Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy or postoperative adjutant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from 2011 to 2016 in Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analysed.A total of 30 cases received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group A),5 of them received concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with bevacizumab target treatment.The other 46 cases (group B) were given post-operative adjutant chemoradiotherapy.Both group A and group B were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).The chemoradiotherapy regime was as follows:the median of target volume dose was 50.4 Gy (45.0-55.8 Gy);the median of chemotherapy sessions was 26 times (24-28 times).Capecitabine tablets (825 mg/m2,twice a day) were also given on the date of chemotherapy.The clinical data and follow-up results of all patients were compared between the two groups.Results The five-year disease free survival rates of group A and group B were 66.7％ and 57.7％,respectively;and the five-year overall survival rates of group A and group B were 81.8％ and 73.0％,respectively,no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.599,0.489).The anus-preserving rates of patients with tumor below peritoneal reflection in group A and group B were 56.52％ and 25.00％,there was statistically significant difference (P=0.045).In the group A,86.6 ％ patients resulted in down-staging,including 3 cases with complete pathologic response.Conclusion Preoperative chemotherapy could down tumor stage and improve rates of anal preservation and local control without increasing possibility of postoperative complications.Preoperative chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab target treatment may be more effective in lowering tumor stage.

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of Iamivudine-interferon sequential therapy and lamivudine monotherapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsA total of 172 patients with HBeAg-positive CHB were randomized to sequential group (n=83) or lamivudine group (n=89).Sequential group were administrated with lamivudine 100 mg/d and 5 million units interferon alpha 2b subcutaneous injection every other day for 24 weeks were added since week 25 of treatment.Lamivudine group were administrated with lamivudine 100 mg/d for 48 weeks.All subjects were followed up for 24 weeks after drug withdrawal.Measurement data with homogeneity of variance were analyzed by using t test and data with heterogeneity of variance were analyzed by using rank sum test.The comparison of rates was done by chi square test or Fisher exact test.ResultsThe baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels of patients in sequential group and lamivudine group were (7.8±1.0) and (7.9±1.1) lg copy/mL,respectively (P＞0.05),and the baseline alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were (210.5 ± 150.1 ) and (211.9 ± 160.9) U/L,respectively (P＞0.05).At the end of treatment,higher ALT levels [(78.4±146.1) vs (36.1±32.4) U/L,P＜0.05)] and HBV DNA levels [(4.5±1.5) vs (3.8±1.3) lg copy/mL,P＜0.05)] levels,lower response rates (65.8％ vs 83.5％,P＜0.05),and similar HBeAg loss rates (31.6％ vs 22.2％,P＞0.05) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (27.6％ vs 16.0％,P＞0.05) were found in sequential group compared with lamivudine group.At the end of follow-up,higher ALT levels [(126.0±143.1) vs (82.7±83.0) U/L,P＜0.05)],similar HBV DNA levels [(5.3±1.5) vs (5.0±1.5) lg copy/mL,P＞0.05)],similar HBeAg loss rates (25.0％ vs 32.3％,P＞0.05) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (25.0 ％ vs 26.2 ％,P＞0.05) were found in sequential group compared with lamivudine group.YMDD motif mutation rate in sequential group was lower than lamivudine group at week 48 of treatment (10.5％ vs 26.9％,P＜0.05).ConclusionsLamivudine-interferon sequential therapy and lamivudine monotherapy are both effective in HBeAg-positive CHB patients,while HBV mutations are reduced in patients with sequential therapy.

Objective: Meta-analysis was conducted on the tetanus antibody protection rate of healthy population born after 1978 in China (data from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan was excluded, the same below). Methods: Search the data on China′s tetanus antibody level which were published in China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang data, VIP, SinoMed database, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. The Chinese search keywords were "Tetanus Antitoxin", "Tetanus Antibody", "Healthy Population" and "Mainland China". English search terms include "tetanus antitoxin", "tetanus vaccine", "tetanus vaccine", "general population" and "mainland of China". The time limit for inclusion in literature research was 2010-2019. Stata software was used to conduct meta-analysis on the protection rate of tetanus antibody. Results: A total of 24 articles were included. There was no obvious publication bias in the included articles. The total number of respondents was 23 530, the antibody protection rate was 49.5%-99.0%. A total of 20 817 people got effective antibody protection, which meant the antibody level reached and exceeded 0.1 IU/ml, and the combined protection rate was 78.6% (95%CI: 75.0%-88.2%). The combined protection rates of antibody in 0-7 years old and 8-15 years old groups were 88.9% (95%CI: 86.9%-91.0%) and 79.3% (95%CI: 72.9%-86.2%) respectively. The combined protection rates of antibodies in 16-20 years old, 21-30 years old and 31-40 years old groups were 58.9% (95%CI: 46.5%-71.2%), 47.7% (95%CI: 16.8%-78.7%) and 63.8% (95%CI:32.6%-95.1%) respectively. The combined protection rate of tetanus antibody for 0-15 years old people was 85.6% (95%CI: 83.1%-88.1%), and the combined protection rate of antibody for 16-40 years old people was 52.9% (95%CI: 39.3%-66.6%). Conclusion With the increase of age, the protection rate of tetanus antibody among the healthy population aged 16-40 years in our country decreases. An individualized vaccination plan should be formulated according to the previous tetanus vaccination history and the tetanus antibody level when necessary.

Critical ultrasonography(CUS) is different from the traditional diagnostic ultrasound,the examiner and interpreter of the image are critical care medicine physicians.The core content of CUS is to evaluate the pathophysiological changes of organs and systems and etiology changes.With the idea of critical care medicine as the soul,it can integrate the above information and clinical information,bedside real-time diagnosis and titration treatment,and evaluate the therapeutic effect so as to improve the outcome.CUS is a traditional technique which is applied as a new application method.The consensus of experts on critical ultrasonography in China released in 2016 put forward consensus suggestions on the concept,implementation and application of CUS.It should be further emphasized that the accurate and objective assessment and implementation of CUS requires the standardization of ultrasound image acquisition and the need to establish a CUS procedure.At the same time,the standardized training for CUS accepted by critical care medicine physicians requires the application of technical specifications,and the establishment of technical specifications is the basis for the quality control and continuous improvement of CUS.Chinese Critical Ultrasound Study Group and Critical Hemodynamic Therapy Collabration Group,based on the rich experience of clinical practice in critical care and research,combined with the essence of CUS,to learn the traditional ultrasonic essence,established the clinical application technical specifications of CUS,including in five parts:basic view and relevant indicators to obtain in CUS;basic norms for viscera organ assessment and special assessment;standardized processes and systematic inspection programs;examples of CUS applications;CUS training and the application of qualification certification.The establishment of applied technology standard is helpful for standardized training and clinical correct implementation.It is helpful for clinical evaluation and correct guidance treatment,and is also helpful for quality control and continuous improvement of CUS application.