplified procedure review and the review work in practice; and the unification of ethical responsibility and legal responsibility.