Objective To compare the treatment effect of laparoscopic appendectomy(LA)and open appendectomy(OA).To investigate the worth of endoscopic technology in LA.Methods 123 cases of LA and 989 cases of OA performed were studied retrospectively.The clinical data of two groups were summarized,contrasted and analyzed respectively.Results The times of operation,taking food and hospitalization in LA group were obviously shorter than those in OA group.The postoperative pain and the rate of incision infection in LA group were obviously superior to those in OA group.While the cost of hospitalization in LA was obviously higher than that of OA.Conclusion LA have advantages of minimal invasion,quicker recovery.safety and reliability,has significant advantages in treaing appendicitis and should be promoted.

Objective To compare the clinical effect of procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids(PPH)improved,Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoideeomy and Ferguson-Mitchell hemorrhoidecomy in the treatment of the Ⅲ～Ⅳdegree mixed hemorrhoids.Methods 45 cases admitted for surgical treatment of Ⅲ～Ⅳ degree hemorrhoids,were randomly divided into 3 groups,the improved PPH,MMH and FMH were retrospectively reviewed,and it is separately reviewed for the operation time,pain index,length of hospital stay,return to normal activity time,postoperation complication and patients satisfaction etc.Results There was reasonably evidence in favor improved PPH for operating time,hospital stay,pain,anal discharge,and patients satisfaction.Conclusion The improved PPH is a safe and effective procedure for Ⅲ～Ⅳ hemorrhoids and its short-term outcome is more better than Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson-Mitchdl group.