Objective: To investigate whether combined diabetes affects rebleeding after endoscopic treatment in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. Methods: A total of 207 liver cirrhosis cases with esophageal varices bleeding who underwent initial treatment of endoscopic variced ligation or endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2015 to March 2018 were included in the retrospective study. The cases were divided into bleeding group (n=54) and non-bleeding group (n=153) according to the presence or absence of rebleeding within 6 months after treatment. The influencing factors on postoperative bleeding were analyzed by univariate analysis and logistic regession analysis. Results: Univariate analysis showed that gender composition, age, presence or absence of portal vein thrombosis, smoking history, drinking history (P=0.05), hypertension, platelet count, total bilirubin level, albumin level, alanine aminotransferase level, prothrombin time, degree of esophageal varices, and surgical methods were not significantly different (all P≥0.05) between the bleeding group and the non-bleeding group. There were significant differences in diabetes, hemoglobin level, blood glucose level, ascites composition, and liver function grade composition between the two groups (all P<0.05). Combined diabetes (yes/no), hemoglobin levels, blood glucose levels, ascites (none-mild/medium-severe), liver function Child-Pugh classification (Grade A/B-C), and history of drinking (yes/no) were included in multivariate analysis, and results showed that diabetes was an independent risk factor for rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices (P=0.008, OR=2.973, 95%CI: 1.322-6.689). Conclusion After endoscopic treatment of liver cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices, rebleeding is more likely to occur in patients complicated with diabetes.

Objective:To evaluate the risks and benefits of endoscopic ligation and tissue adhesive injection for tortuous gastric varices.Methods:A total of 193 patients with esophagogastric varices, who underwent endoscopic variceal ligation or endoscopic tissue adhesive injection in Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from June 2015 to June 2020, were included in the retrospective analysis. These cases were connected vessels (type Le and gf based on LDRf standard) of tortuous gastric varices (F1 in Hashizume standard). According to the treatment, the patients were divided into three groups: gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, 32 cases), tissue adhesive group (endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices, endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 71 cases) and esophageal ligation group (endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices, 90 cases). The re-bleeding rate, the effectiveness rate, the significant effectiveness rate and complications of the three groups were compared.Results:The rates of re-bleeding in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 12.68% (9/71) and 3.33% (3/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=6.110, P<0.016). The effectiveness rates of the three groups were all 100.00%. The significant effectiveness rates in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 37.50% (12/32), 25.35% (18/71) and 14.44% (13/90), respectively. There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=7.702, P<0.016). No pulmonary infection, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or perforation occurred in the three groups.The incidences of chest pain or abdominal pain in gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group, tissue adhesive group and esophageal ligation group were 18.75% (6/32), 11.27% (8/71) and 2.22% (2/90), respectively.There was significant difference only between gastric fundus and esophageal ligation group and esophageal ligation group ( χ2=10.524, P<0.016). There was no significant difference in the incidence of fever, nausea or vomiting among the three groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Simultaneous endoscopic ligation of gastric fundus and esophageal varices, and endoscopic tissue adhesive injection of gastric varices combined with endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices is of no benefit for patients with tortuous gastric varices, but endoscopic ligation of esophageal varices alone may yield more benefit.

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided selective varices devascularization (EUS-SVD) for the treatment of esophagogastric varices.Methods:A total of 43 cases of liver cirrhosis with esophageal and gastric varices at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from February to December 2021 were included in a retrospective cohort study. The cases were divided into two treatment groups based on endoscopic treatment: EUS-SVD group ( n=22) and conventional endoscopic sclerosant injection group (conventional gastroscopy group, n=21). The doses of sclerosants and tissue glue, effective rate of esophageal varice treatment within 2 months after surgery, rebleeding rate within 3 months after surgery, and adverse reactions were compared. Results:The differences in terms of mean patient age, gender composition, etiology of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh classification of liver function, classification of esophageal varices, composition of endoscopic treatment indications, and mean maximum diameter of gastric varices were not statistically significant between the two groups ( P>0.05), indicating the comparability of baseline data. Perforating veins outside the gastric wall of gastric varices could be detected during the procedure in the EUS-SVD group, and disappearance of gastric varices after injection treatment could be determined, while these two indicators could not be detected in the conventional gastroscopy group. The amounts of sclerosing agents and tissue adhesives used in the EUS-SVD group were 7.54±3.10 mL and 1.30±0.57 mL, respectively, while the corresponding amounts in the conventional gastroscopy group were 7.57±3.50 mL ( t=0.026, P=0.980) and 1.38±0.67 mL ( t=-0.452, P=0.654), respectively. The effective treatment rate for esophageal varice within 2 months after surgery was 63.6% (14/22) in the EUS-SVD group and 52.4% (11/21) in the conventional gastroscopy group, but the difference was not statistically significant ( χ2=0.559, P=0.455). The rebleeding rate within 3 months after surgery was 4.5% (1/22) in the EUS-SVD group, significantly lower than the rate of 33.3% (7/21) in the conventional gastroscopy group ( P=0.021). Neither group experienced events of ectopic embolism or death. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative pain, fever, nausea and vomiting, or rebleeding rate within 72 hours after surgery ( P>0.05). The incidence of gastric fundus ulcers was 9.1% (2/22) in the EUS-SVD group, significantly lower than the rate of 42.9% (9/21) in the conventional gastroscopy group ( χ2=6.435, P=0.011). Conclusion:EUS-SVD treatment for esophagogastric varices is safe and effective. It can clearly display the deep-seated intramural vessels of the gastric wall, measure the diameter of the blood vessels, accurately inject tissue glue, occlude the varicose veins and perforating vessels, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative ulcers and rebleeding.

Objective:To compare the accuracy of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) combined with Indian ink marking in locating injection sites for gastric varices, and to explore the influence of the features of gastric varices under endoscopy on the injection sites.Methods:Consecutive patients with gastric varices scheduled for EUS-guided glue injection therapy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from August 2021 to October 2022 were perspectively included. Firstly, gastric varices were assessed under endoscopy, where the size of the veins were estimated while the injection site was preliminarily judged during the procedure. Then EUS was used to identify perforating feeding veins and mark injection sites with Indian ink. After tissue adhesive was injected into identified varices, the change of varices after injection was observed and the marking was identified under endoscopy again. The clarity of the markinges was confirmed and the consistency between EUS-guided Indian ink mark and that under endoscopy was compared. Patients were divided into anastomosis group and non-anastomosis group based on marking consistency to investigate the effect of gastric varices features on the location of injection sites under endoscopy. Treatment efficacy and postoperative adverse events were counted.Results:Finally, 34 patients were included and all of them underwent successful marking under EUS guidance without complications. A total of 40 marker sites were clearly visible with Indian ink staining under endoscopy. The difference in distribution between the anastomotic group and non-anastomotic group marker points between EUS and endoscopy was statistically significant ( χ2=9.103, P=0.003). Vascular occlusion rate was 100.00% (40/40). There were 13 adverse events after operation, mainly fever, abdominal pain and nausea, and no serious adverse events such as allergy and ectopic embolization occurred. There was significant difference between the blood vessel diameter of the anastomotic group (10.84±4.02 mm) and that of the non-anastomotic group (8.80±1.61 mm, t=1.870, P=0.031). The percentage of raised vessels in the anastomotic group was 88.00% (22/25), higher than that in the non-anastomotic group [53.33% (8/15)], and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=6.009, P=0.024). Conclusion:Accuracy in positioning under endoscopy is influenced by variceal diameter and bulge shape, being less precise in varices with smaller diameters and less pronounced bulges.

Objective : To develop an endoscopic automatic detection system in early gastric cancer (EGC) based on a region-based convolutional neural network ( Mask R-CNN) ． Methods : A total of 3 579 and 892 white light images (WLI) of EGC were obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University for training and testing，respectively．Then，10 WLI videos were obtained prospectively to test dynamic performance of the RCNN system．In addition，400 WLI images were randomly selected for comparison with the Mask R-CNN system and endoscopists．Diagnostic ability was assessed by accuracy，sensitivity，specificity，positive predictive value ( PPV) ， and negative predictive value (NPV) . Results : The accuracy，sensitivity and specificity of the Mask R-CNN system in diagnosing EGC in WLI images were 90. 25% ，91. 06% and 89. 01% ，respectively，and there was no significant statistical difference with the results of pathological diagnosis．Among WLI real-time videos，the diagnostic accuracy was 90. 27%．The speed of test videos was up to 35 frames / s in real time．In the controlled experiment， the sensitivity of Maks R-CNN system was higher than that of the experts (93. 00% vs 80. 20% ，χ2 = 7. 059，P < 0. 001) ，and the specificity was higher than that of the juniors (82. 67% vs 71. 87% ，χ2 = 9. 955，P＜0. 001) ， and the overall accuracy rate was higher than that of the seniors (85. 25% vs 78. 00% ，χ2 = 7. 009，P＜0. 001) . Conclusion The Mask R-CNN system has excellent performance for detection of EGC under WLI，which has great potential for practical clinical application.